• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Part15

Part15

License Free, legal, low-power radio broadcasting

  • About Us
  • Forums
  • Resources
  • Members
  • Contact Us
  • Log In
Forums
Main Category
Regulations / Law
FCC Presentation ab...
 
Notifications
Clear all

FCC Presentation about unlicensed transmitters

 
Page 2 / 3 Prev Next
Regulations / Law
Last Post by Carl Blare 7 years ago
45 Posts
9 Users
0 Reactions
5,390 Views
RSS
 Carl Blare
(@carl-blare)
Posts: 2621
Famed Member Registered
 

I'm Not An Attorney But

Only take legal broadcast advice from an attorney qualified to practice in FCC Law.


 
Posted : 27/02/2019 4:05 am
 Carl Blare
(@carl-blare)
Posts: 2621
Famed Member Registered
 

From the Top

I got to thinking about the 3-page "Presentation" shown at the outset showing Field Inspection Tips, so I've returned to see them again.

In the 1st panel it says: "Use the General Checklist with the following frequent compliance issues..."

Do we have the "General Checklist"?

Next, looking over the various field tips I wonder if their un-detailed style might open an inspector to misinterpret what they say.

The Presentation falls short of slip-shod but is certainly slap-dash.


 
Posted : 27/02/2019 6:37 am
 Rich
(@rich)
Posts: 207
Reputable Member Registered
 

The checklist referred to, as well as that whole slide presentation was prepared by the FCC for the benefit of the contractors who are hired by manufacturers to perform FCC compliance tests and assemble the results into a format acceptable to the FCC -- the goal being that of getting FCC authorization/certification for the sale of a product for which FCC acceptance is desired or required.


 
Posted : 27/02/2019 7:01 am
 Carl Blare
(@carl-blare)
Posts: 2621
Famed Member Registered
 

What VERIFIED?

In Chart # 3 what is meant by the single word VERIFIED (?)


 
Posted : 01/03/2019 9:33 am
RichPowers
 RichPowers
(@richpowers)
Posts: 3358
Famed Member Registered
 

I know this is an ignorant question, but what do they mean a rod antenna is not permitted for testing and that they must use a loop antenna?


 
Posted : 01/03/2019 11:07 am
 Rich
(@rich)
Posts: 207
Reputable Member Registered
 

RE:  ... a rod antenna is not permitted for testing and that they must use a loop antenna...

My guess is that it relates to the relative susceptibility for the performance of these two antenna configurations to be affected by their construction and/or adjustment, and their nearby physical environment.


 
Posted : 01/03/2019 11:43 pm
 timinbovey
(@timinbovey)
Posts: 828
Noble Member Registered
 

The FCC inspector must be using a field strength meter that utilizes a proper antenna. Using a rod antenna to measure field strength is highly inaccurate.

However, in my real life experience when measuring FM field intensities a dipole adjusted to proper length for the frequency is desired, and is in fact provided with most FM FIM devices.

For AM, all professional field intensity meters have a loop antenna.  In devices such as the Potomac FIM-41 or the Nems Clarke 120E for example, there is a calibrated loop antenna built into the flip up lid. To take readings you rotate the meter about it's axis until you find the strongest signal.  I do this regularly at work running checks on our directional night time antenna pattern.

When using my spectrum analyzer to do the NRSC performance measurements for our AM station I set up a large loop antenna on a tripod that feeds the analyzer.

Naturally the loop antenna helps insure that the only signal you're picking up is the desired one.

This is necessary to get accurate field intensity readings.

TIB


 
Posted : 02/03/2019 9:57 pm
 timinbovey
(@timinbovey)
Posts: 828
Noble Member Registered
 

For those interested in reading all 164 frames of this document I have conveniently uploaded it as a pdf here:

http://www.ironrangecountry.com/unlicenseddevicesfcc.pdf

It might offer some context.

TIB

 


 
Posted : 02/03/2019 10:07 pm
RichPowers
 RichPowers
(@richpowers)
Posts: 3358
Famed Member Registered
 

Hmm.. third try:

Out of curiosity, for personal AM field strength readings has anyone ever utilized the SMR radio receiver that ISS offers? http://www.theradiosource.com/products/smr.htm They sell them for $144. Supposedly due to it's S-meter which registers in 15-99 increments it's able to provide rather accurate readings in comparison to a Potomac unit by using a supplied conversion chart..

This summer I'm thinking about buying one - not specifically for that purpose, because it would be so seldom using it and not really worth $150 to me, but more so just as a multiband receiver for everyday use, with the added luxury of calculating readings should you want to.

