• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Part15

Part15

License Free, legal, low-power radio broadcasting

  • About Us
  • Forums
  • Resources
  • Members
  • Contact Us
  • Log In

Modulation Transformers

July 14, 2011 by Carl Blare

Most of the AM medium wave transmitters for Part 15 low power do not use transformer modulation, with one exception being the Ramsey AM25 which has a small hand-wound transformer. But the shortwave transmitters on the blogs titled Talking Pixie2 and Big Talker got their start with a schematic that shows a small Radio Shack transformer, 8-ohms to 1K, with no stated power handling capacity. Even though that transformer does function, I checked around and found a Triad audio transformer with a rating of 1-Watt, which seemed more in line with the circuits being used. It remains to be tested.

Right now I am only interested in your point of view about low power, Part 15, modulation transformers simply as a topic of conversation.

In the adult-sized world of power radio, making a comparison, a plate modulation transformer for a 50kW station might way a ton or more.

Down here in micro-radio, what kind of power rating should a modulation transformer have?

Filed Under: Uncategorized

About Carl Blare

Ambassador of Recreational Radio, owner operator of KDX Worldround Radio, webmaster for kdxradio.com, host of The Blare Blog.

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. radio8z says

    July 14, 2011 at 3:39 pm

    About One Half
    About one half the carrier power produced by the final. This is because the sidebands contain 1/2 the power of the carrier at full modulation. A 100 mW transmitter (100% efficient) would require 50 mW of audio power.

    The impedance matching is also a factor. Edit to Add: The impedance of the secondary should be approximately the final supply voltage divided by the current. For the high efficiency 100 mW transmitter I built this calculates to be 57 ohms. If this is typical of a 100 mW unit then an 8 ohm to 1k ohm transformer would not be a good choice since the 1k secondary Z is too high.

    Neil

    • Carl Blare says

      July 14, 2011 at 8:35 pm

      Switching to Big Talker
      These transformer comments link to Big Talker over on another thread…

      http://www.part15.us/node/2870#comment-13497

Primary Sidebar

Online Members

 No online members at the moment

Recent Posts

  • RichPowers

    Ultra long range Part 15 broadcasting (to space)

    While car makers appear to be opting for the licenced s...

    By RichPowers , 3 days ago

  • Mark

    Here's a look at why we do processing and what each function does.

    Shows for FM but applies to AM also.

    By Mark , 7 days ago

  • Mark

    RE: Early 80s Realty Radio' AM transmitters

    I don't think the audio quality would be that good on t...

    By Mark , 2 weeks ago

  • RichPowers

    RE: Early 80s Realty Radio' AM transmitters

    I was very tempted to buy them both, they were dirt che...

    By RichPowers , 2 weeks ago

  • RichPowers

    RE: Part 15 Too Restrictive for Automakers

    @mark I had to pause when you mentioned "15 minute citi...

    By RichPowers , 3 weeks ago

Recent Topics

  • Mark

    Here's a look at why we do processing and what each function does.

    By Mark 7 days ago

  • RichPowers

    Part 15 Too Restrictive for Automakers

    By RichPowers 3 weeks ago

  • RichPowers

    From Virtue to Vice - Music Morality

    By RichPowers 3 weeks ago

  • RichPowers

    affordable DAC Impressive Versatility “audiophile quality” Promising Big performance at small price

    By RichPowers 3 weeks ago

  • RichPowers

    New Canadian Resident?

    By RichPowers 4 weeks ago

Topic Tags

  • Carl Blare3
  • KDX RADIO3
  • WINDOZE3
  • Transmitter2
  • Radio Phvern2
  • station upgrade2
  • archive.org2
  • playlist2
  • Zara Radio2
  • #SW2101
View all tags (75)

Copyright © 2026 · Part15.org · Log in