• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Part15

Part15

License Free, legal, low-power radio broadcasting

  • About Us
  • Forums
  • Resources
  • Members
  • Contact Us
  • Log In

scwis

Receiving Part 15 Transmitters (Revised)

September 9, 2004 by scwis Leave a Comment

Here’s a great article on tuning in our little peanut whistles – consider sharing this with your potential listeners!”

Receiving Part 15 Transmitters

Glenn A. Elliott, 08 August 2004

(Revised Friday 27 August 2004)

“Picking up these ‘peanut whistles,’ especially on the fringe, is going to require some effort…

Here’s a great article on tuning in our little peanut whistles – consider sharing this with your potential listeners!”

Receiving Part 15 Transmitters

Glenn A. Elliott, 08 August 2004

(Revised Friday 27 August 2004)

“Picking up these ‘peanut whistles,’ especially on the fringe, is going to require some effort…

Summary:

A. Picking up these “peanut whistles,” especially on the fringe, is going to require some effort by you.

B. Not picking up noise and interference can be as important as picking up signal. Walk around your house with a pocket radio, tuned to a weak station or no station, and listen to the noise level. Put receivers and antennas away from noisy spots, and avoid, move, or dispose of noisy devices.

C. All receivers aren’t equal. Lots can pick up signals fairly well. The tough part is separating out what you want.

D. There’s no substitute for a good antenna. For FM, a “beam” mounted outdoors and high is the best. Next best is that beam mounted inside the attic of a wood house, and after that is the good old “T” antenna (stretched out and up high, in a window if your house isn’t wood, not crumpled up on the floor). On AM, try a simple manufactured “loop” first.


=================================


Successful radio reception depends on factors at both the transmitter and at the receiver. Transmitter performance depends on both the transmitter power and the antenna. Part 15 transmitters are limited in this regard, either by overall signal strength limits or by specific restrictions on both power and antenna construction.


There are no FCC restrictions on the receiving setup, although zoning or restrictive covenants can limit receiving antenna construction. Still, much can be enhanced on the receiving end, and the nature of Part 15 requires this investment except at the closest distances.


This article is meant to be introductory, not exhaustive. Some technical terms and concepts may be mentioned that require further study. There is considerable material available on radio reception equipment and techniques.


1. Noise and interference can be problems at any frequency, although they generally become more evident on AM versus FM signals, and at lower frequencies.


a. Thunderstorms and even the atmosphere itself make substantial noise below 2 MHz (2000 kHz). For a given transmitter (running below 2MHz), receiving setup, and distance, fringe reception may be possible from late fall through early spring, when thunderstorms are absent and the atmosphere is “quieter,” but not during the rest of the year.


b. There are numerous noise sources in and near your home. Computers, fluorescent lights, electric motors and appliances, and any devices that use a microprocessor (to make them more functional or “smart”) are definitely candidates. Telephone, cable TV, and power lines can also act as huge antennas to bring noise into your home. Most AM broadcast receivers have antennas inside the receiver case, so moving an AM receiver around within your home and changing its orientation (lining it up north-south, east-west, or in between) will often affect how much noise (and signal) it picks up. In fact, you can walk around inside your house with a pocket AM (or AM/FM) radio, tuned to either a weak station or no station, to find noisy spots (to avoid) or devices (to avoid or move). The noise you hear on an AM or FM radio can also affect other receivers and indoor antennas.


c. Frequencies below 30 MHz (30,000 kHz) will display varying degrees of skywave or “skip” long-distance propagation. Frequencies below 2 MHz will skip in at night. The operator of a Part 15 transmitter in the AM broadcast band will virtually always account for this when selecting the operating frequency. However, if you notice that another station skips in on the same frequency at night (“co-channel interference”), the Part 15 operator would probably like to know. Reorienting the AM receiver (if it has an internal “rod” antenna) or using a loop antenna (see below) will also help in this situation unless the Part 15 and the skipping stations are on or near the same line of direction.


d. Other devices besides broadcast transmitters operate under Part 15. Basically, Part 15 devices are not protected from interference with each other. The broadcast transmitter may be able to change to another frequency if a number of people are affected. However, you may have to use a directional antenna or an “active noise canceller” to reduce interference from a local Part 15 device.


