• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Part15

Part15

License Free, legal, low-power radio broadcasting

  • About Us
  • Forums
  • Resources
  • Members
  • Contact Us
  • Log In
pete2169
@pete2169
Forum Home   |   Recent Posts
Registered
Eminent Member
Joined: Nov 15, 2023
Last seen: Nov 19, 2023
Follow
Profile Activity
Topics: 1 / Replies: 27
AllTopicsReplies
Reply
RE: Part 15 fm transmission range

Is there anyway to delete this thread? How do I remove and end this membership? I appreciate all the information I got here, it was helpful but I don'...

3 years ago
Forum
Transmitter Talk
Reply
RE: Part 15 fm transmission range

of course now that the FCC is controlled by a Democrat majority of officers. They're probably not going to be as nice as they used to be. They used to...

3 years ago
Forum
Transmitter Talk
Reply
RE: Part 15 fm transmission range

So the Retekess TR598 is approved and certified by the FCC. It may have a little better performance and a slightly bigger coverage area than a transm...

3 years ago
Forum
Transmitter Talk
Reply
RE: Part 15 fm transmission range

The Retekess TR508 FM transmitter has a special stock Antenna with a unique special antenna connector. (Reverse treads I believe). So a coax cable or ...

3 years ago
Forum
Transmitter Talk
Reply
RE: Part 15 fm transmission range

Besides, a 100 Milliwatt FM transmitter with a Reduced sized antenna and with a special FCC approved unique connector. Qualifies under part 15 Subpar...

3 years ago
Forum
Transmitter Talk
Reply
RE: Part 15 fm transmission range

The Retekess TR508 claims to be Part 15 compliant. It has a label affixed to the transmitter with a part 15 certification number. The number is listed...

3 years ago
Forum
Transmitter Talk
Reply
RE: Part 15 fm transmission range

I just ordered a Retekess TR508 FM transmitter From Ebay. I wrote the company in advance and they assured me that the transmitter is part 15 compliant...

3 years ago
Forum
Transmitter Talk
Reply
RE: The Part 15 FM Certification Process

This is a little off subject, short story.. I know a guy that has an illegal 15 watt Chinese fm transmitter. He asked me if it would over power and ...

3 years ago
Forum
Regulations / Law
Reply
RE: Part 15 fm transmission range

I also made a copy of the eBay listing of the company I bought my range star transmitter from. It states right in their listing that the transmitter i...

3 years ago
Forum
Transmitter Talk
Reply
RE: Part 15 fm transmission range

I'll probably get a transmitter with a certified label at some point. Whether it's the decade Ms 100, or maybe I can find another czh 05b model that a...

3 years ago
Forum
Transmitter Talk
Reply
RE: Part 15 fm transmission range

Thanks Mark, I will do that. I checked my certification # with the Fcc website and it is listed in the part 5 data base I will make a copy of the web ...

3 years ago
Forum
Transmitter Talk
Reply
RE: Part 15 fm transmission range

My Range Star FM transmitter basically covers under a circular mile to high sensitivity receivers. And under a circular half mile to low sensitivity ...

3 years ago
Forum
Transmitter Talk
Reply
RE: Part 15 fm transmission range

Actually I think I'll just stick with my Range Star fm transmitter for now. Like you said the penalties are on the manufacturer. Because it's supposed...

3 years ago
Forum
Transmitter Talk
Reply
RE: Part 15 fm transmission range

The AM transmitter I have is a talking house it works pretty good I'm getting about a 2 mile range. I've heard about the procaster and the range mast...

3 years ago
Forum
Transmitter Talk
Reply
RE: Part 15 fm transmission range

Wow I just checked out the Decade ms 100s. $580 Dollars for the stereo transmitter. And that's if you can find one. I did see a used one on craigslist...

3 years ago
Forum
Transmitter Talk
Page 1 / 2 Next

Primary Sidebar

Online Members

 No online members at the moment

Recent Posts

  • Mark

    Here's a look at why we do processing and what each function does.

    Shows for FM but applies to AM also.

    By Mark , 3 days ago

  • Mark

    RE: Early 80s Realty Radio' AM transmitters

    I don't think the audio quality would be that good on t...

    By Mark , 2 weeks ago

  • RichPowers

    RE: Early 80s Realty Radio' AM transmitters

    I was very tempted to buy them both, they were dirt che...

    By RichPowers , 2 weeks ago

  • RichPowers

    RE: Part 15 Too Restrictive for Automakers

    @mark I had to pause when you mentioned "15 minute citi...

    By RichPowers , 2 weeks ago

  • Mark

    RE: Part 15 Too Restrictive for Automakers

    Your last part.... "It all very interesting but all I...

    By Mark , 2 weeks ago

Recent Topics

  • Mark

    Here's a look at why we do processing and what each function does.

    By Mark 3 days ago

  • RichPowers

    Part 15 Too Restrictive for Automakers

    By RichPowers 2 weeks ago

  • RichPowers

    From Virtue to Vice - Music Morality

    By RichPowers 3 weeks ago

  • RichPowers

    affordable DAC Impressive Versatility “audiophile quality” Promising Big performance at small price

    By RichPowers 3 weeks ago

  • RichPowers

    New Canadian Resident?

    By RichPowers 3 weeks ago

Topic Tags

  • Carl Blare3
  • KDX RADIO3
  • WINDOZE3
  • Transmitter2
  • Radio Phvern2
  • station upgrade2
  • archive.org2
  • playlist2
  • Zara Radio2
  • #SW2101
View all tags (75)

Copyright © 2026 · Part15.org · Log in