• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Part15

Part15

License Free, legal, low-power radio broadcasting

  • About Us
  • Forums
  • Resources
  • Members
  • Contact Us
  • Log In
Forums
Main Category
temp
Any Standalone Shou...
 
Notifications
Clear all

Any Standalone Shoutcast Streamer That Will Not Pickup Every Sound From Your Computer??

 
Page 3 / 5 Prev Next
temp
Last Post by Anonymous 9 years ago
75 Posts
2 Users
0 Reactions
14.1 K Views
RSS
 Anonymous
(@Anonymous)
Posts: 0
 

I tried another version of Radioboss it still does the same crap after 3 to 3 1/2 days it plays a track for 30 seconds to 1min then the audio drops 70% lower this program is junk I have tired 4 different version. Still have not found a free or decent priced computer with decent specs running XP.  If I do not find another computer in 5 to 7 days I am done with my internet station.  I have spent way to much time testing out Radio audiomation programs to keep going. 


 
Posted : 20/03/2017 11:59 am
 Anonymous
(@Anonymous)
Posts: 0
 

DJboutit says:  "If I do not find another computer in 5 to 7 days I am done with my internet station."

Carl Blare advises:  Give yourself 3-months, DJ... 7-days is not enough time.

Part of this hobby is the trial and error and the exploration and the experimentation that it takes to make everything work.

Working with computers can be like trying to build a house out of gravel... ir keeps sliding apart.

I'm just about to start experimenting with RadioBoss... I'll be happy to post my experience here for others to learn, but I'm getting into it kind of slow because of other projects also sharing time.


 
Posted : 20/03/2017 12:43 pm
 Anonymous
(@Anonymous)
Posts: 0
 

Try e-bay.  At least you get some sort of warranty from e-bay if the seller is selling it as 'Used' and it doesn't work.  You really have to know what you're looking at if you try to buy 2nd hand at pawn shops, garage sales, thrift shops, etc.

I'd go for a laptop - if it's more than a few years old, few want it and generally you can find them for around $50, maybe a bit more (the really old ones generally go for a lot more, as they're considered somewhat 'collectable' - the only collectable thing about most of them is dust).  I recently purchased an HP Elitebook (a very decent computer, by the way) with docking station, decent specs, capable of running even Windows 7/8, and paid on a Buy It Now listing C$60 (well under US$50).


 
Posted : 20/03/2017 6:19 pm
 Anonymous
(@Anonymous)
Posts: 0
 

You have something else going on. Try collecting stamps.


 
Posted : 20/03/2017 6:45 pm
 Anonymous
(@Anonymous)
Posts: 0
 

Would Zararadio work on Windows or would X86 or x64 version of XP better??


 
Posted : 22/03/2017 10:19 am
 Anonymous
(@Anonymous)
Posts: 0
 

I don't think I've ever loaded Zara on a x64 system, at least not that I recall. Almost every computer I've ever used Zara on has been with XP on an older laptop or desktop, with proccesing ranges from petium 1 to 3, and as low as 256mb ram, but usually more like 500-800 but's that's usually all. They all purred along fine with no problem for weeks and even months without a reboot.

However I should mention they were all usually dedicated just for Zara, and I didn't use them for anything else. Also they were "compact" versions of XP, in that I had essentially hacked out all aspects of the operating system which were uneeded and burned a new XP install cd (there are numerous tutorials online on how to do this) --But I just mention that, not any of that is neccessary, but what it does is streamline to the operating system to bare bones and thus makes it run a lot smoother and faster, I use to install XP on obsolete 486 machines like this with great success..

But I digress, so disregard all that, and don't let any of that throw you off.. The whole point is that Zara doesn't require much at all and will run like a champ. I advise to simply use whatever XP machine you can get your hands on and your basically set to go.


 
Posted : 22/03/2017 12:23 pm
 Anonymous
(@Anonymous)
Posts: 0
 

Zara itself doesn't need much, but when it needs the cycles, it really wants them - if it doesn't get them, you'll get audio stuttering.

What is best for you really depends on what else you're running on the computer.  If you're running audio processing software, streaming encoding or serving, etc., then you really do require something newer than XP as your operating system. XP doesn't multitask all that well, and if your computer has more than 1 core, it doesn't take advantage of the multiple cores.  Vista or even Windows 7 would be better choices.  And an X64 machine would give you some extra cycles.


 
Posted : 22/03/2017 1:01 pm
 Anonymous
(@Anonymous)
Posts: 0
 

Good points. But I just want to mention, although I heard an occassional mention of this "stuttering" or other problem.. I can not recall ever experiencing something like that myself in over ten years time, and I've always utilized old rather under-powered computers.

It never fails to surprise me when I hear people say something like that!


