• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Part15

Part15

License Free, legal, low-power radio broadcasting

  • About Us
  • Forums
  • Resources
  • Members
  • Contact Us
  • Log In
Forums
Main Category
temp
Pretection against ...
 
Notifications
Clear all

Pretection against jamming...

 
temp
Last Post by Anonymous 22 years ago
3 Posts
2 Users
0 Reactions
462 Views
RSS
 broadcastman
(@broadcastman)
Posts: 9
Eminent Member Registered
Topic starter
 

Pretection against jamming...

I understand that a Part 15 AM station has no frequency protection as do licensed stations.

However, if someone starts and establishes a Part 15 Station, if not from an FCC perspective, then from a legal perspective, can he be protected from someone maliciously trying to interfere with his signal?


 
Posted : 16/10/2004 10:32 pm
 Anonymous
(@Anonymous)
Posts: 0
 

No. But you could always get in touch with the person running the station and make them stop. If you were REALLY established you could take them to court.


 
Posted : 17/10/2004 4:28 am
 Anonymous
(@Anonymous)
Posts: 0
 

From what I understand, there is a general FCC rule that prohibits superfluous transmissions. I wonder if that could be used to shut down a Part 15 jammer?

I don't know if you could get the FCC to move on it. A court may be sympathetic, but getting into Federal district court is definitely a big time effort. State courts have concurrent jurisdiction on Federal law, but the big thing is getting the court to take the case, and then adequately establishing your case. You would have to teach the court a lot. I dunno about any other legal alternative, as radio is seen to be inherently interstate commerce and totally Federal province.

Contacting the jammer would be an important first step to either solve the problem or show that you have tried to solve this privately.


 
Posted : 17/10/2004 5:19 am
Forum Jump:
  Previous Topic
Next Topic  
Share:
Forum Information
Recent Posts
Unread Posts
Tags
  • 13 Forums
  • 7,756 Topics
  • 63.6 K Posts
  • 10 Online
  • 2,249 Members
Our newest member: electronic
Latest Post: Part 15 Too Restrictive for Automakers
Forum Icons: Forum contains no unread posts Forum contains unread posts
Topic Icons: Not Replied Replied Active Hot Sticky Unapproved Solved Private Closed

Primary Sidebar

Online Members

 No online members at the moment

Recent Posts

  • RichPowers

    Ultra long range Part 15 broadcasting (to space)

    While car makers appear to be opting for the licenced s...

    By RichPowers , 1 day ago

  • Mark

    Here's a look at why we do processing and what each function does.

    Shows for FM but applies to AM also.

    By Mark , 5 days ago

  • Mark

    RE: Early 80s Realty Radio' AM transmitters

    I don't think the audio quality would be that good on t...

    By Mark , 2 weeks ago

  • RichPowers

    RE: Early 80s Realty Radio' AM transmitters

    I was very tempted to buy them both, they were dirt che...

    By RichPowers , 2 weeks ago

  • RichPowers

    RE: Part 15 Too Restrictive for Automakers

    @mark I had to pause when you mentioned "15 minute citi...

    By RichPowers , 2 weeks ago

Recent Topics

  • Mark

    Here's a look at why we do processing and what each function does.

    By Mark 5 days ago

  • RichPowers

    Part 15 Too Restrictive for Automakers

    By RichPowers 2 weeks ago

  • RichPowers

    From Virtue to Vice - Music Morality

    By RichPowers 3 weeks ago

  • RichPowers

    affordable DAC Impressive Versatility “audiophile quality” Promising Big performance at small price

    By RichPowers 3 weeks ago

  • RichPowers

    New Canadian Resident?

    By RichPowers 3 weeks ago

Topic Tags

  • Carl Blare3
  • KDX RADIO3
  • WINDOZE3
  • Transmitter2
  • Radio Phvern2
  • station upgrade2
  • archive.org2
  • playlist2
  • Zara Radio2
  • #SW2101
View all tags (75)

Copyright © 2026 · Part15.org · Log in

‹›×

    ‹›×