"..The SMR Receiver is the first device of its kind capable of measuring and displaying AM signal levels with a useful level of precision... This handheld, battery-operated receiver can be utilized in the field to estimate signal intensities of broadcast radio stations. Though not a calibrated measurement device, it displays relative signal intensity in dbu, which can be used for rough translation to millivolts per meter (mV/m) in a given frequency range using an included correlation chart.."


 
Posted : 02/03/2019 11:06 pm
 Carl Blare
(@carl-blare)
Posts: 2621
Famed Member Registered
 

The Important Thing

The important thing being purchased for $144 is the Correlation Chart.

Similar radios with the same signal intensity readings are available for far less.


 
Posted : 03/03/2019 12:29 am
 AMRadiolegend
(@amradiolegend)
Posts: 335
Reputable Member Registered
Topic starter
 

Verified: Mean from an accredited test lab have verified conformance of applicable standards. In the case of digital devices (Unintentional Radiators)  the devices are classified as Class A and Class B with one being an industrial environment and one being a residential environment respectively. Class B devices require certification.


 
Posted : 03/03/2019 10:37 pm
 AMRadiolegend
(@amradiolegend)
Posts: 335
Reputable Member Registered
Topic starter
 

Additionally, the loop antenna responds to the magnetic field as opposed to the electric field.


 
Posted : 03/03/2019 10:40 pm
 AMRadiolegend
(@amradiolegend)
Posts: 335
Reputable Member Registered
Topic starter
 

TNX Tim, I could not get the pdf to load directly as the file size was too large. As a result I had to excerpt my submission.

 

73, me


 
Posted : 03/03/2019 10:44 pm
RichPowers
 RichPowers
(@richpowers)
Posts: 3358
Famed Member Registered
 

What is "73" mean?... I just noticed the same thing in an email response from https://www.arnewsline.org/ - I had asked if they were Part 15 friendly for rebroadcast; He answered:

 

Yes, we would be happy to have ARN on your unlicensed Part 15 hobby station!

73.

Don Wilbanks
AE5DW


 
Posted : 03/03/2019 11:05 pm
 Carl Blare
(@carl-blare)
Posts: 2621
Famed Member Registered
 

I'll Take This One

End80 axes: "What is “73” mean?"

It is from HAM (Amateur) shorthand language and I think it means, "Have a good day and I hope your wife is pretty".


 
Posted : 03/03/2019 11:37 pm
Page 2 / 3 Prev Next
Forum Jump:
  Previous Topic
Next Topic  
Share:
Forum Information
Recent Posts
Unread Posts
Tags
  • 13 Forums
  • 7,740 Topics
  • 63.5 K Posts
  • 53 Online
  • 2,249 Members
Our newest member: electronic
Latest Post: 7 Beatles Misheard Lyrics
Forum Icons: Forum contains no unread posts Forum contains unread posts
Topic Icons: Not Replied Replied Active Hot Sticky Unapproved Solved Private Closed

Primary Sidebar

Online Members

 No online members at the moment

Recent Posts

  • Mark

    RE: 7 Beatles Misheard Lyrics

    Many songs have I heard something other than the actual...

    By Mark , 1 day ago

  • Mark

    RE: 7 Beatles Misheard Lyrics

    Have you heard this?

    By Mark , 1 day ago

  • RichPowers

    Unique AM Transmitter

    Here one I've not seen before. they're $69.50 on eBay, ...

    By RichPowers , 1 day ago

  • RichPowers

    7 Beatles Misheard Lyrics

    As far as I'm concerned this article is ridiculous, I d...

    By RichPowers , 2 days ago

  • Mark

    RE: Newly Discovered Robert Johnson in Stunning Clarity

    @richpowers Sounds good.

    By Mark , 2 days ago

Recent Topics

  • RichPowers

    Unique AM Transmitter

    By RichPowers 1 day ago

  • RichPowers

    7 Beatles Misheard Lyrics

    By RichPowers 2 days ago

  • RichPowers

    Public Domain Feature Films about Radio

    By RichPowers 3 days ago

  • RichPowers

    Speed Limit 17.3mph

    By RichPowers 5 days ago

  • ArtisanRadio

    Artisan Radio Pivots Again

    By ArtisanRadio 5 days ago

Topic Tags

  • Carl Blare3
  • KDX RADIO3
  • WINDOZE3
  • Transmitter2
  • Radio Phvern2
  • station upgrade2
  • archive.org2
  • playlist2
  • Zara Radio2
  • Carrier Current1
View all tags (74)

Copyright © 2026 · Part15.org · Log in

‹›×

    ‹›×