• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Part15

Part15

License Free, legal, low-power radio broadcasting

  • About Us
  • Forums
  • Resources
  • Members
  • Contact Us
  • Log In
Forums
Main Category
temp
Don’t operate on ch...
 
Notifications
Clear all

Don’t operate on channel in a stations protected contour

 
Page 2 / 2 Prev
temp
Last Post by Anonymous 11 years ago
24 Posts
2 Users
0 Reactions
2,603 Views
RSS
 Anonymous
(@Anonymous)
Posts: 0
 

Well I have plans on just using the TH5.0 with the wire antenna. I might use my tinfoil trick if it works. I just want to know what to do if I do get a NOUO. (I know someone will say that they will likely never show up due to how weak it would be but you never know). I guess I could just say that I was using it to transmit music around my house. From looking at NOUO reports I have only seen a few on the AM band. It seems to me they target the FM band more. 


 
Posted : 21/10/2015 10:05 pm
 Anonymous
(@Anonymous)
Posts: 0
 

Tin Foil on AM? Huh?


 
Posted : 22/10/2015 4:02 am
 Anonymous
(@Anonymous)
Posts: 0
 

As it happens tin foil is very wide band in most uses and can even be used down in the long wave band, although you'd need qite a large shipment of it and there might be some problem in a windstorm with flying tin foil.


 
Posted : 22/10/2015 4:47 am
 Anonymous
(@Anonymous)
Posts: 0
 

Yep tested it on my cheap FM worked just fine up to .5 miles of range. Only $7 for the transmitter also. I am going to give it a shot on AM with the TH5.0. If that doesn’t work then all well 😛

 


 
Posted : 22/10/2015 11:24 am
 Anonymous
(@Anonymous)
Posts: 0
 

Think of an NOUO as a very stern warning. So long as you comply and shut down operations it won't escalate into a NAL.


 
Posted : 22/10/2015 1:45 pm
 Anonymous
(@Anonymous)
Posts: 0
 

So if you TX was over a bit and you got a NOUO and shut down and then move to a different address and start again with an adjusted transmitter or different one but this time you never went over you'd never get bothered again.  Well how about you make the adjustments and your 100% on target with the 250 uV/m for FM or for AM you were right on target with the antenna and ground rules.  Would you be allowed to operate again at the same address or do you have to find a new location?


 
Posted : 22/10/2015 4:24 pm
 Anonymous
(@Anonymous)
Posts: 0
 

All the FCC really wants you to do is operate legally or not at all.

Yes, so long as you are within part 15 restrictions you can resume operations. Heck some FCC inspectors will help you.


 
Posted : 22/10/2015 5:08 pm
 Anonymous
(@Anonymous)
Posts: 0
 

Well that is good to know.  So if my AM station was over in some way or I had an issue with a legal 15:239 FM Transmitter an inspector could do something to adjust the TX and make it legal and I'd be able to operate again?  Too bad that station in Origon didn't try harder to see what the FCC didn't like and get help with their station.


 
Posted : 22/10/2015 5:24 pm
 Anonymous
(@Anonymous)
Posts: 0
 

An FCC inspector is under no obligation (and most likely won't) make adjustments to a system to make it compliant.

There is no such thing as a "legal 15.239 FM transmitter" since the rules apply to the field strength produced and not to the equipment used to produce same. The rules apply to the operation of the station and not to what it is.

The "Oregon station" did try to make modifications and work with the FCC on this. See http://www.part15.us/forum/part15-forums/general-discussion/fcc-issues-rare-ground-lead-nouo Essentially what happened is the station was operating with a ground lead exceeding the 15.219 limits and so part 15.209 field strength limits then governed. The owner worked with the transmitter manufacturer who provided a choke coil for the ground lead and the FCC inspector revisited the site and did tests. The result was that the inspector determined the station was not compliant with or without the ground choke coil. The owner, the FCC inspector, and the transmitter manufacturer went out of their way to find an acceptable solution so it is not accurate to say that any of them should have tried harder.

Neil


 
Posted : 22/10/2015 11:42 pm
Page 2 / 2 Prev
Forum Jump:
  Previous Topic
Next Topic  
Share:
Forum Information
Recent Posts
Unread Posts
Tags
  • 13 Forums
  • 7,740 Topics
  • 63.5 K Posts
  • 53 Online
  • 2,249 Members
Our newest member: electronic
Latest Post: 7 Beatles Misheard Lyrics
Forum Icons: Forum contains no unread posts Forum contains unread posts
Topic Icons: Not Replied Replied Active Hot Sticky Unapproved Solved Private Closed

Primary Sidebar

Online Members

 No online members at the moment

Recent Posts

  • Mark

    RE: 7 Beatles Misheard Lyrics

    Many songs have I heard something other than the actual...

    By Mark , 1 day ago

  • Mark

    RE: 7 Beatles Misheard Lyrics

    Have you heard this?

    By Mark , 1 day ago

  • RichPowers

    Unique AM Transmitter

    Here one I've not seen before. they're $69.50 on eBay, ...

    By RichPowers , 2 days ago

  • RichPowers

    7 Beatles Misheard Lyrics

    As far as I'm concerned this article is ridiculous, I d...

    By RichPowers , 2 days ago

  • Mark

    RE: Newly Discovered Robert Johnson in Stunning Clarity

    @richpowers Sounds good.

    By Mark , 2 days ago

Recent Topics

  • RichPowers

    Unique AM Transmitter

    By RichPowers 2 days ago

  • RichPowers

    7 Beatles Misheard Lyrics

    By RichPowers 2 days ago

  • RichPowers

    Public Domain Feature Films about Radio

    By RichPowers 3 days ago

  • RichPowers

    Speed Limit 17.3mph

    By RichPowers 5 days ago

  • ArtisanRadio

    Artisan Radio Pivots Again

    By ArtisanRadio 5 days ago

Topic Tags

  • Carl Blare3
  • KDX RADIO3
  • WINDOZE3
  • Transmitter2
  • Radio Phvern2
  • station upgrade2
  • archive.org2
  • playlist2
  • Zara Radio2
  • Carrier Current1
View all tags (74)

Copyright © 2026 · Part15.org · Log in

‹›×

    ‹›×