• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Part15

Part15

License Free, legal, low-power radio broadcasting

  • About Us
  • Forums
  • Resources
  • Members
  • Contact Us
  • Log In
Forums
Main Category
temp
FCC-Permissible Ope...
 
Notifications
Clear all

FCC-Permissible Operation for Unlicensed Use of 1710 kHz

 
Page 1 / 4 Next
temp
Last Post by Anonymous 10 years ago
53 Posts
2 Users
0 Reactions
6,243 Views
RSS
 Rich
(@rich)
Posts: 207
Reputable Member Registered
Topic starter
 

Below the line is a paste from the FCC Rules applying to the legal limits for unlicensed systems transmitting on a carrier frequency of 1710 kHz.

Note that for transmissions having an r-f bandwidth of 10 kHz as defined there, the maximum e-m field intensity existing 30 meters from the transmit antenna is limited to about 17 µVm.

That 17 µVm field intensity is below the 1710 kHz ambient r-f noise level at most outdoor receive locations -- where it could not provide useful reception even at 30 meters, let alone to indoor receivers in a city neighborhood having a diameter of a mile or more.

OTOH, the field intensity from a transmit system fully compliant with §15.219 can GREATLY exceed 17 µV/m at a distance of 30 meters.

Even an unlicensed system operating at ~1400 kHz and below and fully compliant with FCC §15.209 is permitted to radiate fields greater than 17 µV/m a distance of 30 meters.

Given all this, why would one choose to operate a Part 15 AM compliant system using a carrier frequency of 1710 kHz?

_________________________

e-CFR data is current as of September 7, 2016

Title 47 → Chapter I → Subchapter A → Part 15 → Subpart C → §15.223


Browse Previous | Browse Next

Title 47: Telecommunication
PART 15—RADIO FREQUENCY DEVICES
Subpart C—Intentional Radiators


§15.223   Operation in the band 1.705-10 MHz.

(a) The field strength of any emission within the band 1.705-10.0 MHz shall not exceed 100 microvolts/meter at a distance of 30 meters. However, if the bandwidth of the emission is less than 10% of the center frequency, the field strength shall not exceed 15 microvolts/meter or (the bandwidth of the device in kHz) divided by (the center frequency of the device in MHz) microvolts/meter at a distance of 30 meters, whichever is the higher level. For the purposes of this section, bandwidth is determined at the points 6 dB down from the modulated carrier. The emission limits in this paragraph are based on measurement instrumentation employing an average detector. The provisions in §15.35(b) for limiting peak emissions apply.

(b) The field strength of emissions outside of the band 1.705-10.0 MHz shall not exceed the general radiated emission limits in §15.209.


 
Posted : 09/09/2016 4:05 pm
 Anonymous
(@Anonymous)
Posts: 0
 

No one from part15(dot)us is transmitting on 1710 kHz.

Why are you posting about a non-existant problem?


 
Posted : 09/09/2016 4:16 pm
 Anonymous
(@Anonymous)
Posts: 0
 

LOL at Carl Blare!

Anything Rich posts is in the interest of part 15.

Don't be so hard on the guy.

Bruce.


 
Posted : 09/09/2016 4:31 pm
 Anonymous
(@Anonymous)
Posts: 0
 

People post on forums and other people post replies then more people come along and post their thoughts.

As MrBruce says, "Anything Rich posts is in the interest of part 15."

That's what's good about it.


 
Posted : 09/09/2016 4:58 pm
 Anonymous
(@Anonymous)
Posts: 0
 

Per Mr Blare:  No one from part15(dot)us is transmitting on 1710 kHz.

Below is a link (active as of just now) that states otherwise, per its title:  Druid Hills Radio AM 1710.

http://www.druidhillsradio.com/


 
Posted : 09/09/2016 4:58 pm
 Anonymous
(@Anonymous)
Posts: 0
 

That's old business from way back... Mr. Druid Hills now operates an LPFM station for a genuine campus.

His legacy part 15 website hasn't been updated to reflect changes.

I'm almost positive.


 
Posted : 09/09/2016 5:02 pm
 Anonymous
(@Anonymous)
Posts: 0
 

Per Mr Blare: "Mr. Druid Hills now operates an LPFM station for a genuine campus."

Note that (licensed) LPFM stations are not the same as (unlicensed) campus broadcast setups.

Campus broadcasting analogous to FCC §15.221 for the AM band is not permitted in the FM broadcast band by any paragraph(s) of FCC Part 15.


 
Posted : 09/09/2016 5:23 pm
 Anonymous
(@Anonymous)
Posts: 0
 

Mr Blare posted:  "His legacy part 15 website hasn't been updated to reflect changes.  I'm almost positive."

I'll wait for Mr Druid Hills to respond, thanks.


