• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Part15

Part15

License Free, legal, low-power radio broadcasting

  • About Us
  • Forums
  • Resources
  • Members
  • Contact Us
  • Log In
Forums
Main Category
Transmitter Talk
Part 15 fm transmis...
 
Notifications
Clear all

Sponsored Part 15 fm transmission range

 
Page 4 / 4 Prev
Transmitter Talk
Last Post by Zi 3 years ago
60 Posts
5 Users
5 Reactions
19.1 K Views
RSS
 pete2169
(@pete2169)
Posts: 28
Eminent Member Registered
Topic starter
 

I just ordered a Retekess TR508 FM transmitter From Ebay. I wrote the company in advance and they assured me that the transmitter is part 15 compliant on the low power 100 Milliwatt setting. And it comes with a part 15 certification number labelled on the transmitter.


 
Posted : 19/11/2023 2:05 am
Roy
 Roy
(@wefr)
Posts: 358
Honorable Member Registered
 

@pete2169 That is not Part 15 compliant. Any device CERTIFIED for Part15 can't have a way to change the output power. And it's very doubtful 100 milliwats is even legal under Part 15 for the FM broadcast band.


 
Posted : 19/11/2023 6:21 am
 pete2169
(@pete2169)
Posts: 28
Eminent Member Registered
Topic starter
 

The Retekess TR508 claims to be Part 15 compliant. It has a label affixed to the transmitter with a part 15 certification number. The number is listed in the Fcc database as a part 15 approved device. It May be a little more powerful that 250 microvolts @ 3 meters. But it has been approved. If there was fraud involved by the manufacturer the penalty is on them. With the part 15 label on the transmitter I'm legally protected. If the Fcc aver comes by, (which I doubt they ever will) the most they will do is just tell me to shut it off. Besides an FM transmitter that only puts out 250 microvolts at 3 meters has such a small coverage area it isn't worth doing. 

 


 
Posted : 19/11/2023 8:37 am
 pete2169
(@pete2169)
Posts: 28
Eminent Member Registered
Topic starter
 

Besides, a 100 Milliwatt FM transmitter with a Reduced sized antenna and  with a special FCC approved unique connector. Qualifies under part 15 Subpart, I believe it's Subpart 205 or 195 or something like that, I can't remember the number but I looked it up on the Fcc website. The transmitter only has a few hundred feet more coverage area than a transmitter exactly measured at 250 microvolts at 3 meters. And according to all my research it's part 15 approved. So I'm no going to worry about it, there's no need to be afraid of the Fcc. If they ever show up and make me shut it down I will comply. No big deal.


 
Posted : 19/11/2023 9:01 am
 pete2169
(@pete2169)
Posts: 28
Eminent Member Registered
Topic starter
 

The Retekess TR508 FM transmitter has a special stock Antenna with a unique special antenna connector. (Reverse treads I believe). So a coax cable or any other antenna can't attach to the transmitter. That's what makes it approved under part 15, Subpart C 195,  I believe. 


 
Posted : 19/11/2023 9:17 am
 pete2169
(@pete2169)
Posts: 28
Eminent Member Registered
Topic starter
 

So the Retekess TR598 is approved and certified by the FCC. It may have a little better performance and a  slightly bigger coverage area than a transmitter exactly measured at exactly 250 microvolts at 3 meters. But it's approved for part 15 use. If the FCC ever stops by and does not like it I'll shut it down. No big deal.  besides I'm in a rural area. I don't think anybody even knows my transmission exists. Kind of like a tree falling in the woods doesn't make it sound that there is anyone to hear it.


 
Posted : 19/11/2023 9:26 am
 pete2169
(@pete2169)
Posts: 28
Eminent Member Registered
Topic starter
 

of course now that the FCC is controlled by a Democrat majority of officers. They're probably not going to be as nice as they used to be. They used to have an equal amount of Democrats and Republicans in control. 2 and 2. But now that's changed. It's 3 democrat officials to 1 Republican. The Democrats hate freedom of speech. So that probably means they're going to come down harder on part 15 broadcasters.


 
Posted : 19/11/2023 9:41 am
Mark
 Mark
(@mark)
Posts: 2330
Member Moderator
 

It's Ok to discuss the pros and cons of the certification but please remember to keep respect for each other. Democrats and Republicans and free speech is a different subject and has nothing to do with the certification.
Rightly or wrongly the transmitter in discussion here has a part 15 certification and such label affixed and can be looked up and verified in the FCC data base and the lab's stamp of approval is published.
Showing a part 15 certified transmitter to an agent shows that you got this assuming it's a legal product and you were trying to be legal. It does have the FCC's stamp of approval for unlicensed use and you can't fault someone for buying and using it on that basis.


