I think we may be losing the forest for the trees. What makes Part 15 broadcasting unique? Playing the Top 40 hits along with all the other thousand...

A few comments on the previous posts. I have no issue with built-in audio processing in a transmitter, as long as it doesn't add significant cost. I...

I'm going to take a slightly different perspective here. Most of these types of discussions end up focusing on those factors maximizing range. Unfor...

Let’s not make this another long ground lead discussion. We’re wandering far off the intent of the original post.

There's nothing to apologize for, AMRadioLegend. We all appreciate updates on this highly anticipated device. Rich, the issue of the legality of the...

Rich, the Talking House plus coax and ATU as an entire configuration was certified under Part 15.219 by the FCC. That means that it complies with tho...

Amateur radio communication at the mw level is almost always narrow band type modes, such as CW. Beacons are essentially a narrow, CW pulse. It's ve...

Small towns are disappearing as well, so it's not surprising that their radio stations are going. I don't like it, and don't agree with it, but it ju...

It wouldn’t be certified if it overrode the FCC rule.

There have been a few people in the past who have used the ISM frequency at 13.56 and have posted about it. If I recall correctly, range was similar ...

Part 15.219 doesn't limit field strength. The Talking House transmitter, combined with the ATU (and coax) has been FCC certified, and so if you use i...

The ability to broadcast over the air is a privilege, not a right. In return for that privilege, the FCC already does set forward a list of rules tha...