• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Part15

Part15

License Free, legal, low-power radio broadcasting

  • About Us
  • Forums
  • Resources
  • Members
  • Contact Us
  • Log In
Forums
Main Category
Transmitter Talk
Vectronics VEC 1290...
 
Notifications
Clear all

Vectronics VEC 1290 K

 
Transmitter Talk
Last Post by Radio Joe 8 years ago
4 Posts
3 Users
0 Reactions
815 Views
RSS
 Radio Joe
(@radio-joe)
Posts: 68
Estimable Member Registered
Topic starter
 

Has anyone built the Vectronics VEC 1290 K AM transmitter?

This Vectronics VEC 1290 kit a simple low cost LC no PLL transmitter and looks good. I am Just wondering how stable it is as far as holding frequency and also audio quality. I checked the schematic and there is not much out of the norm for small transmitters like this, and it has to be very low power as there is no amplification after the oscillator stage. The review I read says that the audio quality is good but that doesn’t tell me much.

If anyone can tell me just how flat the response is and how it compares to a commercial broadcast signal in respect to audio quality it would be great!.  I know a person can’t ask for too much for $29 but you never know on these things!  I like the way they have a built in antenna matching system though. So if anyone has built this transmitter and can give a firsthand account on comparison to on air sound of a standard broadcast I would like to see what you have to say.

Thank you

Radio Joe


 
Posted : 17/01/2019 11:12 pm
Mark
 Mark
(@mark)
Posts: 2330
Member Moderator
 

Haven't built but found a video with a sound check that may be helpful.


 
Posted : 18/01/2019 12:41 am
 Carl Blare
(@carl-blare)
Posts: 2621
Famed Member Registered
 

The Vectronics AM Transmitter

Good video, Mark, I watched with interest.

Also I found you can download the PDF of the Manual from

The Vectronics Website

The schematic is shown and the first feature that disqualifies this unit in my opinion is the simple VFO (Variable Frequency Oscillator) which must be hand-tuned to frequency and predictably will drift and need to be reset all the time.

What there is of it is well planned but seems to be designed somewhat under FCC part 15 specs, i.e., a 6-foot antenna rather than 10-feet.

It would be a place to start in the kindergarten of electronic education.


 
Posted : 18/01/2019 1:34 am
 Radio Joe
(@radio-joe)
Posts: 68
Estimable Member Registered
Topic starter
 

I thought the review was good, the person did a nice job of letting people know how things went. I thought the audio quality was good! the hum he talks about thats normal, I have it here on all my AM transmtters, has to do with house wiring and the rf mixing with line current in the house wiring. I might have t add this transmitter to my collection see what it does. Audio seemed full and had good bottom and top end.

Radio Joe


 
Posted : 18/01/2019 1:35 am
Forum Jump:
  Previous Topic
Next Topic  
Share:
Forum Information
Recent Posts
Unread Posts
Tags
  • 13 Forums
  • 7,756 Topics
  • 63.6 K Posts
  • 10 Online
  • 2,249 Members
Our newest member: electronic
Latest Post: Part 15 Too Restrictive for Automakers
Forum Icons: Forum contains no unread posts Forum contains unread posts
Topic Icons: Not Replied Replied Active Hot Sticky Unapproved Solved Private Closed

Primary Sidebar

Online Members

 No online members at the moment

Recent Posts

  • RichPowers

    Ultra long range Part 15 broadcasting (to space)

    While car makers appear to be opting for the licenced s...

    By RichPowers , 5 hours ago

  • Mark

    Here's a look at why we do processing and what each function does.

    Shows for FM but applies to AM also.

    By Mark , 4 days ago

  • Mark

    RE: Early 80s Realty Radio' AM transmitters

    I don't think the audio quality would be that good on t...

    By Mark , 2 weeks ago

  • RichPowers

    RE: Early 80s Realty Radio' AM transmitters

    I was very tempted to buy them both, they were dirt che...

    By RichPowers , 2 weeks ago

  • RichPowers

    RE: Part 15 Too Restrictive for Automakers

    @mark I had to pause when you mentioned "15 minute citi...

    By RichPowers , 2 weeks ago

Recent Topics

  • Mark

    Here's a look at why we do processing and what each function does.

    By Mark 4 days ago

  • RichPowers

    Part 15 Too Restrictive for Automakers

    By RichPowers 2 weeks ago

  • RichPowers

    From Virtue to Vice - Music Morality

    By RichPowers 3 weeks ago

  • RichPowers

    affordable DAC Impressive Versatility “audiophile quality” Promising Big performance at small price

    By RichPowers 3 weeks ago

  • RichPowers

    New Canadian Resident?

    By RichPowers 3 weeks ago

Topic Tags

  • Carl Blare3
  • KDX RADIO3
  • WINDOZE3
  • Transmitter2
  • Radio Phvern2
  • station upgrade2
  • archive.org2
  • playlist2
  • Zara Radio2
  • #SW2101
View all tags (75)

Copyright © 2026 · Part15.org · Log in

‹›×

    ‹›×