2. All receivers are definitely not the same, either in performance or features.


a. Many if not most Part 15 AM broadcasters operate between 1600 kHz and 1700 kHz (in the “extended” AM band that the FCC authorized in 1991). AM broadcast receivers produced before 1990 (some even later) generally cannot receive above 1600 kHz. The same appears to be true for some manufactured AM active antennas (including active loops) and passive loops. The McKay-Dymek DA5 tuned active ferrite-rod loop is one of these.


b. Sensitivity is the ability of the receiver to produce useable output from weak signals. It is usually measured in microvolts (uV), and a lower number means better performance. In stereo FM broadcast receivers, sensitivity is especially important regarding the ability to hear a station in stereo instead of mono (better stereo sensitivity will almost always mean better mono sensitivity as well). Receiver sensitivity varies but many if not most receivers have adequate sensitivity.


c. Selectivity is the ability of a receiver to reject signals that are close to the frequency of the desired station, especially when the adjacent signals are stronger than the desired signal. Receivers vary in selectivity more than sensitivity.


d. Bandwidth refers to the “width” of frequencies that will be picked up around the desired frequency. Cheaper receivers, especially FM and AM broadcast receivers, will only have a single bandwidth filter. Better receivers have two or more bandwidth filters to offer the option of picking up less of the signal (lower fidelity) in exchange for less noise or less interference from stations on adjacent frequencies.


e. Better AM broadcast and shortwave receivers will also have an “RF gain” control, which adjusts how much the incoming radio signal is amplified. This is important, because the receiver’s RF (radio frequency) amplifier will also amplify any noise within the receiver bandwidth, and will also tend to pick up adjacent signals more at higher “gain” (amplification) levels. Maximum RF gain is not always desirable.


f. Part 15 transmitters are also allowed to operate in the frequency bands 160-190 kHz, 13.553-13.567 MHz, 26.96-27.28 MHz, and 49.82-49.90 MHz (and others not covered here). Shortwave receivers can usually pick up the middle two bands.


(1) A good “general coverage” receiver can probably pick up the 160-190 kHz band, although you may get better reception by using an “LF [low frequency] converter” which receives the LF signal and moves it up into a higher shortwave band where the receiver has better performance. The converter output is connected by a cable to the receiver antenna input (or one of them).


(2) Operation above 30 MHz is often FM, and a good scanner should receive an FM transmitter in the 49.82-49.90 MHz band.


(3) Part 15 transmitters in any of these bands may use single sideband (SSB, a derivative of AM). Good general coverage or shortwave receivers should be able to receive SSB on the lower three bands, but receivers that can pick up AM or SSB above 30 MHz are harder to find (although definitely not impossible).


g. Two good AM broadcast band receivers are the GE SupeRadio (AM/FM; 4 models – original, II, & Plus all discontinued and only go to 1600, III currently made; see this FAQ) and the C. Crane Company CCRadio (discontinued, AM only) or CCRadio plus (currently made, by Sangean for CCC; adds FM, TV 2-13 sound, and WeatherRadio). Both radios are portable and mainly built for good AM performance. The audio section in the CCRadio and CCRadio plus is optimized for speech, so music might not sound as good as on some other AM receivers. Some reviews have preferred the SupeRadio III over the CCRadio plus (the SR3 is about $50-60 new, the CCR+ over double that), and state that the FM/TV/WxR performance of the CCRadio plus is only average.


h. A good FM broadcast band receiver is the Boston Acoustics Recepter. This is an AC-powered clock/alarm radio that also receives AM fairly well, and has connectors for both AM and FM external antennas.


3. The receiving antenna is as important as the receiver itself, but is often neglected. An adequate (or even poor) receiver with a good antenna can often outperform a good receiver with a poor-to-adequate antenna. Getting “wire in the air” can make all the difference.


a. Telephone, cable TV, and power lines can act as antennas to bring noise into your home, but they may bring in lots of signal. Try putting your AM radio next to a wall outlet, near the phone or cable TV line, or next to or on top of an appliance like a microwave. You might be surprised by the results. Even FM broadcast reception may benefit.

b. In the AM broadcast band (and more so at 160-190 kHz), the radio wavelengths are extremely long. However, “long-wire” or “random-wire” antennas can perform acceptably to well even if the length is not significant compared to the wavelength of the received frequency. Using an antenna tuner or “preselector” (or both) can enhance the performance of a wire antenna.


c. A strange antenna that has worked in differing applications:


(1) Wrap several turns of a piece of insulated wire (#18-24) around the telescoping antenna of an FM or SW receiver or the internal or external ferrite rod antenna of an AM receiver.