 
Posted : 22/03/2017 1:19 pm
 Anonymous
(@Anonymous)
Posts: 0
 

Zara runs fine on x64. The darned thing will literally run on anything. In my experience Zara has not been very demanding on resources but can certainly stutter if something else on the PC starts using the available CPU. This problem can be completely avoided by using a pro-grade soundcard. (The audio files are loaded on the card's RAM and not dependant on the CPU or PC RAM.)

I have only had Zara stutter on a Toshiba Netbook running Win7 Starter.


 
Posted : 23/03/2017 3:49 am
 Anonymous
(@Anonymous)
Posts: 0
 

Yep, Mighty! I have a Toshiba Satellite L745 laptop with Windows 7. It WILL NOT run Zara. I loaded erased and loaded it 3 times. I load the Play List, hit "play" and it blinks. Nothing else. Nothing plays. My Dell 1500 laptop with XP runs it flawlessly. The sound card is shot on that, though.

Doug


 
Posted : 23/03/2017 4:49 am
 Anonymous
(@Anonymous)
Posts: 0
 

I never did find out why that Toshiba had issues with Zara, it would also not run edcast very long either.


 
Posted : 23/03/2017 5:38 am
 Anonymous
(@Anonymous)
Posts: 0
 

I am going to a place that sells used computers I hope Zara will work with Windows 2000 that is all I have.  I might have to formant the computer and install 2000. 


 
Posted : 23/03/2017 10:09 am
 Anonymous
(@Anonymous)
Posts: 0
 

Yes, both Zara 1.4.4 and 1.6 work well with Windows 2000.  In fact, it probably runs better than on XP and newer operating systems.  If you want to generate an Internet stream, you'll have to use Oddcast Standalone (as EdCast Standalone doesn't work on 2000).

The biggest problem you might have is to find other Windows 2000 software to support your station, as it's getting very old right now (and maybe device drivers if you have other hardware to support).


 
Posted : 23/03/2017 10:59 am
 Anonymous
(@Anonymous)
Posts: 0
 

I got a Compaq DC5800 with 4gb ram and 250gb hd $70. It took like 90 min to get it to load I pull out the video card and wifi card now it loads.  It will take 3 to 5 hrs to format and install windows 2000. 


 
Posted : 23/03/2017 1:59 pm
 Anonymous
(@Anonymous)
Posts: 0
 

I used to own one of those.  It will do nicely, particularly under Windows 2000.  Just make sure it has Windows 2000 drivers for it (chipset, audio, etc.).


 
Posted : 23/03/2017 3:56 pm
Page 3 / 5 Prev Next
Forum Jump:
  Previous Topic
Next Topic  
Share:
Forum Information
Recent Posts
Unread Posts
Tags
  • 13 Forums
  • 7,756 Topics
  • 63.6 K Posts
  • 16 Online
  • 2,249 Members
Our newest member: electronic
Latest Post: Part 15 Too Restrictive for Automakers
Forum Icons: Forum contains no unread posts Forum contains unread posts
Topic Icons: Not Replied Replied Active Hot Sticky Unapproved Solved Private Closed

Primary Sidebar

Online Members

 No online members at the moment

Recent Posts

  • RichPowers

    Ultra long range Part 15 broadcasting (to space)

    While car makers appear to be opting for the licenced s...

    By RichPowers , 4 hours ago

  • Mark

    Here's a look at why we do processing and what each function does.

    Shows for FM but applies to AM also.

    By Mark , 4 days ago

  • Mark

    RE: Early 80s Realty Radio' AM transmitters

    I don't think the audio quality would be that good on t...

    By Mark , 2 weeks ago

  • RichPowers

    RE: Early 80s Realty Radio' AM transmitters

    I was very tempted to buy them both, they were dirt che...

    By RichPowers , 2 weeks ago

  • RichPowers

    RE: Part 15 Too Restrictive for Automakers

    @mark I had to pause when you mentioned "15 minute citi...

    By RichPowers , 2 weeks ago

Recent Topics

  • Mark

    Here's a look at why we do processing and what each function does.

    By Mark 4 days ago

  • RichPowers

    Part 15 Too Restrictive for Automakers

    By RichPowers 2 weeks ago

  • RichPowers

    From Virtue to Vice - Music Morality

    By RichPowers 3 weeks ago

  • RichPowers

    affordable DAC Impressive Versatility “audiophile quality” Promising Big performance at small price

    By RichPowers 3 weeks ago

  • RichPowers

    New Canadian Resident?

    By RichPowers 3 weeks ago

Topic Tags

  • Carl Blare3
  • KDX RADIO3
  • WINDOZE3
  • Transmitter2
  • Radio Phvern2
  • station upgrade2
  • archive.org2
  • playlist2
  • Zara Radio2
  • #SW2101
View all tags (75)

Copyright © 2026 · Part15.org · Log in

‹›×

    ‹›×