• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Part15

Part15

License Free, legal, low-power radio broadcasting

  • About Us
  • Forums
  • Resources
  • Members
  • Contact Us
  • Log In

Part15 Layout Fluctuation

February 24, 2013 by jpjanze 13 Comments

Just a quick note to let everyone know that they aren’t ‘crazy’ if it seems like where things are keeps changing! I am moving things around periodically right now – the layout is still in flux for hte new site – it will settle soon, but we aren’t done yet.

The changes are trying to find the ‘right’ place to add things back in that were here before, without cluttering things up again – trying to balance keeping things clean with functional.

Let me know if there is something you are missing and I will make it a priority to get it ‘back’

(ALSO – organizing some old posts so they are appearing as ‘recent’ sorry about that – doesn’t seem to be anyway around it unfortunately)

Cheers!

Jon Paul

Filed Under: Uncategorized

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. PhilB says

    March 15, 2013 at 5:54 am

    Reference to message number in reply
    I noticed a while ago that the top line in each reply had a “Reply to massage #”. This seems to have disappeared lately. I really liked that feature because it added clarity regarding the post that a reply is directed towards, especially when there are numerous intervening posts in a thread.

    I cast a strong vote for bringing it back!

    Reply
  2. jpjanze says

    March 18, 2013 at 4:39 am

    It’s baaack! (I think 🙂

    Hi Phil, i think that feature is back (or still here?) – have a look again and see if you see it or not. it should appear next to the date stamp in the reply (a reply that is in response to the original post does not have a ‘reply to’; only a reply to a reply has it. If it doesn’t appear for you, something is wrong 🙂

     

    Cheers!

    Jon Paul

    Reply
  3. PhilB says

    March 18, 2013 at 5:03 am

    Still a bit confused
    Looking back in some of the earlier longer threads, I see the reply reference here and there. Some threads have it in almost every reply and some don’t have it at all. Maybe the absence is due to every reply being posted in reply the the first message, but that doesn’t seem likely in a long thread.

    Can you change the “reply to message #” to be included for replies to the original post?

    Reply
  4. PhilB says

    March 18, 2013 at 5:07 am

    Example
    I just looked at my previous reply here, message #4. It doesn’t show the reference even though I hit “reply” under your last message, #3.

    Reply
  5. PhilB says

    March 18, 2013 at 6:53 am

    I think I found the problem
    I think the problem, as I see it is that when you click the Reply button immediately under a post, the reply is actually interpreted as a reply to the original post, not the specific one you intend to reply to.

    Reply
    • admin says

      March 18, 2013 at 7:48 pm

      mystery solved

      Hi Phil, good work on the sleuthing! I totally forgot we implemented a ‘flat comments’ process as we weren’t using threaded comments (or at least weren’t displaying them as threaded). I see now that it is much nicer to have the ‘reply to comment x’ so have turned off ‘flat comments’ – this should make things work going forwards.

      Cheers!

       

      Reply
      • PhilB says

        March 18, 2013 at 8:52 pm

        Thanks Jon Paul!
        Thanks Jon Paul!

        Reply
  6. Johny C says

    March 24, 2013 at 5:48 am

    Its like coming home to a new

    Its like coming home to a new house

    Reply
    • Carl Blare says

      March 24, 2013 at 5:58 am

      Has That Happened?

      Johny C., does that ever happen?

      Has anyone ever come home to a new house?

      But you know, it IS like that here at “The New Part15.us”.

      Nice place you’ve got here.

      Reply
      • PhilB says

        May 31, 2013 at 8:44 am

        Suggestion for new home Page Menu Option

        Hi Jon-Paul,

        Every time I go to this site, I click on a saved favorites entry for http://www.part15.us/recent-posts

        That’s the most logical and least confusing way to get to the ordered list of recent posts.

        The problem is, that link is not visible on the home page if you are not logged in and even when you are logged in, it isn’t easily spottable on the home page over on the right under Navigation. I am suggesting that you move that link to a much more prominant place on your home page and make it visible regardless of log-in status. If the link is up front and quickly seen, It will instantly lead frequent and new forum viewers to the latest posts. That may very well increase forum participation.

        Reply
        • PhilB says

          May 31, 2013 at 8:42 am

          More Home Page Suggestions

          I was just looking at the differences between the home page display when I am not logged in vs. being logged out.

          I don’t think the two pages should be so substantially different. This is a forum website. The full contents should be logically organized the same way whether a user is logged in or not. The process of logging in should only relate to enabling replies to messages, and maybe being able to see who else  is currently logged in.

          I think you should merge the home pages in such a way that it shows everything (with the possible exception of who’s logged in) whether a user is logged in or not, and focus on getting the reader to the date-ordered, most recent posts as easily as possible.

          I’ve always had an uneasy feeling the Part15.us is “somehow different” and harder to navigate than all the other mainstream forums. I hope my suggestions may help. The goal is simple, inuitive navigation. That can only help increase participation. The goal is “Wow! This is easy”.

           

           

          Reply
          • admin says

            June 3, 2013 at 3:02 pm

            thanks for the feedback!

            Hi Phil, sorry for the delayed response – all feedback is appreciated and noted. More changes to come 🙂

            Cheers!

            Jon Paul

  7. MICRO1700 says

    June 3, 2013 at 9:54 pm

    Thank you
    Thanks for what you do
    Jon-Paul!

    Bruce, The DOGRADIO Group

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Primary Sidebar

Online Members

 No online members at the moment

Recent Posts

  • RichPowers

    Ultra long range Part 15 broadcasting (to space)

    While car makers appear to be opting for the licenced s...

    By RichPowers , 2 days ago

  • Mark

    Here's a look at why we do processing and what each function does.

    Shows for FM but applies to AM also.

    By Mark , 6 days ago

  • Mark

    RE: Early 80s Realty Radio' AM transmitters

    I don't think the audio quality would be that good on t...

    By Mark , 2 weeks ago

  • RichPowers

    RE: Early 80s Realty Radio' AM transmitters

    I was very tempted to buy them both, they were dirt che...

    By RichPowers , 2 weeks ago

  • RichPowers

    RE: Part 15 Too Restrictive for Automakers

    @mark I had to pause when you mentioned "15 minute citi...

    By RichPowers , 2 weeks ago

Recent Topics

  • Mark

    Here's a look at why we do processing and what each function does.

    By Mark 6 days ago

  • RichPowers

    Part 15 Too Restrictive for Automakers

    By RichPowers 2 weeks ago

  • RichPowers

    From Virtue to Vice - Music Morality

    By RichPowers 3 weeks ago

  • RichPowers

    affordable DAC Impressive Versatility “audiophile quality” Promising Big performance at small price

    By RichPowers 3 weeks ago

  • RichPowers

    New Canadian Resident?

    By RichPowers 3 weeks ago

Topic Tags

  • Carl Blare3
  • KDX RADIO3
  • WINDOZE3
  • Transmitter2
  • Radio Phvern2
  • station upgrade2
  • archive.org2
  • playlist2
  • Zara Radio2
  • #SW2101
View all tags (75)

Copyright © 2026 · Part15.org · Log in