Private Contacts

I was at least one Part15us member recently sending a personal e-mail to C. Blare, to which so far he has not offered a relevant reply either in private or in public.

The reason for my choice of privacy was that the content of my very short e-mail was not a "Forum Topic," but an (expected) exchange that I thought he would prefer to be kept out of the public realm.

However with Mr Blare's permission, I will post it in this thread -- or for my part, he is free to do that himself if he wishes.

"exchange that I thought he would prefer to be kept out of the public realm."

That sounds like a threat of some kind.

Why not post the text of my e-mail, and let readers decide for themselves if it constitutes a "threat?"

You are a manipulative person with an agenda, in the midst of an ad hominem attack.

As I said in the beginning, I am not running a social e-mail site, therefore nothing posted there is admissible here.

What we wonder about is your agenda.

My private e-mail to you was not at all social in nature. Rather I asked you if you were seeking proven answers in response to the engineering suppositions you post.

Well that makes sense, yet, it is the function provided here on this website. There's no need for me to receive information via another channel. I don't understand that part of it.

Rich wrote: I asked you if you were seeking proven answers in response to the engineering suppositions you post.

Carl Blare answered: Well that makes sense, yet, it is the function provided here on this website. etc
__________

OK, then would you be willing to answer that question publicly, here?

See what I mean.

That's an odd question.

It makes it sound like I'm being cornered over something more than your oddly put question implies.

To quote myself, "It is the function provided here on this website."

In other words, proven answers ARE given in response to .... "engineering suppositions?"... that may not be germane.... I wouldn't put it that way....

Why can't I find the drama being posed in this whole approach?

I think I just answered (for the second time) your peculiar question both publicly and here.

But, but, but, are you casting yourself as the fountain of "proven answers"?

What about the other participants in these (social) discussions. Are their answers less proven than yours?

Why would the authority of proof be questioning whether I want "the proven"? Is that silly?

Carl Blare wrote: In other words, proven answers ARE given in response to .... "engineering suppositions?"... that may not be germane.
___________

So proven answers applying to a given subject may not be germane, in your opinion?

Can you please supply a valid example or two?

That was one of the better twists of what was actually said that I have heard since last Saturday, but absurd.

I will be in deliberation until Monday at which time this inane discussion can resume.

C. Blare: "I will be in deliberation until Monday"

At this point I think readers have all they need to draw their own conclusions as to the contents of this thread, and I'm sure the moderators here would be happy to see it drop.

just in case our moderators haven't figured it out yet "rich" is our old friend "tricky dick" better known a "rfry" re-registered under a new username and he is world renowned for berating people via email. I'm pretty sure I'll be a recipient of one of his rants shortly when he reads this posting outing who he really is. our friendly moderators are decent people who use banning as a very last resort. i hope though in this case there will be an exception unless he straightens up and has a major 180 in attitude.

just in case our moderators haven't figured it out yet "rich" is our old friend "tricky dick" better known a "rfry" re-registered under a new username...

Anyone clicking on my site name "Rich" will see that this is the same name I signed up with on this site over 6 years ago.