(2) Attach an alligator clip or clamp onto the other end of the wire, then try attaching it to:


(a) A metal window frame or screen.


(b) A water pipe or heating water pipe (not a gas pipe).


(c) A metal or jacketed-wire clothesline.


(d) The finger hook of an old dial phone (if it’s connected to the phone line, that is).


(e) A metal bed frame (or any other metal frame).


(f) Whatever you can think of that is metal and in reach.


(3) Using an antenna tuner along with this may help.


d. In many cases, receiving enough signal is not so much the problem as not receiving noise and interference. A directional antenna is a commonly-used solution.


(1) Especially at frequencies at or below 2 MHz, a tuned vertical loop antenna can really help. A loop consists of multiple turns of wire around a frame (or around a ferrite rod). A tuned loop uses a variable capacitor with the loop (which is a coil) to tune the loop to pick up a particular frequency and reject others. The loop also picks up maximum signal in the plane of the loop and minimum signal when the loop is across the direction of the desired signal (“broadside”). If the direction of the desired signal is removed enough from the direction of a noise or interference source, the loop can be turned to receive maximum signal and minimum noise. Because of their construction, loops also tend to reduce static pickup. A loop that is designed to work with a matched (and tuned) RF amplifier is “active,” versus a “passive” loop. Active loops can achieve better performance but at greater expense than passive loops.


(2) Above 10-12 MHz, “half-wave” dipoles and “beams” become increasingly more useful.


(a) A “half-wave dipole” is simply two conductors (or “arms,” usually wires or tubes) lying along the same line from a common center, each arm being one-quarter of the wavelength of the desired reception frequency (or the center of a narrow band of frequencies). One wire of a two-conductor cable or “feedline” is connected to one arm at the center of the dipole, and the other conductor is connected to the other arm. The most common indoor FM antenna is a “folded dipole” (or “T”), which is a dipole in which each of the arms is folded back upon itself, but the folded parts are spaced away from each other and the free ends are NOT joined at the center. A dipole is slightly directional, with maximum pickup when placed across the direction to the desired source.


(b) A “beam” (or “Yagi beam”) builds upon the dipole by mounting it across a central shaft, and then placing slightly and progressively shorter “director” dipoles in front of it, and slightly and progressively longer “reflector” dipoles behind it. The directors and reflectors are not connected to any feedline; only the dipole that is the “driven element” is connected to the feedline. A beam concentrates signal pickup towards the directors (the front) and minimizes signal pickup from the sides and rear. The feedline should come away from a dipole or beam at a right angle. A number of TV beam antennas incorporate an FM beam section. A beam antenna is particularly useful in “multipath” situations where the signal from an FM broadcast station is being received over one or more paths which are interfering with each other. This usually involves the direct path and one or more signals reflected from hills or mountains or large structures. An FM beam can be pointed along the desired signal path and will then reject the other signals if the paths are sufficiently separated.


e. “Active” antennas (here not including active loops) consist of an indoor or outdoor antenna (usually a single element and called a “probe” if it is fairly short) and a tuned RF amplifier. They can produce good results in some situations but not so good in others. Active antennas usually cover 30 MHz down to 2-3 MHz, but there are some for FM and TV reception.


f. FM broadcast reception is almost always best with an unobstructed line-of-sight (LOS) path between the transmitting and receiving antennas. However, a large metal structure like a water tower that has LOS between itself and the transmitting and receiving antennas can reflect enough signal to provide a better path than a somewhat obstructed direct line.


g. One case study found that:


(1) The most effective FM broadcast receiving antenna was a beam mounted on a tower or mast, as high as possible. If mounted on a mast above a roof, the beam should be at least 4-6 feet above the roof.


(2) The most effective indoor FM antennas were:


(a) A beam mounted in the attic of a house or apartment building that is not made of reinforced concrete and does not have a metal framework, siding, or roof (effects of brick may vary depending on the metal or metal ore particle content of the clay). A small FM beam (3 or 4 elements) should fit in any such attic.


