• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Part15

Part15

License Free, legal, low-power radio broadcasting

  • About Us
  • Forums
  • Resources
  • Members
  • Contact Us
  • Log In
Forums
Main Category
temp
Part 15 in the 160-...
 
Notifications
Clear all

Part 15 in the 160-190 kHz Band

 
Page 2 / 2 Prev
temp
Last Post by Anonymous 13 years ago
19 Posts
2 Users
0 Reactions
2,994 Views
RSS
 Anonymous
(@Anonymous)
Posts: 0
 

Hello Mighty!

The question of LW bandwidth has been discussed before, and I think we figured out that since LW is not officially used in the Homeland there is no set bandwidth.

The next thing I don't remember is what the LW bandwidth is in Europe. Is it 9kHz like their medium wave? Is it 5kHz like I think international shortwave is?

But here on the big island of North America we can apparently use any bandwidth, EXCEPT that Rich has pointed out that the physics of Part 15 will only be able to do about 2kHz, so we seem to have only one choice.


 
Posted : 07/05/2013 1:31 pm
 Anonymous
(@Anonymous)
Posts: 0
 

The spacing interval of the carriers of LW and MW AM broadcast stations in some areas of the globe is 9 kHz.

However the FCC does not grant licenses for AM broadcast stations in the LW band.  The FCC grants AM broadcast station licenses only in the MW band from 530 to 1700 kHz, spaced at carrier frequency intervals of 10 kHz.

But in any case, the maximum r-f bandwidth that can be transmitted using DSB AM without mutual interference by stations on adjacent channels in their respective areas of the globe is only 1/2 of their channel spacing.

So if the transmit systems of each station supported it, stations with 9 kHz carrier separation would have an upper limit of ~4.5 kHz for their program audio at the output of a compatible AM receiver, without having significant interference from adjacent channels -- if they all restricted their r-f bandwidths to 9 kHz.

For those conditions with 10 kHz spacing and 10 kHz r-f bandwidth, the upper audio limit would be ~5 kHz.


 
Posted : 07/05/2013 2:34 pm
 Anonymous
(@Anonymous)
Posts: 0
 

Earlier I posted, "But in any case, the maximum r-f bandwidth that can be transmitted using DSB AM without mutual interference by stations on adjacent channels in their respective areas of the globe is only 1/2 of their channel spacing."

To correct my earlier post, I should have written "... the maximum a-f bandwidth ..."  

My apologies.


 
Posted : 07/05/2013 5:09 pm
 Anonymous
(@Anonymous)
Posts: 0
 

The maximum allowable audio bandwidth for US AM broadcast stations is 10.2 kHz, which corresponds to an RF bandwidth of 20.4 kHz. Stations that are within ground wave propagation distance are not assigned to adjacent 10 kHz channels by the FCC, but skywave propagation can result in interference between distant stations on adjacent channels. This is acceptable under the rules.

Broadcast stations can optionally elect to restrict their bandwidth to concentrate power in the voice range. This is an option, not an FCC requirement. Studies have shown that the average modern AM radio receiver has a 3 dB audio bandwidth of only 2.5 kHz! So, broadcasting with a 10 kHz audio bandwidth is a waste even for a music station. This situation drives broadcasters to reduce their audio bandwidth significantly below the 10.2 kHz limit.

All this information is documented in the NATIONAL RADIO SYSTEMS COMMITTEE document NRSC-G100-A, Bandwidth Options for Analog AM Broadcasters, September 2012. You can read it here: http://www.nrscstandards.org/SG/NRSC-G100-A.pdf

 Be sure to read over the extensive supplemental document in ANNEX 1, after page 18 of the main document. There are detailed results of bandwidth measurements of about 30 commercial AM receivers. It's a real eye opener! Bring back the GE SuperRadio III!


 
Posted : 08/05/2013 6:54 pm
Page 2 / 2 Prev
Forum Jump:
  Previous Topic
Next Topic  
Share:
Forum Information
Recent Posts
Unread Posts
Tags
  • 13 Forums
  • 7,756 Topics
  • 63.6 K Posts
  • 10 Online
  • 2,249 Members
Our newest member: electronic
Latest Post: Part 15 Too Restrictive for Automakers
Forum Icons: Forum contains no unread posts Forum contains unread posts
Topic Icons: Not Replied Replied Active Hot Sticky Unapproved Solved Private Closed

Primary Sidebar

Online Members

 No online members at the moment

Recent Posts

  • RichPowers

    Ultra long range Part 15 broadcasting (to space)

    While car makers appear to be opting for the licenced s...

    By RichPowers , 17 hours ago

  • Mark

    Here's a look at why we do processing and what each function does.

    Shows for FM but applies to AM also.

    By Mark , 4 days ago

  • Mark

    RE: Early 80s Realty Radio' AM transmitters

    I don't think the audio quality would be that good on t...

    By Mark , 2 weeks ago

  • RichPowers

    RE: Early 80s Realty Radio' AM transmitters

    I was very tempted to buy them both, they were dirt che...

    By RichPowers , 2 weeks ago

  • RichPowers

    RE: Part 15 Too Restrictive for Automakers

    @mark I had to pause when you mentioned "15 minute citi...

    By RichPowers , 2 weeks ago

Recent Topics

  • Mark

    Here's a look at why we do processing and what each function does.

    By Mark 4 days ago

  • RichPowers

    Part 15 Too Restrictive for Automakers

    By RichPowers 2 weeks ago

  • RichPowers

    From Virtue to Vice - Music Morality

    By RichPowers 3 weeks ago

  • RichPowers

    affordable DAC Impressive Versatility “audiophile quality” Promising Big performance at small price

    By RichPowers 3 weeks ago

  • RichPowers

    New Canadian Resident?

    By RichPowers 3 weeks ago

Topic Tags

  • Carl Blare3
  • KDX RADIO3
  • WINDOZE3
  • Transmitter2
  • Radio Phvern2
  • station upgrade2
  • archive.org2
  • playlist2
  • Zara Radio2
  • #SW2101
View all tags (75)

Copyright © 2026 · Part15.org · Log in

‹›×

    ‹›×