Notifications
Clear all
Topic starter
Posted : 31/03/2016 5:59 am
Having for so long heard how superb the Inovonics 222 has long been for AM processing I am a bit unsettled by the new 223, based on its Features List.
It apparently does what the 222 does, but many more things besides.
In fact it has such multiple uses that I worry that it could be confusing to those in charge of setting it up, could easily be mis-set, and does not claim to be improved over the 222 for AM use.
I'd prefer to have separate devices specific to the application.
Posted : 01/04/2016 7:55 am
I am unsettled by the fact that you might be unsettled. I hope this is not catching.
Posted : 01/04/2016 8:24 am
