• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Part15

Part15

License Free, legal, low-power radio broadcasting

  • About Us
  • Forums
  • Resources
  • Members
  • Contact Us
  • Log In

FCC Banning Some Mics

June 10, 2010 by Carl Blare

Some wireless mics are banned

http://www.wate.com/Global/story.asp?S=12583312

Filed Under: Uncategorized

About Carl Blare

Ambassador of Recreational Radio, owner operator of KDX Worldround Radio, webmaster for kdxradio.com, host of The Blare Blog.

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. wdcx says

    June 23, 2010 at 12:05 pm

    The FCC Van is in my
    The FCC Van is in my neighborhood right now scanning for mics!

    • WEAK-AM says

      June 23, 2010 at 9:50 pm

      Ha!
      They’re probably scanning for your Part 15 operation!

      But seriously, the microphone issue has been quite well publicized by manufacturers and dealers, so I would expect that most users have been aware of this for some months. And I do expect that there will be enforcement from the FCC.

    • kk7cw says

      June 24, 2010 at 3:50 pm

      Comment
      It is tough to believe that FCC inspectors have the time to scan for 700 MHz mics, what with all the donuts and coffee consumed. ‘Tell you what, we will all turn on all the old wireless mics we have at once and give them something to do. NOT!

      Another example of our federal tax dollars at work. I feel stimulated. Don’t you?

  2. Carl Blare says

    June 23, 2010 at 10:12 pm

    Memory Maybe
    I think I recall that the wireless mics are being kicked out to make room for big power and money players, public safety and cell phones or secret business, or some such.

    Where are the refundable vouchers to help pay for the expense?

    • mram1500 says

      June 23, 2010 at 11:30 pm

      Wireless 700 mHz mics on Public Safety frequencies
      Yes, currently our Public Safety radio system is being rebanded to the 700 mHz range. The rebanding will allow Cellular carriers to have a contiguous band of frequencies which I suppose aids there installations.

      Leaving the wireless mics on 700 mHz could/would cause problems for Police, Fire and other Public Safety agencies.

      The Cellular carrier is paying for this nationwide rebanding project which includes replacing Public Safety radios which can’t be rebanded.

      • Ermi Roos says

        June 24, 2010 at 12:48 am

        It’s true!
        On another website, and about another subject, wdcx assured me that he never lies. I actually never thought that that he lies, but I DID think that he sometimes made statements not in accord with the facts in order to be humorous. Having been corrected, I assume that it is true that an FCC van was going down his street and doing exactly what he said it was doing.

      • ongre says

        June 25, 2010 at 10:47 pm

        It also will remove and prevent interference.
        It turns out that Public Safety and private Cell carriers have such a different mission that they cannot coexist in the same frequency area. The receiver de-sense that occurs near cell sites immobilizes the Public safety radios. And it is a problem with all manufacturers and all over the country.

        The cell sites already have the ability to change frequencies turn on or off some “channels” due to need or what ever. Public safety normally uses dedicated sites and channels that reach a wider area, (generally, I speak here.) Big bucks are being spent by the players, it is in their interest to do so and not interfere with the Police and Firemen and others who use the public safety systems, many lawyers are making money on this issue. I don’t want to say much more, but also know that the system manufacturers are racking it in with this re-banding project thing.

Primary Sidebar

Online Members

 No online members at the moment

Recent Posts

  • RichPowers

    Ultra long range Part 15 broadcasting (to space)

    While car makers appear to be opting for the licenced s...

    By RichPowers , 1 day ago

  • Mark

    Here's a look at why we do processing and what each function does.

    Shows for FM but applies to AM also.

    By Mark , 5 days ago

  • Mark

    RE: Early 80s Realty Radio' AM transmitters

    I don't think the audio quality would be that good on t...

    By Mark , 2 weeks ago

  • RichPowers

    RE: Early 80s Realty Radio' AM transmitters

    I was very tempted to buy them both, they were dirt che...

    By RichPowers , 2 weeks ago

  • RichPowers

    RE: Part 15 Too Restrictive for Automakers

    @mark I had to pause when you mentioned "15 minute citi...

    By RichPowers , 2 weeks ago

Recent Topics

  • Mark

    Here's a look at why we do processing and what each function does.

    By Mark 5 days ago

  • RichPowers

    Part 15 Too Restrictive for Automakers

    By RichPowers 2 weeks ago

  • RichPowers

    From Virtue to Vice - Music Morality

    By RichPowers 3 weeks ago

  • RichPowers

    affordable DAC Impressive Versatility “audiophile quality” Promising Big performance at small price

    By RichPowers 3 weeks ago

  • RichPowers

    New Canadian Resident?

    By RichPowers 3 weeks ago

Topic Tags

  • Carl Blare3
  • KDX RADIO3
  • WINDOZE3
  • Transmitter2
  • Radio Phvern2
  • station upgrade2
  • archive.org2
  • playlist2
  • Zara Radio2
  • #SW2101
View all tags (75)

Copyright © 2026 · Part15.org · Log in