• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Part15

Part15

License Free, legal, low-power radio broadcasting

  • About Us
  • Forums
  • Resources
  • Members
  • Contact Us
  • Log In

Uncategorized

WCRV antenna adventures

August 23, 2004 by scwis Leave a Comment

I’ll try a story about my antenna.

I may have to tell about the antenna in a couple of installments…

I’ll try a story about my antenna.

I may have to tell about the antenna in a couple of installments…

I’ll also say from the get go that I may say something that may not pertain to part 15 proper, but the story is about the antenna, not the operation of my radio station.

Before starting the part 15, my group tested a couple well known transmitters. I don’t have to name them, you know them. This group consists of actual AM engineers, so besides my opinion, their opinion counted.

The popular transmitters were only good with a good antenna. Both tx’s recommended a CB-type whip antenna. And, if you like 500 feet of pure signal, they are just fine.

I ended up purchasing a sstran transmitter kit, which one of our engineers built for me. It came with the traditional 3 foot wire antenna, and to tell the truth, the transmitter put out exactly the same signal that the popular, expensive ones put out with a CB whip. I knew a CB whip isn’t tuned to the AM band, and it certainly isn’t tunable.

Phil Boylan, who owns sstran tx company was very helpful with my setup. But I had a ton of questions, and one of them led to Phil doing two things; redesigning the tx so that it could accept a coil/base loaded antenna, and designing such an antenna. We wanted this to remain part 15 acceptable.

I use an antenna very very similar to what Phil designed. It consists of a coil, which is magnetic wire which includes taps, wound around a piece of pvc pipe. The antenna itself is copper pipe, which sits upon pvc, which acts as an insulator.

Basically, your antenna wire runs to a selected tap on this coil, the top of the coil attaches to the copper pipe. The copper pipe antenna is adjustable, built with about one foot of 3/4″ pipe, and inside sits about 9 feet of 1/2″ pipe (these lengths are estimates, actual footage to remain legal is on the sstran.com site.

And that is key; in order to make the antenna “resonant” to your frequency, you can raise up, or lower your antenna, more accurately than cutting a piece of wire, more or less rendering you off the air.

My first incarnation of this antenna was built inside during the winter. I live in a metal mobile home, and I set it against the house to test it. I got nowhere, but the reason was I was up against a metal house.

When spring came, I purchased a 10 foot iron pipe, 4 inches across, and also purchased various pieces of pvc to attach to it in order for it to accept the (about) 2″ pvc adapter which holds the copper antenna pipe.

This put together, I dug a good hole in the ground and cemented the iron pipe into the ground. With the iron pipe, my antenna stood about 25 feet high at the tip, and I placed it about 12 feet from the house.

The biggest trick to this installation is making sure the iron pipe is really cemented into the ground, and that you have a ladder whereby you can reach the point where 3/4″ and 1/2″ pipe come together. That is where you tune the antenna.

I also should mention that the coil needs to be as close to this copper pipe junction as possible. In my case, I actually ran the coil and tx from the ground, encased in a large Rubbermaid tote, because at the time I had no way to mount it way up there. (See?…I learned from my mistake; I couldn’t climb up that pole!)

I’ve been in AM radio, and I know that radials are helpful. In my case, my backyard has a tendency to remain damp and in most cases, wet. A wet ground is excellent for AM radio broadcasting, so this area was perfect.

With 100mW broadcasting, radials can help your signal. In standard AM broadcasting, there are 360 radials per tower, which could run into quite a bit of copper, and then quite a bit of money. In our case, just several, to notice the difference is required, and that may be just 10 radials.

I bought copper strand wire, and a hose clamp. The clamp went around the base of the iron support pipe. You want to make sure you can see the iron, and not any paint, so you may have to sand it.

I laid the copper wire radials out in equal lengths, about 10 feet each, and separated equally, like a clock. I buried them a couple inches into the ground and then soldered them to the iron pipe, tightening it all down with that pipe clamp.

After some tuning, (that is another story) I found phenomenal results.