(b) The traditional FM folded dipole, subject to the same building constraints, although the most effective mounting will vary. Generally, keep it stretched out and up high, and in a window if your house isn’t wood.


h. Another directional antenna for FM broadcast use is the “Flying V” or “Flying Vee.” This antenna is a dipole in which the arms are bent towards the desired direction of reception until the angle between them is between 60 and 120 degrees. Because of interaction between the two arms, each is shortened by 3-5 percent. The directionality and signal pickup (which is also called “gain”) seem to increase with the element diameter (in other words, aluminum or copper tubing works better than thick wire, which works better than thin wire).


(1) A half-wave Flying Vee for 88 MHz with a 90 degree center angle and assuming 5% shorter arms will have an arm length of just under 30-5/16 inches, a “width” between the free ends of just over 42-27/32 inches, and a “depth” (from the center to the width line) of just under 21-7/16 inches.


(2) More gain can be obtained with a “5/4-wave” Flying Vee, which starts from a dipole that has a total length of 1.25 (5/4) times the wavelength of the desired frequency (each arm is 5/8 of the wavelength). A 5/4-wave Flying Vee for 88 MHz with a 90 degree center angle and assuming 5% shorter arms will have an arm length of 75-25/32 inches (just under 6-1/3 feet), a width of just over 107-5/32 inches (just under 9 feet), and a depth of just under 53-19/32 inches (just under 4.5 feet). This antenna could easily be attic-mounted, or even ceiling-mounted. A wire version could be floor-mounted under a carpet in a room above the room with the FM receiver, with the feedline “fished” down through the wall.


i. Some ready-made AM broadcast tunable passive loops are the Radio Shack 15-1853 (discontinued), the Terk Advantage AM-1000, and the Select-A-Tenna. The Radio Shack and Terk units and the “M” model of the Select-A-Tenna have short connecting cords to connect to the external antenna terminals of an AM receiver that has them. They can also “inductively couple” to the internal ferrite rod antenna of a portable AM receiver if the receiver and loop are placed close together (and usually at right angles to each other). Please note that the Select-A-Tenna has been produced for over 30 years, so there are older versions (made sometime before 1991) that will only tune up to 1600 kHz. The Select-A-Tenna is also the largest of these three loops (about a foot in diameter) and all are for indoor use (subject to the limits for using an FM beam or dipole indoors). You can put one of these loops on a plastic “Lazy Susan” turntable to position it more easily. If you are using a small AM receiver inductively coupled to the loop, you may be able to find a Lazy Susan large enough for both, so the receiver is always positioned for maximum pickup from the loop.


j. One of the newer AM broadcast active loops is the C. Crane Company “Twin Coil Ferrite.” This is a recently patented design, which may help to keep its price up for a number of years yet, but the antenna has received some good reviews. The “loop” part can be mounted outside a building, connected with a cable to the amplifier inside.


Hopefully this article has given you some ideas on how to improve your radio reception. Don’t be afraid to experiment – you might be pleasantly surprised by the results.

Filed Under: Uncategorized

WCRV Labor Day Weekend UPDATE

September 3, 2004 by scwis Leave a Comment

Hi Friends,
I have a few things to report, some of which may be interesting to certain ones of you…

Hi Friends,
I have a few things to report, some of which may be interesting to certain ones of you…

1. Once again, I have moved the antenna, again to the original position. This area affords WCRV a better signal. Interestingly, it is MUCH taller than it was, and the signal continues to improve.
I must once again install the ground system, which again will improve the signal way above what it was….this will not take a long time to accomplish.
In fact, I’m looking at a big Labor Day push off for WCRV!

I need to make this point clear; the current signal is as good as WCRV has ever been. The reinstallation of the new ground system will
improve the signal of WCRV. Whats more, there is a possibility of raising the antenna another 10 feet.
I tested our signal on 1510, despite the underlying signals, and the WCRV signal is now on top of the 50,000 watters coming into the area! While there is still a possibility of returning to 1540, there is no
need for programmers to be alarmed about this while producing shows: The ID’s are now running as 1510 and 1540, simply because the tuning
has been a terror.

Whatever you are saying on air, be it 1510 or 1540 is fine. I appolgize but I haven’t been able to settle on a particular freqency just yet. As fall and winter approach, evening programming will revert to earlier times, so as to be heard locally and not be drowned out by distant stations. This info will be updated on the website (below)…thank you to webmaster Joyce. The jingles are available like I said, if you choose to use them.

