• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Part15

Part15

License Free, legal, low-power radio broadcasting

  • About Us
  • Forums
  • Resources
  • Members
  • Contact Us
  • Log In
Forums
Main Category
temp
MFJ-259B Antenna An...
 
Notifications
Clear all

MFJ-259B Antenna Analyzer Modification

 
temp
Last Post by Anonymous 13 years ago
3 Posts
2 Users
0 Reactions
746 Views
RSS
 mojoe
(@mojoe)
Posts: 25
Trusted Member Registered
Topic starter
 

First, a word of warning. If the information in this post doesn't make sense to you, you probably shouldn't be modifying your antenna analyzer. These things cost a bit of money and can be easily damaged by such a modification if you are not careful.

The MFJ-259B and similar instruments are very useful for trimming or adjusting antennas to resonance. The MFJ-259B is great for Amateur Radio purposes, but it doesn't go low enough to cover the Medium Wave frequencies (like the AM Broadcast band) or even lower for LOWFER people.

I found that several people had posted on the internet about how to modify the MFJ-259B to cover these lower frequencies. One such set of instructions is a PDF from the link below. I liked this one because it has pictures, showing very clearly which trace to cut on the circuit board.

http://njdtechnologies.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/Modifying-an-MFJ259B.pdf

I didn't go to extremes and add several ranges, as shown in the PDF. I just wanted to cover the entire AM band. This meant that I needed to add two inductors. One just won't do it. The parts I used are listed below. These values of inductance worked for me. You may find you need slightly different values. Note that there is quite a bit of overlap between the two ranges.

120 uH - This gets me 840 KHz to 1.8 MHz
470 uH - This gets me 490 KHz to 1.0 MHz
A SP3T toggle switch

When soldered together and mounted, the Up position on the toggle switch is shorted and gives me the original range of 1.8 to 4.0 MHz on the rotary band switch. The Center and Down positions on the toggle switch give me the two lower ranges (leaving the rotary band switch at 1.8 to 4.0). The other rotary band switch positions are not affected by the toggle switch and added inductors.

So, now I can use my MFJ-259B to trim antennas, tune matching circuits, etc. on the AM band.

BTW, I did a quick and dirty check of a single frequency in the AM band, to make sure that the oscillator actually was close to the frequency that was being displayed. With a Sony digital PLL AM radio on that frequency, I slowly tuned the MFJ-259B. As I could hear the zero beat of the oscillator on the radio, the frequency reading was dead on. I may check it more extensively later with some calibrated equipment, but this quick check tells me that the modified unit is working just fine.

Joe


 
Posted : 10/07/2013 7:11 pm
 Anonymous
(@Anonymous)
Posts: 0
 

A means to measure the feedpoint impedance of an antenna system is a great way to assess and adjust an antenna for optimum performance. At resonance the reactive component of the impedance is 0 ohms and the resistive component is a good indicator of the effectiveness of the ground scheme as well as a means to check for changes over time. I use a two channel scope with a current transformer for this purpose and the modified analyzer as detailed in the linked article should serve the same purpose well. Thanks for the link and please let us know of your experiences with this.

I sometimes wonder if the voltage peaking method used to adjust antenna tuning with some transmitters actually works as intended. In my experience, voltage peaks can be observed when way off resonance. Knowing the actual impedance is a reliable method of tuning.

Neil


 
Posted : 11/07/2013 7:55 am
 Anonymous
(@Anonymous)
Posts: 0
 

Do you have a copy of that pdf that website no longer there.


 
Posted : 10/10/2013 7:03 pm
Forum Jump:
  Previous Topic
Next Topic  
Share:
Forum Information
Recent Posts
Unread Posts
Tags
  • 13 Forums
  • 7,756 Topics
  • 63.6 K Posts
  • 5 Online
  • 2,249 Members
Our newest member: electronic
Latest Post: Part 15 Too Restrictive for Automakers
Forum Icons: Forum contains no unread posts Forum contains unread posts
Topic Icons: Not Replied Replied Active Hot Sticky Unapproved Solved Private Closed

Primary Sidebar

Online Members

 No online members at the moment

Recent Posts

  • RichPowers

    Ultra long range Part 15 broadcasting (to space)

    While car makers appear to be opting for the licenced s...

    By RichPowers , 14 hours ago

  • Mark

    Here's a look at why we do processing and what each function does.

    Shows for FM but applies to AM also.

    By Mark , 4 days ago

  • Mark

    RE: Early 80s Realty Radio' AM transmitters

    I don't think the audio quality would be that good on t...

    By Mark , 2 weeks ago

  • RichPowers

    RE: Early 80s Realty Radio' AM transmitters

    I was very tempted to buy them both, they were dirt che...

    By RichPowers , 2 weeks ago

  • RichPowers

    RE: Part 15 Too Restrictive for Automakers

    @mark I had to pause when you mentioned "15 minute citi...

    By RichPowers , 2 weeks ago

Recent Topics

  • Mark

    Here's a look at why we do processing and what each function does.

    By Mark 4 days ago

  • RichPowers

    Part 15 Too Restrictive for Automakers

    By RichPowers 2 weeks ago

  • RichPowers

    From Virtue to Vice - Music Morality

    By RichPowers 3 weeks ago

  • RichPowers

    affordable DAC Impressive Versatility “audiophile quality” Promising Big performance at small price

    By RichPowers 3 weeks ago

  • RichPowers

    New Canadian Resident?

    By RichPowers 3 weeks ago

Topic Tags

  • Carl Blare3
  • KDX RADIO3
  • WINDOZE3
  • Transmitter2
  • Radio Phvern2
  • station upgrade2
  • archive.org2
  • playlist2
  • Zara Radio2
  • #SW2101
View all tags (75)

Copyright © 2026 · Part15.org · Log in

‹›×

    ‹›×