Well, here is the story; I didn’t have a Field Strength meter, so the best I could do was to tune off frequency, try to tune the antenna, STEP BACK, and listen.

The louder I got off frequency, the better I was, and I did this til I got a signal that covered the entire high band. I was on 1540 khz, with 1590 down the road, and I killed 1590 for a mile. So I knew I had it right.

Now comes the sad news; My trailer park “outlawed” antennas. So, it had to come down if I was to stay living here, and down it came. I thought of everything…using wires around the house, up the house, etc, etc, and I did try some of these things knowing they would not work.

And they didn’t.

So, I had to build this antenna all over again, and DISGUISE it.

In short, I decided to build a pvc pipe flagpole over it, and even now, Ol’ Glory hangs beside my house on what contains my copper AM radio antenna.

Does it work?

Yes it does, although at this time I’m having some problems related to a couple ground shorts; tonight I may have solved the problem, but the point is that the pvc does not kill your signal if you have to hide an antenna.

I had to make the flagpole look like a flagpole and not an antenna, and I had to hide the transmitter and coil, so I built a box around it. You should see me working inside that box, and no one really knows what I’m up to. Ultimately it will be a planter when everything is soldered up right.

It is a good idea for someone in a position like mine, where you want your station on the air, but you are not allowed to have an antenna.

This is a great hobby for me, and when I achieve this goal, which I will, I’ll probably move onto something else. And that something else is a SECRET!! 🙂 Well, for now anyway. Share your antenna ideas with us!

The cost of building the antenna: The magnetic wire cost the most, about $25 bucks but I had enough to
build two coils and had extra, and btw, it was a good thing I bought extra; I ruined the first coil.
The parts for the antenna cost about 30 bucks, but I needed everything and you may have some pvc or copper laying around.

Once built, you can move it, adjust it, move it again. Be careful, the smallest pvc part is very fragile, just like an insulator,otherwise, it is easy to build and is kind of a fun project.

Filed Under: Uncategorized

My part 15 station – UPDATED with links 8/24

August 23, 2004 by scwis Leave a Comment

Another happy Part 15 Broadcaster! Be sure to share your stories – happy or sad – with Part15.us!
Our latest contributor writes:

After reading as much as possible about part 15 radio, I took the plunge…

Another happy Part 15 Broadcaster! Be sure to share your stories – happy or sad – with Part15.us!
Our latest contributor writes:

After reading as much as possible about part 15 radio, I took the plunge…

I purchased a Gizmo FCC compliant 100mw AM transmitter and went on the air. I get good range (1.75-2 miles radius easy despite lots of trees and a low height above average terrain), I am legal, and having lots of fun.

Despite articles describing the importance of height, I put my antenna in the attic along with the transmitter as I felt that I could make any needed adjustements there, and this has proven to be a good decision.

I was going to get a copper pipe to make an antenna, when I noticed my old uhf yagi antenna in the corner of the attic, so I just turned it to a vertical position, and let that be my (5′ more or less) antenna.

Then I bought a round trash bucket at wal mart, wound a few hundred feet of wire around it to make a loading coil, used a few twists for tuning taps, and attached it to my upright yagi. I based this loosely on some articles I had read.

Then reading more about grounding, I found an article about elevated radials (from 1938!), so I strung about 8- 50′ elevated copper wires as elevated ground radials ( in the attic of course), used a TWO FOOT LEAD, and let that be my ground.

To check my radiated power, I applied an amperage rated LED to the coil, and later a multimeter to check current, and then used ohm’s law to calculate approximate radiated power: It seemed compliant, at no more than 100mw… Editor’s note – The regs actually specify 100mw power into the final stage, but this app looks good!

Considerations: you need to fiddle with the antenna and ground to get distance. Just a slight difference in connections (use the tuning taps), will make all the difference.

The level of sound into the transmitter makes a difference in range– despite reports advising otherwise, I find running my computer driven audio feed into the transmitter on the high side of volume gives more range even if it leads to a little over compression w/in 150 feet of the transmitter. Editor’s note – YES – modulation intensity is a big factor in AM broadcasting.

