• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Part15

Part15

License Free, legal, low-power radio broadcasting

  • About Us
  • Forums
  • Resources
  • Members
  • Contact Us
  • Log In
Forums
Main Category
temp
Unsolved Technical ...
 
Notifications
Clear all

Unsolved Technical Problems

 
temp
Last Post by Anonymous 12 years ago
11 Posts
2 Users
0 Reactions
571 Views
RSS
 Carl Blare
(@carl-blare)
Posts: 2621
Famed Member Registered
Topic starter
 

This forum is inspired by Bruce MICRO1700 who opened three streams on distinct Part 15 topics.

We have many technical problems, and the radio engineers posting here can often share tips on how to solve them.

My opening problem has to do with audio distribution from a single radio program stream to multiple audio mediums.

The KDX program stream is fed by a Winamp Playlist, and at first branches into two outputs:

1.)  Output 1 is the DSP Chain, with Stereo Tool Audio Processing further branched to three online streaming servers. Because the online streams DO NOT require AM NRSC Pre-Emphasis, that feature is turned off in Stereo Tool;

2.)  Output 2 feeds the Winamp Direct Sound utility and delivers Stereo Tools Processed audio to AMT3000 and AMT5000 Transmitters, which are internally jumpered for NRSC Pre-Emphasis.

Perfect so far.

But we will be adding an LPB 2-20 AM Carrier Current Transmitter which does NOT have an internal NRSC feature.

The problem is simple - how can I generate NRSC Pre-Emphasis for the LPB Transmitter in a cost effective way?


 
Posted : 25/09/2014 6:17 pm
 Anonymous
(@Anonymous)
Posts: 0
 

transmitter?  Can you make a pre-emphasis

network with discrete parts that would be

low cost, and just put it in the line between

the 9030 and the CC transmitter?  Maybe not,

or you would have already tried it.  Oh I forgot -

do you still feed a Part 15 FM transmitter to get

your signal downstairs to the 9030?  How do

you get the signal downstairs to the LPB rig?

Bruce


 
Posted : 25/09/2014 6:38 pm
 Anonymous
(@Anonymous)
Posts: 0
 

Here's a link to a discussion about this.

http://www.antiqueradios.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=128055

Though more opinion than fact, two things to note are that AM radios have narrow IF bandwidth and the treble control can be used to de-emphasize the highs. But, again, this is opinion but a simple experiment could help you develop your own opinion.

The pre-emphasis is a simple roll up which can be done with a couple of Rs and a C but the problem is at the top of the audio band. A "brick wall" filter is needed which cuts about 50 dB from 9.6 to 10.5 kHz. This is not trivial.

My station does not use pre-emphasis and on portables and old radios it sounds fine. On my 2010 model truck radio it does sound a bit dull due to lack of highs but I can compensate with the treble boost.

Neil


 
Posted : 25/09/2014 6:41 pm
 Anonymous
(@Anonymous)
Posts: 0
 

Hi Carl,

Here's a simple solution. Move the preemphasis jumper in the AMT... transmitters to the OFF position. Turn on preemphais in Sterieo Toools for your Output 2. Feed all three transmitters from that output.

 


 
Posted : 25/09/2014 7:00 pm
 Anonymous
(@Anonymous)
Posts: 0
 

PhilB, my Winamp Stereo Tool combination also feeds three online audio streams, so the NRSC Pre-Emphasis in Stereo Tool is not an option.

Yes Bruce, the link to the LPB is via the Technics FM Tuner, and building a R-C network is an option, Neil.

Thing is Stereo Tool has a bandpass filter which I set 80 Hz to 5kHz.

Sounds fine.

This thread worked.

What is your next "Unsolved Technical Problem?"


 
Posted : 25/09/2014 7:32 pm
 Anonymous
(@Anonymous)
Posts: 0
 

This morning I reset the bandwidth of the Stereo Tool audio processing to 80 Hz - 10 kHz, as specified in the NRSC Pre-Emphasis Specification.

ALSO, forgotten in the above discussion, is the fact that in addition to driving three web stream servers, the Stereo Tool output also feeds a C.Crane FM Transmitter STL-to-LPB channel, another reason NRSC cannot be sent from Stereo Tool, but must be set within the AMT3000/5000 transmitter pair.

Neil's idea of a C and 2x R simple EQ network for the LPB will, as indicated above, solve this first Unsolved Technical Problem.


