• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Part15

Part15

License Free, legal, low-power radio broadcasting

  • About Us
  • Forums
  • Resources
  • Members
  • Contact Us
  • Log In

Troubleshooting AMT3000

June 4, 2012 by Carl Blare

We are happy owners of two AMT3000 transmitters, and decided to make the modification described for using an external loading coil and pipe antenna, which includes changing C23 from 820p to 561p. This was done to both transmitters but then one of them worked and the other did not.

Putting the ailing transmitter on the bench was made extra convenient by use of the PhilB “Dummy Load”, a 30-ohm resistor/30pf capacitor in place of the antenna. A working transmitter can be received on a radio within a 2.5 foot radius.

It was quickly found that the audio path was absolutely fine.

Next, the two DC supplies were checked, 5V & 15V. Mighty fine.

The problem was in the RF section.

We found that ICs U3 and U7 were not generating the selected frequency, which should have been 1550kHz. We thought maybe an IC was blown.

Having a second transmitter made the next step easy, we swapped chips, and soon discovered that all of the ICs were in good condition.

At intervals we would repeat a visual inspection looking for solder points, but of course the transmitter had been good for several years, so solder didn’t seem like a likely problem.

This evening we returned to the bench and turned the AMT3000 on for further examination, and it worked perfectly. An hour has passed and it’s working fine. But do you see the problem? We have no clue why it didn’t work for several weeks, and now it’s running fine. It holds up to being shook and prodded with toothpicks (looking for loose contacts).

Now the question for you to answer… how can this situation be explained?

Filed Under: Uncategorized

About Carl Blare

Ambassador of Recreational Radio, owner operator of KDX Worldround Radio, webmaster for kdxradio.com, host of The Blare Blog.

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. radio8z says

    June 4, 2012 at 8:14 am

    Mystery Fix
    Carl,

    I presume the ICs are in sockets. I have seen many instances of failure due to poor connection between the IC pins and sockets to the point where I never use them for analog circuits. It could be that when you removed and replaced the ICs the wiping action on the pins cleaned them establishing contact.

    Reasons for this type of problem with sockets vary but poor pin to socket contact can be caused by oxidation, lack of tension, and contaminants such as solder flux finding its way into the socket.

    Of course, the old nemesis of kit builders can be at work namely a bad solder joint which is intermittent. If the problem returns you can try resoldering all connections. This seems like a lot of work but it usually saves time over trying to find a bad joint(s) by troubleshooting.

    Neil

    • Carl Blare says

      June 4, 2012 at 11:48 am

      Worth Knowing
      That is good information, radio8Z. The metal to metal contact of ICs and their sockets has everything against it, now that we’re focusing on it…

      A lot of pins, very small contact area per pin, common metal not gold plated, and, as always, the world of contamination.

      I cannot imagine a device or tool of the right size to clean down in IC sockets…. is their something that will work?

      • wdcx says

        June 4, 2012 at 3:08 pm

        IC’s mysteriously “move” over
        IC’s mysteriously “move” over time. I have routinely pressed on IC’s in sockets the feel them go in a bit farther. I agree with the other post that may have simply been the problem.

        • Carl Blare says

          June 4, 2012 at 5:57 pm

          Mystery For Sure
          That really is a mystery, ICs that move over time.

          I remember countless routine “pressing” on ICs in their sockets to get that extra insertion. This has been true of computer boards as well as all other electronic equipment.

          Are they attracted to the moon?

          • andre_pro20g says

            June 4, 2012 at 8:53 pm

            Yep, my money is on the IC
            Yep, my money is on the IC sockets too. As convenient as they are, they have small drawbacks.

            I remember back in the day when a 2MB computer board had lots and lots of socketed ICs. We had to reseat them every few weeks due to temperature cycles and fan vibrations.

          • mram1500 says

            June 5, 2012 at 2:40 am

            SCRITCH…
            I like that “scrunchy” sound they make when you press on them as they seat into the socket.

          • Carl Blare says

            June 5, 2012 at 3:06 am

            Scritch the Itch
            That is sure true. You press the IC that extra nano-scritch into its socket and there is a feeling that everything will be fine now.

            If anything fails after that point life isn’t worth living.

          • RFB says

            June 6, 2012 at 12:21 am

            H2S
            If you live anywhere near any kind of oil field or pump jacks or any industrial place (if there are any left in this country) that use chemicals, those chemicals and H2S oil field gasses wreak havoc on silver and copper. It leaves a very dark and nasty coating which dampens contact surfaces such as IC leads and their sockets.

            Was not uncommon to have to pull chips and reseat them and have to resilver plate all the cavities in transmitters out in the field down in Tx. Almost every 4 to 6 months that corrosion has to be checked for and removed.

            Or it could just be someone has not done some dusting around the house in awhile! :p

            RFB

Primary Sidebar

Online Members

 No online members at the moment

Recent Posts

  • RichPowers

    Ultra long range Part 15 broadcasting (to space)

    While car makers appear to be opting for the licenced s...

    By RichPowers , 2 days ago

  • Mark

    Here's a look at why we do processing and what each function does.

    Shows for FM but applies to AM also.

    By Mark , 5 days ago

  • Mark

    RE: Early 80s Realty Radio' AM transmitters

    I don't think the audio quality would be that good on t...

    By Mark , 2 weeks ago

  • RichPowers

    RE: Early 80s Realty Radio' AM transmitters

    I was very tempted to buy them both, they were dirt che...

    By RichPowers , 2 weeks ago

  • RichPowers

    RE: Part 15 Too Restrictive for Automakers

    @mark I had to pause when you mentioned "15 minute citi...

    By RichPowers , 2 weeks ago

Recent Topics

  • Mark

    Here's a look at why we do processing and what each function does.

    By Mark 5 days ago

  • RichPowers

    Part 15 Too Restrictive for Automakers

    By RichPowers 2 weeks ago

  • RichPowers

    From Virtue to Vice - Music Morality

    By RichPowers 3 weeks ago

  • RichPowers

    affordable DAC Impressive Versatility “audiophile quality” Promising Big performance at small price

    By RichPowers 3 weeks ago

  • RichPowers

    New Canadian Resident?

    By RichPowers 3 weeks ago

Topic Tags

  • Carl Blare3
  • KDX RADIO3
  • WINDOZE3
  • Transmitter2
  • Radio Phvern2
  • station upgrade2
  • archive.org2
  • playlist2
  • Zara Radio2
  • #SW2101
View all tags (75)

Copyright © 2026 · Part15.org · Log in