2. Programming: WCRV continues to attract top-notch programming. As you know, we now have Album Zone on the air, LTOBS, comedy is coming,
and Charles Blandings’ formats; a standards format, and a 50’s format, are both coming to WCRV. Vic Fusco’s jazz format will also be on WCRV soon. I am also emailing Ken Lamb, who was the boss at WPAT, wondering if he can help WCRV with beautiful music programming. I am sure this would be a big plus for WCRV. The talk about beautiful music programming continues on the web, and there is no doubt in my mind that it can be an asset to WCRV. Ken knows this inside-out, so I am hoping he can contribute to WCRV.

3. Programming continued: The most exciting thing happening at WCRV right now is two-part: the
possibility of being automated, which means wcrv will be on air when we are at work, and the change of overall format; a bigband/standards format which is being provided by our engineer, Charles Blanding. Being a low powered station, WCRV will need to be a station that caters to all kinds of listeners. I’d love it to be a 70’s format, but we
actually have several stations in the area doing exactly that. What we don’t have is a station that programs big bands, standards, traditional
and soft jazz, and that is the way WCRV is going to be going. Yes, we will still require talk, progressive rock, and most of the format I currently have on the air.

To cater to the people who will potentially listen to WCRV, I need to bend the format that way. I am seeking and continue to seek standards/traditional programming for WCRV. Charles has also provided information for automating WCRV, which will not only help in rotating music, but will help when I can not be at the controls. I also pointed out that as fall approaches, WCRV’s signal will be impaired by the 50k’s, so to be heard, I want the best programming on the air at the best times. This means moving Saturday night Dance Party up a couple hours, otherwise it may not be heard.

Getting the automation on will be difficult because I am not a computer whiz. Editor’s Note: Perhaps Carl or Joyce could stop by the Forums and ask a few questions? Joyce will be spearheading this part of the project, but we are not experts at computer programming. Thanks to the engineers, I have a good idea on how to connect the studio to the computer. However, lately I’ve been lucky, as the antenna is more efficient, and the signal is as good as it ever has been and it is becoming consistant.

Just one more thing: the sound of WCRV is excellent: it is a blend of highs and lows and although it is not stereo, WCRV sounds excellent….I’m very proud of the sound of the station. The signal at this point is good too; again we are covering the entire town, and then some, and like I said the ground system is not yet in. In the future, should finances let themselves be, WCRV could put on a FM; again, this is a big IF, only because of the need to hide an antenna. FM part 15 is difficult because it does not lend itself to a wide signal; I could put on a wide signal easily, but it is difficult to hide.

Putting on a FM would be a lot easier to do than putting on the AM, but the AM lends itself to a much wider and stronger signal, and I believe the population will listen to it, should we program it the right way. Charles’ ideas about putting standards on the station is the right direction at this point. The specialty shows will stay, definitely.
But the basic format will change from 70’s based to a standards/bigbands/jazz format with help from Charles and Vic.

That is the report for now; if anything changes, I will let you know. Thank You for Emailing WCRV. We welcome your requests and dedications.
Please support WCRV as your own community radio station by listening and sponsoring us.

Thank you!
Carl and Joyce Van Orden
WCRV Cherry Ridge Radio
CHECK OUT OUR WEBSITE!
http://wcrv1540am.tripod.com/wcrv.html

Filed Under: Uncategorized

WCRV antenna adventures

August 23, 2004 by scwis Leave a Comment

I’ll try a story about my antenna.

I may have to tell about the antenna in a couple of installments…

I’ll try a story about my antenna.

I may have to tell about the antenna in a couple of installments…

I’ll also say from the get go that I may say something that may not pertain to part 15 proper, but the story is about the antenna, not the operation of my radio station.

Before starting the part 15, my group tested a couple well known transmitters. I don’t have to name them, you know them. This group consists of actual AM engineers, so besides my opinion, their opinion counted.

The popular transmitters were only good with a good antenna. Both tx’s recommended a CB-type whip antenna. And, if you like 500 feet of pure signal, they are just fine.

I ended up purchasing a sstran transmitter kit, which one of our engineers built for me. It came with the traditional 3 foot wire antenna, and to tell the truth, the transmitter put out exactly the same signal that the popular, expensive ones put out with a CB whip. I knew a CB whip isn’t tuned to the AM band, and it certainly isn’t tunable.

Phil Boylan, who owns sstran tx company was very helpful with my setup. But I had a ton of questions, and one of them led to Phil doing two things; redesigning the tx so that it could accept a coil/base loaded antenna, and designing such an antenna. We wanted this to remain part 15 acceptable.

