• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Part15

Part15

License Free, legal, low-power radio broadcasting

  • About Us
  • Forums
  • Resources
  • Members
  • Contact Us
  • Log In

END FED DIPOLE Picture

December 15, 2011 by MRAM

Here is a view from the ferrite ring choke looking towards the end of the antenna.

Here is a view from the ferrite ring choke looking towards the end of the antenna.

Starting at the right side is the choke. Half way to the tower is a strain relief where the coax ends and the center conductor continues.

At the end the antenna hangs from a spring which hangs from the guy wire. There is a string attached. The string was used to pull the antenna up the guy wire and is tied off at the tower.

Filed Under: Uncategorized

About MRAM

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Carl Blare says

    February 21, 2012 at 2:19 am

    Question About the Tower
    In MRAM’s picture we see his 55-foot tower, and my question has to do with such towers.

    I assume that tower, a metal structure, is bonded to the earth at its base, and is intended not to be an antenna, but to hold antennas raised up high.

    But for long wave operation under part 15 we need a 50-foot antenna that is isolated from ground. Is it possible to order a tower installation that is isolated from ground, so that the tower itself becomes an antenna?

    If not, how could a plain tower be employed to hold a proper 50-foot antenna isolated not only from ground, but also from the proximity of the tower itself?

    • rlkocher says

      February 21, 2012 at 4:05 am

      50 foot isolated antenna
      Carl – Several manufacturers make what you’re looking for, including MFJ Enterprises in Starkville, MS. They make a 64 foot 11 section telescopic aluminum mast that becomes an isolated antenna if you also buy their “base mount”. Rather expensive, tho…mast is $200…base mount is $70. I bought their mast several years ago — using it to support my ground plane for FM. I also bought the base mount, but never used it. So, if you can find a suitable mast with a 2″ OD bottom section, I have the base mount to isolate it from the ground with. Sell it to you for half price, ($35) brand new still in the box! If you need to buy MFJ’s mast, the stock number is MFJ-1965. The base mount number is MFJ-1900.
      Lemme know!

      P.S. — If you use the mast as an antenna only, and don’t mount anything on it, you shouldn’t need any guy wires for your 50 foot stick. Easy!

      • Carl Blare says

        February 21, 2012 at 5:13 pm

        Under Study
        Thank you rlkocher for the details.
        I will find out about local codes to find out if I can mount a 50′ tower without inviting weasels.

        If a 50′ tower can stand without guy wires, what keeps it from blowing over in a 15-mph wind?

        • mram1500 says

          February 22, 2012 at 2:03 am

          Shunt Fed Grounded Tower
          I have read articles describing a way to load a grounded tower. Seems similar to a J-Pole antenna.

          In most cases anything on top of the tower becomes part of a “top hat” load.

          I’ll have to look through my ARRL books to see if I can find that again.

          • rlkocher says

            February 22, 2012 at 5:56 am

            Tower staying power
            “If a 50′ tower can stand without guy wires, what keeps it from blowing over in a 15 mph wind?”

            A lot of it depends on how heavy the top is compared to the bottom. The mast I referenced is a telescopic model — bottom section is 2″ OD, top section is .625″ OD. So the bottom is much heavier than the top. That stablilizes it, so it just sways in the wind.

            You CANNOT however, mount an antenna on this mast at 50′, without using guy wires. (20′ would be ok) The weight on the top would cause it to buckle in the middle, even with just a breeze blowing!

  2. Carl Blare says

    October 3, 2014 at 5:13 pm

    Disputed Dipole

    The End Fed Dipole is not a dipole according to a post in the Revews of Reviews thread where the subject came up.

    Bringing back this Post From the Past we can see a real-life example of the End-Fed Dispute-Pole Antenna.

    • mram1500 says

      October 4, 2014 at 6:12 pm

      Not Your Traditional Dipole But A Dipole None The Less…

      Yes, a traditional dipole by definition has two legs and is fed at the center.  

      In that regard the vertical “coaxial” antenna has two legs and is center fed but the coax comes up through the inside of the cold side of the antenna (a metal tube) and connects to the upper hot side and the lower cold side at the center.  These were popular where horizontal radials were not desired.  Not your traditional dipole.

      Coaxial Antenna

      In a manner of speaking the coaxial antenna is end fed as the feedline enters the bottom end of the antenna.

      Taking it a little further the “end fed” dipole has two legs.  One leg, the hot side, is a single conductor.  The other leg, cold side, is of equal length but is continuous coax shield.  The cold “end” of the dipole is developed by the high impedance presented by the ferite choke.  Effectively the outside of the coax shield is an open circuit at that point.

      Wait a minute, if it’s effectively an open circuit how is it part of the active element?  Well just as for a regular dipole the RF flows along the inside of the shield.  Where it terminates at the center fed dipole RF can flow back along the outside of the shield.  This is why a balun is typically used at the feed point of a center fed dipole so the RF does not flow back the outside of the shield.

      So think about it…  For the end fed dipole the RF flows up the inside of the shield to the center of the antenna where the shield physically ends.  Then the RF flows back down the outside of the shield until it encounters the high impedance of the ferite choke.  So, effectively the RF is fed to the center of the end fed dipole much like the traditional dipole and the end result is the same as the traditional dipole.

Primary Sidebar

Online Members

 No online members at the moment

Recent Posts

  • RichPowers

    Ultra long range Part 15 broadcasting (to space)

    While car makers appear to be opting for the licenced s...

    By RichPowers , 1 day ago

  • Mark

    Here's a look at why we do processing and what each function does.

    Shows for FM but applies to AM also.

    By Mark , 5 days ago

  • Mark

    RE: Early 80s Realty Radio' AM transmitters

    I don't think the audio quality would be that good on t...

    By Mark , 2 weeks ago

  • RichPowers

    RE: Early 80s Realty Radio' AM transmitters

    I was very tempted to buy them both, they were dirt che...

    By RichPowers , 2 weeks ago

  • RichPowers

    RE: Part 15 Too Restrictive for Automakers

    @mark I had to pause when you mentioned "15 minute citi...

    By RichPowers , 2 weeks ago

Recent Topics

  • Mark

    Here's a look at why we do processing and what each function does.

    By Mark 5 days ago

  • RichPowers

    Part 15 Too Restrictive for Automakers

    By RichPowers 2 weeks ago

  • RichPowers

    From Virtue to Vice - Music Morality

    By RichPowers 3 weeks ago

  • RichPowers

    affordable DAC Impressive Versatility “audiophile quality” Promising Big performance at small price

    By RichPowers 3 weeks ago

  • RichPowers

    New Canadian Resident?

    By RichPowers 3 weeks ago

Topic Tags

  • Carl Blare3
  • KDX RADIO3
  • WINDOZE3
  • Transmitter2
  • Radio Phvern2
  • station upgrade2
  • archive.org2
  • playlist2
  • Zara Radio2
  • #SW2101
View all tags (75)

Copyright © 2026 · Part15.org · Log in