 
Posted : 19/11/2023 10:05 am
1
Roy
 Roy
(@wefr)
Posts: 358
Honorable Member Registered
 

@mark 👍


 
Posted : 19/11/2023 10:22 am
 pete2169
(@pete2169)
Posts: 28
Eminent Member Registered
Topic starter
 

Is there anyway to delete this thread? How do I remove and end this membership? I appreciate all the information I got here, it was helpful but I don't need anything here anymore. Other people don't like my messages, I didn't know what can be said and not said. Mark can you delete all my messages?

 


 
Posted : 19/11/2023 3:33 pm
 Zi
(@gone)
Posts: 105
Estimable Member Registered
 

@pete2169 I appreciate your postings. Don't go ... I'm sure I've upset people too but sometimes things I've posted get taken the wrong way.


 
Posted : 19/11/2023 3:44 pm
1
Mark
 Mark
(@mark)
Posts: 2330
Member Moderator
 

@pete2169 I don't know why you want to leave. Want to rethink this? As for your discussion about the Retekess transmitter I supported your getting it and backed you on the fact it has a certification and you have every right to assume it's legal with a valid number on the label.
The other forum member was just discussing it with you and I stepped in and just made sure respect prevailed.

You are a valuable member and as moderator I see no reason for you to leave.

If you want to delete your posts go to edit post on your posts. If delete is not there then shade in blue and delete that way and see if that does it but this was a valuable discussion and informative to other members for information so I won't delete the posts. As moderator I only delete posts that are against the rules or offensive.

If you want to leave(I hope not) go to your profile and you can select leave the forum but I am not going to do it.


This post was modified 3 years ago 6 times by Mark
 
Posted : 19/11/2023 3:49 pm
2
 Zi
(@gone)
Posts: 105
Estimable Member Registered
 

@mark I agree with you.  No matter what opinion a person has there will always be someone who disagrees. I hope he changes his mind.


 
Posted : 19/11/2023 3:57 pm
1
 Zi
(@gone)
Posts: 105
Estimable Member Registered
 

@mark I agree with you.  No matter what opinion a person has there will always be someone who disagrees. I hope he changes his mind.


 
Posted : 19/11/2023 4:46 pm
 Zi
(@gone)
Posts: 105
Estimable Member Registered
 

I'm sure I've upset some people by transmitting on 1710 ... That's where I do experimental work...And 1560 . 99 percent of the time I'm not on either frequency.  13560 sw is legal in the USA.   I don't take it personally any criticism.  Right now I'm 260 miles south at our other house....On 1620 ,a bit less range .


 
Posted : 19/11/2023 4:51 pm
Page 4 / 4 Prev
Forum Jump:
  Previous Topic
Next Topic  
Share:
Forum Information
Recent Posts
Unread Posts
Tags
  • 13 Forums
  • 7,756 Topics
  • 63.6 K Posts
  • 23 Online
  • 2,249 Members
Our newest member: electronic
Latest Post: Here's a look at why we do processing and what each function does.
Forum Icons: Forum contains no unread posts Forum contains unread posts
Topic Icons: Not Replied Replied Active Hot Sticky Unapproved Solved Private Closed

Primary Sidebar

Online Members

 No online members at the moment

Recent Posts

  • Mark

    Here's a look at why we do processing and what each function does.

    Shows for FM but applies to AM also.

    By Mark , 3 days ago

  • Mark

    RE: Early 80s Realty Radio' AM transmitters

    I don't think the audio quality would be that good on t...

    By Mark , 2 weeks ago

  • RichPowers

    RE: Early 80s Realty Radio' AM transmitters

    I was very tempted to buy them both, they were dirt che...

    By RichPowers , 2 weeks ago

  • RichPowers

    RE: Part 15 Too Restrictive for Automakers

    @mark I had to pause when you mentioned "15 minute citi...

    By RichPowers , 2 weeks ago

  • Mark

    RE: Part 15 Too Restrictive for Automakers

    Your last part.... "It all very interesting but all I...

    By Mark , 2 weeks ago

Recent Topics

  • Mark

    Here's a look at why we do processing and what each function does.

    By Mark 3 days ago

  • RichPowers

    Part 15 Too Restrictive for Automakers

    By RichPowers 2 weeks ago

  • RichPowers

    From Virtue to Vice - Music Morality

    By RichPowers 3 weeks ago

  • RichPowers

    affordable DAC Impressive Versatility “audiophile quality” Promising Big performance at small price

    By RichPowers 3 weeks ago

  • RichPowers

    New Canadian Resident?

    By RichPowers 3 weeks ago

Topic Tags

  • Carl Blare3
  • KDX RADIO3
  • WINDOZE3
  • Transmitter2
  • Radio Phvern2
  • station upgrade2
  • archive.org2
  • playlist2
  • Zara Radio2
  • #SW2101
View all tags (75)

Copyright © 2026 · Part15.org · Log in

‹›×

    ‹›×