I use an antenna very very similar to what Phil designed. It consists of a coil, which is magnetic wire which includes taps, wound around a piece of pvc pipe. The antenna itself is copper pipe, which sits upon pvc, which acts as an insulator.

Basically, your antenna wire runs to a selected tap on this coil, the top of the coil attaches to the copper pipe. The copper pipe antenna is adjustable, built with about one foot of 3/4″ pipe, and inside sits about 9 feet of 1/2″ pipe (these lengths are estimates, actual footage to remain legal is on the sstran.com site.

And that is key; in order to make the antenna “resonant” to your frequency, you can raise up, or lower your antenna, more accurately than cutting a piece of wire, more or less rendering you off the air.

My first incarnation of this antenna was built inside during the winter. I live in a metal mobile home, and I set it against the house to test it. I got nowhere, but the reason was I was up against a metal house.

When spring came, I purchased a 10 foot iron pipe, 4 inches across, and also purchased various pieces of pvc to attach to it in order for it to accept the (about) 2″ pvc adapter which holds the copper antenna pipe.

This put together, I dug a good hole in the ground and cemented the iron pipe into the ground. With the iron pipe, my antenna stood about 25 feet high at the tip, and I placed it about 12 feet from the house.

The biggest trick to this installation is making sure the iron pipe is really cemented into the ground, and that you have a ladder whereby you can reach the point where 3/4″ and 1/2″ pipe come together. That is where you tune the antenna.

I also should mention that the coil needs to be as close to this copper pipe junction as possible. In my case, I actually ran the coil and tx from the ground, encased in a large Rubbermaid tote, because at the time I had no way to mount it way up there. (See?…I learned from my mistake; I couldn’t climb up that pole!)

I’ve been in AM radio, and I know that radials are helpful. In my case, my backyard has a tendency to remain damp and in most cases, wet. A wet ground is excellent for AM radio broadcasting, so this area was perfect.

With 100mW broadcasting, radials can help your signal. In standard AM broadcasting, there are 360 radials per tower, which could run into quite a bit of copper, and then quite a bit of money. In our case, just several, to notice the difference is required, and that may be just 10 radials.

I bought copper strand wire, and a hose clamp. The clamp went around the base of the iron support pipe. You want to make sure you can see the iron, and not any paint, so you may have to sand it.

I laid the copper wire radials out in equal lengths, about 10 feet each, and separated equally, like a clock. I buried them a couple inches into the ground and then soldered them to the iron pipe, tightening it all down with that pipe clamp.

After some tuning, (that is another story) I found phenomenal results.

Well, here is the story; I didn’t have a Field Strength meter, so the best I could do was to tune off frequency, try to tune the antenna, STEP BACK, and listen.

The louder I got off frequency, the better I was, and I did this til I got a signal that covered the entire high band. I was on 1540 khz, with 1590 down the road, and I killed 1590 for a mile. So I knew I had it right.

Now comes the sad news; My trailer park “outlawed” antennas. So, it had to come down if I was to stay living here, and down it came. I thought of everything…using wires around the house, up the house, etc, etc, and I did try some of these things knowing they would not work.

And they didn’t.

So, I had to build this antenna all over again, and DISGUISE it.

In short, I decided to build a pvc pipe flagpole over it, and even now, Ol’ Glory hangs beside my house on what contains my copper AM radio antenna.

Does it work?

Yes it does, although at this time I’m having some problems related to a couple ground shorts; tonight I may have solved the problem, but the point is that the pvc does not kill your signal if you have to hide an antenna.

I had to make the flagpole look like a flagpole and not an antenna, and I had to hide the transmitter and coil, so I built a box around it. You should see me working inside that box, and no one really knows what I’m up to. Ultimately it will be a planter when everything is soldered up right.

It is a good idea for someone in a position like mine, where you want your station on the air, but you are not allowed to have an antenna.

This is a great hobby for me, and when I achieve this goal, which I will, I’ll probably move onto something else. And that something else is a SECRET!! 🙂 Well, for now anyway. Share your antenna ideas with us!

The cost of building the antenna: The magnetic wire cost the most, about $25 bucks but I had enough to
build two coils and had extra, and btw, it was a good thing I bought extra; I ruined the first coil.
The parts for the antenna cost about 30 bucks, but I needed everything and you may have some pvc or copper laying around.

