• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Part15

Part15

License Free, legal, low-power radio broadcasting

  • About Us
  • Forums
  • Resources
  • Members
  • Contact Us
  • Log In
Rich
@rich
Forum Home   |   Recent Posts
Registered
Reputable Member
Joined: Dec 7, 2005
Follow
Profile Activity
Topics: 81 / Replies: 126
AllTopicsReplies
Topic
Fields Radiated by an Elevated PT15 AM Dipole
7 years ago
Forum
Antennas
Replies: 9
Views: 748
Topic
Antenna vs. Ground Lead
7 years ago
Forum
Antennas
Replies: 1
Views: 916
Reply
RE: FCC Presentation about unlicensed transmitters

Unfortunately, the inexpensive receivers that show a signal strength value in "dBu" on their display screens are reporting only the conducted voltage...

7 years ago
Forum
Regulations / Law
Reply
RE: FCC Presentation about unlicensed transmitters

The use of "73" in that context is a carryover from the days of using Morse code for radio communication, and was/is a shorthand way of saying "Regard...

7 years ago
Forum
Regulations / Law
Reply
RE: FCC Presentation about unlicensed transmitters

RE: ... a rod antenna is not permitted for testing and that they must use a loop antenna... My guess is that it relates to the relative susceptibili...

7 years ago
Forum
Regulations / Law
Reply
RE: FCC Presentation about unlicensed transmitters

The checklist referred to, as well as that whole slide presentation was prepared by the FCC for the benefit of the contractors who are hired by manufa...

7 years ago
Forum
Regulations / Law
Reply
RE: FCC Presentation about unlicensed transmitters

RE: And Carl completes the rebuttal. Not for me -- see post 109878 above.

7 years ago
Forum
Regulations / Law
Reply
RE: FCC Presentation about unlicensed transmitters

RE: ... The bottom line is that if you are using an FCC certified Part 15 transmitter, or you are technically competent and can prove that the non ce...

7 years ago
Forum
Regulations / Law
Reply
RE: FCC Presentation about unlicensed transmitters

RE: ... if you are using an FCC certified Part 15 transmitter... you really have nothing to worry about. ... A gentle reminder: even transmitters ...

7 years ago
Forum
Regulations / Law
Reply
RE: I know I May Be Preaching to the Choir but...

RE: “So, for example, if the d-c input power to an r-f amplifier stage is 100 mW, the r-f input power to it is 2.5 mW, etc." That is a big help, tha...

7 years ago
Forum
Transmitter Talk
Reply
RE: I know I May Be Preaching to the Choir but...

Followup: below are calculations for a ~typical, legal Part 15 AM system...

7 years ago
Forum
Transmitter Talk
Reply
RE: I know I May Be Preaching to the Choir but...

There appears be some general confusion concerning the meaning of the term "input power" as it applies to an r-f amplifier. It is not the r-f input p...

7 years ago
Forum
Transmitter Talk
Reply
RE: Ground-mounted vs. Elevated MW Monopole Antennas: Which Configuration Is Better?

True, for posters other than radio8z and yours truly. In my case, physical measurements have been posted several times in this thread (see the graphi...

7 years ago
Forum
Antennas
Reply
RE: Ground-mounted vs. Elevated MW Monopole Antennas: Which Configuration Is Better?

Suggest that posts based on provable data such as shown in antenna engineering textbooks and other peer-reviewed publications, and/or by accurate phys...

7 years ago
Forum
Antennas
Reply
RE: Ground-mounted vs. Elevated MW Monopole Antennas: Which Configuration Is Better?

RE: ... I came across this article which illustrates what I was attempting to say far more eloquently: etc ... My observation: attempting to shift t...

7 years ago
Forum
Antennas
Page 6 / 14 Prev Next

Primary Sidebar

Online Members

 No online members at the moment

Recent Posts

  • RichPowers

    Ultra long range Part 15 broadcasting (to space)

    While car makers appear to be opting for the licenced s...

    By RichPowers , 17 hours ago

  • Mark

    Here's a look at why we do processing and what each function does.

    Shows for FM but applies to AM also.

    By Mark , 4 days ago

  • Mark

    RE: Early 80s Realty Radio' AM transmitters

    I don't think the audio quality would be that good on t...

    By Mark , 2 weeks ago

  • RichPowers

    RE: Early 80s Realty Radio' AM transmitters

    I was very tempted to buy them both, they were dirt che...

    By RichPowers , 2 weeks ago

  • RichPowers

    RE: Part 15 Too Restrictive for Automakers

    @mark I had to pause when you mentioned "15 minute citi...

    By RichPowers , 2 weeks ago

Recent Topics

  • Mark

    Here's a look at why we do processing and what each function does.

    By Mark 4 days ago

  • RichPowers

    Part 15 Too Restrictive for Automakers

    By RichPowers 2 weeks ago

  • RichPowers

    From Virtue to Vice - Music Morality

    By RichPowers 3 weeks ago

  • RichPowers

    affordable DAC Impressive Versatility “audiophile quality” Promising Big performance at small price

    By RichPowers 3 weeks ago

  • RichPowers

    New Canadian Resident?

    By RichPowers 3 weeks ago

Topic Tags

  • Carl Blare3
  • KDX RADIO3
  • WINDOZE3
  • Transmitter2
  • Radio Phvern2
  • station upgrade2
  • archive.org2
  • playlist2
  • Zara Radio2
  • #SW2101
View all tags (75)

Copyright © 2026 · Part15.org · Log in