• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Part15

Part15

License Free, legal, low-power radio broadcasting

  • About Us
  • Forums
  • Resources
  • Members
  • Contact Us
  • Log In
Forums
Main Category
temp
The Dipole Antenna
 
Notifications
Clear all

The Dipole Antenna

 
temp
Last Post by Anonymous 12 years ago
9 Posts
2 Users
0 Reactions
578 Views
RSS
 wdcx
(@wdcx)
Posts: 444
Noble Member Registered
Topic starter
 

http://www.arrl.org/files/file/Technology/tis/info/pdf/9106023.pdf


 
Posted : 03/10/2014 9:58 am
 Anonymous
(@Anonymous)
Posts: 0
 

I have been trying to imagine how to achieve a horizontal dipolar antenna for the C.Crane.

The answer is...

http://www.progressive-concepts.com/products/transmission-equipment/fm-antennas/GP-32-Indoor-FM-Dipole-Antenna_PT292.html


 
Posted : 03/10/2014 3:07 pm
 Anonymous
(@Anonymous)
Posts: 0
 

From the link posted in Reply #2:

It is possible to install the antenna either in horizontal or vertical position, allowing ease of installation in restricted areas.

SPECIFICATIONS Impedance: 50 ohms Type: Dipole, Polarization: Vertical, etc

Can anyone explain how a linear dipole installed with its elements in the horizontal plane can be specified by its supplier to be vertically polarized?

PS:  Wouldn't changing the antenna of a Part 15 FM certified transmitter void its FCC certification?


 
Posted : 03/10/2014 4:35 pm
 Anonymous
(@Anonymous)
Posts: 0
 

The certification process exists for manufacturers to build legally saleable products under the FCC rules.

Once legally offered for sale the certification is fulfilled.

The purchaser of such equipment becomes responsible for upholding part 15 rules whether his equipment is certified or not.

The idea that an owner of such equipment can "void" the certification is fallacious.

If the certification were literally voided the manufacturer would need to recall the product and face violation notice or fines for selling uncertified equipment.


 
Posted : 03/10/2014 5:15 pm
 Anonymous
(@Anonymous)
Posts: 0
 

The only legal way to sell fully-built low power part 15 transmitters is to have them certified.

The only way to purchase an already built part 15 transmitter is to buy a certified one.


 
Posted : 03/10/2014 6:19 pm
 Anonymous
(@Anonymous)
Posts: 0
 

I always  have been trained to think that dipoles were around 70 ohms.


 
Posted : 06/10/2014 4:20 am
 Anonymous
(@Anonymous)
Posts: 0
 

I believe the dipole antenna supplied with my Technics Receiver uses 75-ohm flat-wire with a 75-ohm balun to whatever the unbalanced antenna jack is... guessing 50-ohms.... darn, I can't find the file on that.

But for a transmitter I would think that when the SWR is minimized on a particular setup, then you've got an impedance match whatever the impedance happens to be.

The fun part begins for me now, as I wait to become better informed.


 
Posted : 06/10/2014 10:50 am
 Anonymous
(@Anonymous)
Posts: 0
 

Yes, about 70 ohms for the traditional 1/2 wave dipole which really works better at about .47 to .48 wavelength.

It should be fed with balanced feedline which is why a balun is usually used with unbalanced coax at the feed point to prevent RF currents flowing back on the outside of the shield which skews the radiation pattern.

A folded dipole impedance is around 300 ohms which is great for use with balanced twin-lead (typical old style TV antenna.)  An impedance matching balun can be used with unbalanced coax to match the impedance of the antenna to the coax and convert balanced to unbalanced feedline.

The feedpoint impedance of a dipole will change with relation to the distance above ground.

From Radio-Electronics.com

The dipole can be used at odd multiples of the fundamental frequency.  For instance a 7 mHz dipole works great at 21 mHz.

From Radio-Electronics.com

This shows a dipole which is 3 half wavelengths, an odd multiple of the half wavelength.  The graph shows the feed point would have a low impedance at resonance (low voltage-high current.)


 
Posted : 06/10/2014 1:25 pm
 Anonymous
(@Anonymous)
Posts: 0
 

When I said 75-ohms I meant 300-ohms.

When I said "flat wire" I meant twin-lead.

And indeed, as gambled, fuller information arrived.

Thank you sir for your service to the lower power.


 
Posted : 06/10/2014 1:37 pm
Forum Jump:
  Previous Topic
Next Topic  
Share:
Forum Information
Recent Posts
Unread Posts
Tags
  • 13 Forums
  • 7,740 Topics
  • 63.5 K Posts
  • 32 Online
  • 2,249 Members
Our newest member: electronic
Latest Post: 7 Beatles Misheard Lyrics
Forum Icons: Forum contains no unread posts Forum contains unread posts
Topic Icons: Not Replied Replied Active Hot Sticky Unapproved Solved Private Closed

Primary Sidebar

Online Members

 No online members at the moment

Recent Posts

  • Mark

    RE: 7 Beatles Misheard Lyrics

    Many songs have I heard something other than the actual...

    By Mark , 1 day ago

  • Mark

    RE: 7 Beatles Misheard Lyrics

    Have you heard this?

    By Mark , 1 day ago

  • RichPowers

    Unique AM Transmitter

    Here one I've not seen before. they're $69.50 on eBay, ...

    By RichPowers , 2 days ago

  • RichPowers

    7 Beatles Misheard Lyrics

    As far as I'm concerned this article is ridiculous, I d...

    By RichPowers , 2 days ago

  • Mark

    RE: Newly Discovered Robert Johnson in Stunning Clarity

    @richpowers Sounds good.

    By Mark , 2 days ago

Recent Topics

  • RichPowers

    Unique AM Transmitter

    By RichPowers 2 days ago

  • RichPowers

    7 Beatles Misheard Lyrics

    By RichPowers 2 days ago

  • RichPowers

    Public Domain Feature Films about Radio

    By RichPowers 3 days ago

  • RichPowers

    Speed Limit 17.3mph

    By RichPowers 5 days ago

  • ArtisanRadio

    Artisan Radio Pivots Again

    By ArtisanRadio 5 days ago

Topic Tags

  • Carl Blare3
  • KDX RADIO3
  • WINDOZE3
  • Transmitter2
  • Radio Phvern2
  • station upgrade2
  • archive.org2
  • playlist2
  • Zara Radio2
  • Carrier Current1
View all tags (74)

Copyright © 2026 · Part15.org · Log in

‹›×

    ‹›×