 
Posted : 26/09/2014 4:50 am
 Anonymous
(@Anonymous)
Posts: 0
 

Your audio distribution is complex and conflicting.

If I understand correctly you are feeding from one source (your computer with Winamp and Stereo Tools to a total of 3 servers (internal to the computer) and 3 actual physical audio connections (C. Crane FM, AMT3000 and AMT5000 transmitters). The various destinations call for different conflicting Stereo Tools settings.

The current Stereo Tools setting of 80-10K bandwidth is a needless limitation for the stream servers. The 10K upper limit is good for the AM transmitters, but you can't turn on NRSC preemphasis because of the stream servers. It really seams like it would be best to feed the stream servers separately from a separate instance of Stereo Tools. You could then set one instance of ST tailored to the streams and set the other instance of ST to full AM mode with the 10kHz limit and NRSC preemphasis. I don't know if you can do that without having two separate computers. You would know that better than I.

Otherwise, Neil's suggestion to put a simple RC network at the input to the LPB transmitter is good, but calculation of the actual R and C values depends on the actual audio input impedance of the LPB. Whatever is specified in the LPB manual may or may not be in the ballpark. You would need to calculate the R and C values to match the NRSC curve and then do some measurements and experimentation to get the final values. Or, more practical, would be to just use the calculated values and accept the possible inaccuracies.

Another solution would be to insert an inexpensive audio graphics equalizer at the input of the LPB and adjust it until you get an approximation of the NRSC preemphasis curve. Search the web. There are some that are only around $25. See for example: http://www.amazon.com/s/?ie=UTF8&keywords=graphic+equalizer+home+audio&tag=googhydr-20&index=electronics&hvadid=45258147182&hvpos=1t1&hvexid=&hvnetw=g&hvrand=14278739713019759797&hvpone=&hvptwo=&hvqmt=b&hvdev=c&ref=pd_sl_6ufqf45qbn_b

Either the RC filter or a graphics equalizer will take care of the NRSC preemphasis requirement and the Stereo Tools setting you selected will limit the upper audio bandwidth to 10kHz to take care of the NRSC "brick wall" cutoff.

It bothers me a bit that you are limiting you bandwidth to 10kHz on the stream servers, but if you are OK with that, then it's OK.


 
Posted : 27/09/2014 7:49 pm
 Anonymous
(@Anonymous)
Posts: 0
 

Setting aside for a moment the matter of audio bandwidth for AM transmission, we look at the specifications for audio bandwidth of streaming servers.

My server configurations are based on a belief that much of the world still suffers from low speed internet connections, older-slower computers, and perhaps a lot of dialup accounts.

While many streaming stations today send high bit-rates like 192kbps, I think they are limiting their audience to the most fortunate internet subscribers.

For a long time I ran a 16kbps stream, reasonable usable by dialup listeners, but turned it off due to non-use; no one listened to it.

Now my minimum stream rate is 32kbps,11,025kHz, stereo.

If the audio bandpass were set for that stream it would cut off at 5,512.5kHz sample rate (half of 11,025kHz).

This morning I connected and listened to that stream, and the audio remained clear without high-end artifacts from mismatched bandwidths. But the programming at the time was "old-time radio" followed by speech with a telephone guest. Likely there was no high frequency content.

Later today I will monitor the 32kbps stream again, during the broadcast of a Richard Strauss opera. This will be an ultimate test, because the Strauss is loud, harmonically very rich, and recorded by the world's best acoustic engineers for the WFMT Network of Chicago.

Is my thinking reasonable, or am I missing something?


 
Posted : 28/09/2014 9:03 am
 Anonymous
(@Anonymous)
Posts: 0
 

Having now heard close to an hour of sonically splended streaming coming across at 32kbps 11.025 kHz stereo, driven by Stereo Tool with a bandpass of 80 to 10 kHz, there is nothing to complain about.

The music quality is similar to an FM station sound a few years back using a 15 kHz equalized telephone line.

I must assume that the internet stream bandpass-limits itself... there is no high frequency disturbance detectable by this listener.

Each one of the mp3 audiofiles comprising a day's radio playlist come from different producers that use their own setups, and for that it's amazing how most of it is "broadcast quality."

The comment line remains open.


 
Posted : 28/09/2014 11:49 am
 Anonymous
(@Anonymous)
Posts: 0
 

As the only person available to respond to himself, because everyone else is downloading Oompah Hours, Free Minds Radio and Blare OnAir, here is an FM antenna post made last Wednesday on another thread, without response:

TWO of my certified FM transmitters do what I need...