And you must have a sensitive radio on the receiving end (good car radio w/ antenna). Lots of fun-not lots of $$$

That 1938 story I referenced regarding elevated ground radials was really from 1937 article imbedded in an article at www.commtechrf.com/ambroadcast.htm.

By the way, I neglected to mention my capacitance hat, made out of a paper plate wrapped in aluminum foil and then mashed between my vertical uhf tv antenna turned part 15 am antenna, and the roof.

Filed Under: Uncategorized

Receiving Part 15 Transmitters

August 9, 2004 by scwis Leave a Comment

Here’s a great article on tuning in our little peanut whistles – consider sharing this with your potential listeners!

Receiving Part 15 Transmitters

Glenn A. Elliott, 08 August 2004

Successful radio reception depends on factors at both the transmitter and at the receiver.

Here’s a great article on tuning in our little peanut whistles – consider sharing this with your potential listeners!

Receiving Part 15 Transmitters

Glenn A. Elliott, 08 August 2004

Successful radio reception depends on factors at both the transmitter and at the receiver.

Filed Under: Uncategorized

A summary of part 15 rules for all bands

August 3, 2004 by scwis Leave a Comment

There’s been some discussion in the Forums lately about broadcasting on alternate bands. Member tregonsee has graciously provided a general discussion of all of the pertinent FCC regulations in his “Digest of Part 15.” Please click below to read more, and be sure to visit the Forums and discuss your impressions!

There’s been some discussion in the Forums lately about broadcasting on alternate bands. Member tregonsee has graciously provided a general discussion of all of the pertinent FCC regulations in his “Digest of Part 15.” Please click below to read more, and be sure to visit the Forums and discuss your impressions!

Digest of Part 15, FCC Regulations (in effect as of June 2004) Applying to Low-Power Over-the-Air Transmitters

NOTE: This is an unofficial document. While major efforts have been made to insure that it accurately reflects Part 15, no warranty of accuracy is made. This is also a digest of Part 15 and thus not complete, and only reflects two out of six subparts.

01. Part 15 applies to:

a. Intentional radiators (low-power transmitters intended to transmit a modulated radio signal “through the air”), AND

b. Unintentional radiators (devices designed to generate radio frequency energy but not transmit it through the air, including radio receivers and “digital devices” such as computers and peripherals), AND

c. Incidental radiators (devices not designed to generate radio signals but that do so as a by-product of their operation, such as motors and light dimmers and switches).

02. Interference and Use of Part 15 Devices

a. Part 15 devices must not cause harmful interference (that disrupts licensed radio services), even if the devices conform to the Part 15 technical standards.

b. Users of Part 15 devices must accept any interference caused by licensed radio services.

c. Any user of any Part 15 device must stop operating the device if notified by the FCC that the device is causing harmful interference, and may not use the device until the interference problem is corrected.

d. Users of Part 15 devices are not protected against each other’s interference.

e. Users of Part 15 devices do not have and can not obtain any right to use any device, frequency, or emission type.

03. Except for authorized law enforcement operations, Part 15 devices may not be used to listen to or record private conversations without the consent of all parties concerned.

04. Part 15 devices must be constructed per good design and manufacturing practices to not emit any signal that is not in accordance with FCC Regulations.

a. Part 15 devices must suppress extraneous signals as much as practicable. In general:

(1) No extraneous signal can be stronger than the desired or intended signal.

(2) Extraneous signals must usually be at least 20 dB below the level of the desired signal.

