• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Part15

Part15

License Free, legal, low-power radio broadcasting

  • About Us
  • Forums
  • Resources
  • Members
  • Contact Us
  • Log In

More thoughts on transmitter & antenna design

October 9, 2005 by scwis Leave a Comment

Here are some spec’s to keep in mind when designing kits and type accepted transmitters…

Here are some spec’s to keep in mind when designing kits and type accepted transmitters…

1) Transmitter should employ a PWM Modulator and a Class “E” Final.

2) Modulator Deck and RF Deck should be seperate from each other.

3) The RF Deck should employ a PLL using a TCXO reference.

4) The output tuning network should employ a High Voltage / High
Impedance output like the Rangemaster and have a bypass circuit for users who
would like to use a base loaded vertical such as Carl Van Orden”s or
the Magnum. I”d like to see more EH antenna designs and documentation
and notes make it into the library as well as some transmitter designs
based around these parameters laid out here.

5) The Design should offer the option of either unbalanced RCA Line
level inputs or a +4db balanced 600 ohm input to match pro broadcast
equipment.

6) The transmitter should not have extra built-in limiters or at a
minimum the ability to bypass built-in limiting when using outboard
limiting.

7) Transmitter should be capable of -99%/+150% modulation for that big
station sound.

8) RF/Modulator decks should use metal boxes for sheilding.

9) RF Deck should feature a tuning meter to aid in tuning antenna and
setting power output.

10) The final should be 100mw DC input in unmodulated state with the
ability to be Adjusted to 1watt.

11) Please publish complete manual in PDF complete with schematics.
Manual should be well written like the SSTRAN manual.

12) Transmitter should be marketed and sold as a kit only to cut down
on costs and would idealy cost in the $200.00 range. Maybe a Type
Accepted Fully Assembled Version as well

I think these ideas should offer a good starting point to a quality
transmitter design for somebody thinking about designing a new kit or type
accepted transmitter.

Written By
Rev. Robert P. Chrysafis

Filed Under: Uncategorized

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Primary Sidebar

Online Members

 No online members at the moment

Recent Posts

  • RichPowers

    Ultra long range Part 15 broadcasting (to space)

    While car makers appear to be opting for the licenced s...

    By RichPowers , 1 day ago

  • Mark

    Here's a look at why we do processing and what each function does.

    Shows for FM but applies to AM also.

    By Mark , 5 days ago

  • Mark

    RE: Early 80s Realty Radio' AM transmitters

    I don't think the audio quality would be that good on t...

    By Mark , 2 weeks ago

  • RichPowers

    RE: Early 80s Realty Radio' AM transmitters

    I was very tempted to buy them both, they were dirt che...

    By RichPowers , 2 weeks ago

  • RichPowers

    RE: Part 15 Too Restrictive for Automakers

    @mark I had to pause when you mentioned "15 minute citi...

    By RichPowers , 2 weeks ago

Recent Topics

  • Mark

    Here's a look at why we do processing and what each function does.

    By Mark 5 days ago

  • RichPowers

    Part 15 Too Restrictive for Automakers

    By RichPowers 2 weeks ago

  • RichPowers

    From Virtue to Vice - Music Morality

    By RichPowers 3 weeks ago

  • RichPowers

    affordable DAC Impressive Versatility “audiophile quality” Promising Big performance at small price

    By RichPowers 3 weeks ago

  • RichPowers

    New Canadian Resident?

    By RichPowers 3 weeks ago

Topic Tags

  • Carl Blare3
  • KDX RADIO3
  • WINDOZE3
  • Transmitter2
  • Radio Phvern2
  • station upgrade2
  • archive.org2
  • playlist2
  • Zara Radio2
  • #SW2101
View all tags (75)

Copyright © 2026 · Part15.org · Log in