Once built, you can move it, adjust it, move it again. Be careful, the smallest pvc part is very fragile, just like an insulator,otherwise, it is easy to build and is kind of a fun project.

Filed Under: Uncategorized

My part 15 station – UPDATED with links 8/24

August 23, 2004 by scwis Leave a Comment

Another happy Part 15 Broadcaster! Be sure to share your stories – happy or sad – with Part15.us!
Our latest contributor writes:

After reading as much as possible about part 15 radio, I took the plunge…

Another happy Part 15 Broadcaster! Be sure to share your stories – happy or sad – with Part15.us!
Our latest contributor writes:

After reading as much as possible about part 15 radio, I took the plunge…

I purchased a Gizmo FCC compliant 100mw AM transmitter and went on the air. I get good range (1.75-2 miles radius easy despite lots of trees and a low height above average terrain), I am legal, and having lots of fun.

Despite articles describing the importance of height, I put my antenna in the attic along with the transmitter as I felt that I could make any needed adjustements there, and this has proven to be a good decision.

I was going to get a copper pipe to make an antenna, when I noticed my old uhf yagi antenna in the corner of the attic, so I just turned it to a vertical position, and let that be my (5′ more or less) antenna.

Then I bought a round trash bucket at wal mart, wound a few hundred feet of wire around it to make a loading coil, used a few twists for tuning taps, and attached it to my upright yagi. I based this loosely on some articles I had read.

Then reading more about grounding, I found an article about elevated radials (from 1938!), so I strung about 8- 50′ elevated copper wires as elevated ground radials ( in the attic of course), used a TWO FOOT LEAD, and let that be my ground.

To check my radiated power, I applied an amperage rated LED to the coil, and later a multimeter to check current, and then used ohm’s law to calculate approximate radiated power: It seemed compliant, at no more than 100mw… Editor’s note – The regs actually specify 100mw power into the final stage, but this app looks good!

Considerations: you need to fiddle with the antenna and ground to get distance. Just a slight difference in connections (use the tuning taps), will make all the difference.

The level of sound into the transmitter makes a difference in range– despite reports advising otherwise, I find running my computer driven audio feed into the transmitter on the high side of volume gives more range even if it leads to a little over compression w/in 150 feet of the transmitter. Editor’s note – YES – modulation intensity is a big factor in AM broadcasting.

And you must have a sensitive radio on the receiving end (good car radio w/ antenna). Lots of fun-not lots of $$$

That 1938 story I referenced regarding elevated ground radials was really from 1937 article imbedded in an article at www.commtechrf.com/ambroadcast.htm.

By the way, I neglected to mention my capacitance hat, made out of a paper plate wrapped in aluminum foil and then mashed between my vertical uhf tv antenna turned part 15 am antenna, and the roof.

Filed Under: Uncategorized

Receiving Part 15 Transmitters

August 9, 2004 by scwis Leave a Comment

Here’s a great article on tuning in our little peanut whistles – consider sharing this with your potential listeners!

Receiving Part 15 Transmitters

Glenn A. Elliott, 08 August 2004

Successful radio reception depends on factors at both the transmitter and at the receiver.

Here’s a great article on tuning in our little peanut whistles – consider sharing this with your potential listeners!

Receiving Part 15 Transmitters

Glenn A. Elliott, 08 August 2004

Successful radio reception depends on factors at both the transmitter and at the receiver.

Filed Under: Uncategorized

A summary of part 15 rules for all bands

August 3, 2004 by scwis Leave a Comment

There’s been some discussion in the Forums lately about broadcasting on alternate bands. Member tregonsee has graciously provided a general discussion of all of the pertinent FCC regulations in his “Digest of Part 15.” Please click below to read more, and be sure to visit the Forums and discuss your impressions!

There’s been some discussion in the Forums lately about broadcasting on alternate bands. Member tregonsee has graciously provided a general discussion of all of the pertinent FCC regulations in his “Digest of Part 15.” Please click below to read more, and be sure to visit the Forums and discuss your impressions!

Digest of Part 15, FCC Regulations (in effect as of June 2004) Applying to Low-Power Over-the-Air Transmitters

NOTE: This is an unofficial document. While major efforts have been made to insure that it accurately reflects Part 15, no warranty of accuracy is made. This is also a digest of Part 15 and thus not complete, and only reflects two out of six subparts.

