Good to see you back.

I doubt very much if it was anything you did, Thelegacy. Hobbybroadcaster has been paranoid about security and information sharing for years (ever si...

BillyBurg, I would think that the entire point of having a public website is to make it reasonably accessible. Why should I, as a potential user, cha...

Reading this thread prompted me to make one of my sporadic visits to Hobbybroadcaster (for a site that supposedly promotes Part 15 broadcasting, I fin...

That begs the question as to why anyone would want to participate in a site that is so difficult to join and then use. You can't keep your preferred ...

Well, you see, you use both a top hat and a counterpoise. That's not just a wire up a PVC pipe. It likely contributes to the good range you're seein...

Can you show us a video of your setup, including antenna?

This thread is supposed to be about the Range Extender, not changing the Part 15 rules. If you must discuss desired rule changes (which have been dis...

If something is in the public domain, you can do anything you want with it. So there would be no fees for broadcasting the material. It's really unf...

You're correct in stating that copyright issues being the cause of the disappearance of otrrlibrary was speculation on my part. However, it is inform...

The fact as to whether a song creator is alive or dead is not the issue here. Perhaps I haven't been clear. Old time radio shows were owned solely b...

Two things: 1. Time does matter. Why should people other than the creator(s) of the song benefit, i.e., why should the estate, which consists of pe...