(3) All signals less than 20 dB below the level of the desired signal must be contained within an authorized band, or a bandwidth within that band.

b. No user-accessible controls can allow the device to operate in violation of the FCC Regulations.

c. No radiator should emit any stronger signal than what is needed for reliable operation.

d. A commercially-made Part 15 transmitter that comes with an antenna permanently fixed to the transmitter enclosure may not be used with another antenna except a substantially identical replacement.

e. NOTE: If antenna length is limited, Part 15 does not mention how it is measured (except 49.82-49.90 MHz, only single-element antenna under alternate standards). This is a special concern for the 160-190 kHz and 510-1705 kHz bands, where a “capacity hat” or “top hat” is often used at the top of the antenna. However, in several inquiries, the FCC has not objected to measuring antenna length from the base of the antenna to the end of one of the “hat” radials (the longest if all are not equal). The rim of the “hat” is not considered, nor are loading coils.

05. This notice must be affixed to the enclosure of a Part 15 device that is home-built or is not allowed to carry a different notice or identifier:

Filed Under: Uncategorized

New members, station updates and an important typo!

August 2, 2004 by scwis Leave a Comment

We’ve had a great response to our reformatted Forums and many visitors have registered. There has also been an exciting increase in our requests for station listings – it looks like many new stations are going on the air! Finally, visitor tregonsee let us know about a serious typo in our Part 15 FM antenna article in the Library. Thank you tregonsee – the old, erroneous info is in red, the corrected info is in blue. tregonsee has also provided almost a dozen station updates – check them out!

We’ve had a great response to our reformatted Forums and many visitors have registered. There has also been an exciting increase in our requests for station listings – it looks like many new stations are going on the air! Finally, visitor tregonsee let us know about a serious typo in our Part 15 FM antenna article in the Library. Thank you tregonsee – the old, erroneous info is in red, the corrected info is in blue. tregonsee has also provided almost a dozen station updates – check them out!

Filed Under: Uncategorized

A candle in the darkness shines bright

July 27, 2004 by scwis Leave a Comment

The Baltimore Sun recently carried a remarkable article about a Part 15 AM station that is making a difference in Annapolis.

The Sun has kindly allowed us to link directly to the story – read this incredible news item by following the direct link here.

The Baltimore Sun recently carried a remarkable article about a Part 15 AM station that is making a difference in Annapolis.

The Sun has kindly allowed us to link directly to the story – read this incredible news item by following the direct link here.

Filed Under: Uncategorized

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 20
  • Page 21
  • Page 22
  • Page 23
  • Page 24
  • Go to Next Page »

Primary Sidebar

Online Members

 No online members at the moment

Recent Posts

  • RichPowers

    Ultra long range Part 15 broadcasting (to space)

    While car makers appear to be opting for the licenced s...

    By RichPowers , 21 hours ago

  • Mark

    Here's a look at why we do processing and what each function does.

    Shows for FM but applies to AM also.

    By Mark , 5 days ago

  • Mark

    RE: Early 80s Realty Radio' AM transmitters

    I don't think the audio quality would be that good on t...

    By Mark , 2 weeks ago

  • RichPowers

    RE: Early 80s Realty Radio' AM transmitters

    I was very tempted to buy them both, they were dirt che...

    By RichPowers , 2 weeks ago

  • RichPowers

    RE: Part 15 Too Restrictive for Automakers

    @mark I had to pause when you mentioned "15 minute citi...

    By RichPowers , 2 weeks ago

Recent Topics

  • Mark

    Here's a look at why we do processing and what each function does.

    By Mark 5 days ago

  • RichPowers

    Part 15 Too Restrictive for Automakers

    By RichPowers 2 weeks ago

  • RichPowers

    From Virtue to Vice - Music Morality

    By RichPowers 3 weeks ago

  • RichPowers

    affordable DAC Impressive Versatility “audiophile quality” Promising Big performance at small price

    By RichPowers 3 weeks ago

  • RichPowers

    New Canadian Resident?

    By RichPowers 3 weeks ago

Topic Tags

  • Carl Blare3
  • KDX RADIO3
  • WINDOZE3
  • Transmitter2
  • Radio Phvern2
  • station upgrade2
  • archive.org2
  • playlist2
  • Zara Radio2
  • Carrier Current1
View all tags (74)

Copyright © 2026 · Part15.org · Log in