01. Part 15 applies to:

a. Intentional radiators (low-power transmitters intended to transmit a modulated radio signal “through the air”), AND

b. Unintentional radiators (devices designed to generate radio frequency energy but not transmit it through the air, including radio receivers and “digital devices” such as computers and peripherals), AND

c. Incidental radiators (devices not designed to generate radio signals but that do so as a by-product of their operation, such as motors and light dimmers and switches).

02. Interference and Use of Part 15 Devices

a. Part 15 devices must not cause harmful interference (that disrupts licensed radio services), even if the devices conform to the Part 15 technical standards.

b. Users of Part 15 devices must accept any interference caused by licensed radio services.

c. Any user of any Part 15 device must stop operating the device if notified by the FCC that the device is causing harmful interference, and may not use the device until the interference problem is corrected.

d. Users of Part 15 devices are not protected against each other’s interference.

e. Users of Part 15 devices do not have and can not obtain any right to use any device, frequency, or emission type.

03. Except for authorized law enforcement operations, Part 15 devices may not be used to listen to or record private conversations without the consent of all parties concerned.

04. Part 15 devices must be constructed per good design and manufacturing practices to not emit any signal that is not in accordance with FCC Regulations.

a. Part 15 devices must suppress extraneous signals as much as practicable. In general:

(1) No extraneous signal can be stronger than the desired or intended signal.

(2) Extraneous signals must usually be at least 20 dB below the level of the desired signal.

(3) All signals less than 20 dB below the level of the desired signal must be contained within an authorized band, or a bandwidth within that band.

b. No user-accessible controls can allow the device to operate in violation of the FCC Regulations.

c. No radiator should emit any stronger signal than what is needed for reliable operation.

d. A commercially-made Part 15 transmitter that comes with an antenna permanently fixed to the transmitter enclosure may not be used with another antenna except a substantially identical replacement.

e. NOTE: If antenna length is limited, Part 15 does not mention how it is measured (except 49.82-49.90 MHz, only single-element antenna under alternate standards). This is a special concern for the 160-190 kHz and 510-1705 kHz bands, where a “capacity hat” or “top hat” is often used at the top of the antenna. However, in several inquiries, the FCC has not objected to measuring antenna length from the base of the antenna to the end of one of the “hat” radials (the longest if all are not equal). The rim of the “hat” is not considered, nor are loading coils.

05. This notice must be affixed to the enclosure of a Part 15 device that is home-built or is not allowed to carry a different notice or identifier:

Filed Under: Uncategorized

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 25
  • Page 26
  • Page 27
  • Page 28
  • Page 29
  • Go to Next Page »

Primary Sidebar

Online Members

 No online members at the moment

Recent Posts

  • RichPowers

    Ultra long range Part 15 broadcasting (to space)

    While car makers appear to be opting for the licenced s...

    By RichPowers , 2 days ago

  • Mark

    Here's a look at why we do processing and what each function does.

    Shows for FM but applies to AM also.

    By Mark , 6 days ago

  • Mark

    RE: Early 80s Realty Radio' AM transmitters

    I don't think the audio quality would be that good on t...

    By Mark , 2 weeks ago

  • RichPowers

    RE: Early 80s Realty Radio' AM transmitters

    I was very tempted to buy them both, they were dirt che...

    By RichPowers , 2 weeks ago

  • RichPowers

    RE: Part 15 Too Restrictive for Automakers

    @mark I had to pause when you mentioned "15 minute citi...

    By RichPowers , 2 weeks ago

Recent Topics

  • Mark

    Here's a look at why we do processing and what each function does.

    By Mark 6 days ago

  • RichPowers

    Part 15 Too Restrictive for Automakers

    By RichPowers 2 weeks ago

  • RichPowers

    From Virtue to Vice - Music Morality

    By RichPowers 3 weeks ago

  • RichPowers

    affordable DAC Impressive Versatility “audiophile quality” Promising Big performance at small price

    By RichPowers 3 weeks ago

  • RichPowers

    New Canadian Resident?

    By RichPowers 3 weeks ago

Topic Tags

  • Carl Blare3
  • KDX RADIO3
  • WINDOZE3
  • Transmitter2
  • Radio Phvern2
  • station upgrade2
  • archive.org2
  • playlist2
  • Zara Radio2
  • Carrier Current1
View all tags (74)

Copyright © 2026 · Part15.org · Log in