The Whole House 2.0 gets signal 11-feet to a C.Crane Radio Plus receiver which is used for audio editing at 101.5 MHz.

The Scosche FMT4 gets signal at 88.9 MHz from one room to another to transfer vinyl discs for digitizing.

But the C.Crane FM transmitter at 89.5 MHz is plagued by multipathing in the 20-feet from here to the back room for audio link to the AMT5000.

I am thinking that vertical antennas might not be the best for indoor FM.

The human body is vertical, and competes for vertical space with the FM signal.

Also, consider that rooms are wider and longer than they are high, which seems more conducive to horizontal FM transmission.

So long as the directional nature of a horizontal antenna is accounted for, I am of the unproven belief that my indoor FM antennas should be horizontal.

Comments welcome, I will be reporting on test results.

Now I have to design a way of physically locating the transmitter/antenna for horizontal.


 
Posted : 28/09/2014 3:07 pm
 Anonymous
(@Anonymous)
Posts: 0
 

THIS website provides an example of what it will be like when the human population reaches near extinction.

But for now, it isn't humans near demise, it's AM radio and Part 15 Hobby Radio, owing to zombie culture... people walking around with massive cell-phone induced tumors.

AS a person without a cell phone, I am still able to post, and bring another technical issue to this "problem unsolved" thread:

News websites.

Alright, what do news websites have to do with Part 15?

EVERYTHING!

Not to mention that all computer components contain a Part 15 Boiler Plate Tag. AND also many Part 15 radio stations have websites EVEN IF THEY DO NOT STREAM.

Then there's the matter of news gathering for radio reporting, which requires visiting news websites.

FINALLY we reach the point of all this...

The news websites I visit tend to repeat and repeat the same news stories over and over so-as to appear more content filled, which causes fatigue.

AND news websites seem to have video advertisments that start playing automatically, which clutters the experience and causes distraction.

NOT ONLY THAT BUT many link choices lead off and off into a land of memory glut causing freezes and crashes.

Perhaps malware is throwing a picnic.

IN THE END it's just good to get out of there, without ever knowing the news.


 
Posted : 28/09/2014 4:33 pm
Forum Jump:
  Previous Topic
Next Topic  
Share:
Forum Information
Recent Posts
Unread Posts
Tags
  • 13 Forums
  • 7,740 Topics
  • 63.5 K Posts
  • 80 Online
  • 2,249 Members
Our newest member: electronic
Latest Post: 7 Beatles Misheard Lyrics
Forum Icons: Forum contains no unread posts Forum contains unread posts
Topic Icons: Not Replied Replied Active Hot Sticky Unapproved Solved Private Closed

Primary Sidebar

Online Members

 No online members at the moment

Recent Posts

  • Mark

    RE: 7 Beatles Misheard Lyrics

    Many songs have I heard something other than the actual...

    By Mark , 1 day ago

  • Mark

    RE: 7 Beatles Misheard Lyrics

    Have you heard this?

    By Mark , 1 day ago

  • RichPowers

    Unique AM Transmitter

    Here one I've not seen before. they're $69.50 on eBay, ...

    By RichPowers , 2 days ago

  • RichPowers

    7 Beatles Misheard Lyrics

    As far as I'm concerned this article is ridiculous, I d...

    By RichPowers , 2 days ago

  • Mark

    RE: Newly Discovered Robert Johnson in Stunning Clarity

    @richpowers Sounds good.

    By Mark , 2 days ago

Recent Topics

  • RichPowers

    Unique AM Transmitter

    By RichPowers 2 days ago

  • RichPowers

    7 Beatles Misheard Lyrics

    By RichPowers 2 days ago

  • RichPowers

    Public Domain Feature Films about Radio

    By RichPowers 3 days ago

  • RichPowers

    Speed Limit 17.3mph

    By RichPowers 5 days ago

  • ArtisanRadio

    Artisan Radio Pivots Again

    By ArtisanRadio 5 days ago

Topic Tags

  • Carl Blare3
  • KDX RADIO3
  • WINDOZE3
  • Transmitter2
  • Radio Phvern2
  • station upgrade2
  • archive.org2
  • playlist2
  • Zara Radio2
  • Carrier Current1
View all tags (74)

Copyright © 2026 · Part15.org · Log in

‹›×

    ‹›×