 
Posted : 09/09/2016 5:28 pm
 Anonymous
(@Anonymous)
Posts: 0
 

Police power, albeit in the micro-arena of milli-watts, can be a huge head trip.

Do you have a special costume you wear for your part 15 crack-downs?


 
Posted : 09/09/2016 5:55 pm
 Anonymous
(@Anonymous)
Posts: 0
 

Carl:  "Police power, albeit in the micro-arena of milli-watts, can be a huge head trip.  Do you have a special costume you wear for your part 15 crack-downs?"

Good grief, man, don't you have something else to do with your time?  You comment on almost every post on every subject...holy smokes, you are annoying.  Give it a rest.  I can anticipate your reply (you can't resist)--'well, just don't read it'.  Some people here are serious and post things worthwhile--you are the exception.  RARELY do you contribute anything substantial.  Your fellow member bashing needs to stop--your very childish comments have run their course. 


 
Posted : 09/09/2016 6:07 pm
 Anonymous
(@Anonymous)
Posts: 0
 

MorningDJ it's good to have you back after a long absence.

You don't need to like me... I like YOU!

Rich's minion.


 
Posted : 09/09/2016 6:12 pm
 Anonymous
(@Anonymous)
Posts: 0
 

MorningDJ does have a point Carl, Rich (and I am not making a joke here) does have a lot of beneficial things to contibute to this hobby.

Some might find him annoying, but he does make us think more with our brains, which is the best part to think with to get ahead in this hobby.

He is just a person, who feels if you make a statement, specially regarding legal part 15 broadcasting, back it up with proof, here-say is what confuses people who are trying to abid by the laws of their given Government.

I see his (Rich) points and concerns as being valid ones. At least Rich backs up anything he posts or says with reliable proof, I'll give him that.

Bruce.


 
Posted : 09/09/2016 6:42 pm
 Anonymous
(@Anonymous)
Posts: 0
 

If MorningDJ and MrBruce would agree to come on board as my forum advisors maybe I could produce better posts.

Get together and consider that proposal, then let me know.

In the meantime Rich has once again thrown the topic out of focus.

The topic is part 15 use of 1710 kHz.


 
Posted : 09/09/2016 6:53 pm
 Anonymous
(@Anonymous)
Posts: 0
 

But Rich IS the TOPIC CREATOR. He can do as he wishes with it.

Bruce.


 
Posted : 09/09/2016 7:54 pm
 Anonymous
(@Anonymous)
Posts: 0
 

Actually, I was wondering the same thing as Carl - what is the point of the original post?

I agree that Rich has much to contribute.

But this seems to be a topic in search of a reason to exist.  Other than pure information, of course.


 
Posted : 09/09/2016 8:29 pm
Page 1 / 4 Next
Forum Jump:
  Previous Topic
Next Topic  
Share:
Forum Information
Recent Posts
Unread Posts
Tags
  • 13 Forums
  • 7,740 Topics
  • 63.5 K Posts
  • 51 Online
  • 2,249 Members
Our newest member: electronic
Latest Post: 7 Beatles Misheard Lyrics
Forum Icons: Forum contains no unread posts Forum contains unread posts
Topic Icons: Not Replied Replied Active Hot Sticky Unapproved Solved Private Closed

Primary Sidebar

Online Members

 No online members at the moment

Recent Posts

  • Mark

    RE: 7 Beatles Misheard Lyrics

    Many songs have I heard something other than the actual...

    By Mark , 1 day ago

  • Mark

    RE: 7 Beatles Misheard Lyrics

    Have you heard this?

    By Mark , 1 day ago

  • RichPowers

    Unique AM Transmitter

    Here one I've not seen before. they're $69.50 on eBay, ...

    By RichPowers , 1 day ago

  • RichPowers

    7 Beatles Misheard Lyrics

    As far as I'm concerned this article is ridiculous, I d...

    By RichPowers , 2 days ago

  • Mark

    RE: Newly Discovered Robert Johnson in Stunning Clarity

    @richpowers Sounds good.

    By Mark , 2 days ago

Recent Topics

  • RichPowers

    Unique AM Transmitter

    By RichPowers 1 day ago

  • RichPowers

    7 Beatles Misheard Lyrics

    By RichPowers 2 days ago

  • RichPowers

    Public Domain Feature Films about Radio

    By RichPowers 3 days ago

  • RichPowers

    Speed Limit 17.3mph

    By RichPowers 5 days ago

  • ArtisanRadio

    Artisan Radio Pivots Again

    By ArtisanRadio 5 days ago

Topic Tags

  • Carl Blare3
  • KDX RADIO3
  • WINDOZE3
  • Transmitter2
  • Radio Phvern2
  • station upgrade2
  • archive.org2
  • playlist2
  • Zara Radio2
  • Carrier Current1
View all tags (74)

Copyright © 2026 · Part15.org · Log in

‹›×

    ‹›×