• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Part15

Part15

License Free, legal, low-power radio broadcasting

  • About Us
  • Forums
  • Resources
  • Members
  • Contact Us
  • Log In
Forums
Main Category
temp
Take a look at this...
 
Notifications
Clear all

Take a look at this TIS Audio Proccessor

 
temp
Last Post by Anonymous 10 years ago
9 Posts
2 Users
0 Reactions
717 Views
RSS
 wdcx
(@wdcx)
Posts: 444
Noble Member Registered
Topic starter
 

http://www.theradiosource.com/products/tr6000-hq5.1-processor.htm

 

Listen to the 555 improve the audio.

 


 
Posted : 01/03/2016 5:21 am
 Anonymous
(@Anonymous)
Posts: 0
 

That looks like a copycat Inovonics 222, down to the exact placement of the LEDs, Switches, and pots. (Also Color, Size and Diminsions, I wonder if this actually IS a 222 that has been rebadged with a different faceplate)


 
Posted : 01/03/2016 5:30 am
 Anonymous
(@Anonymous)
Posts: 0
 

Looks identical


 
Posted : 01/03/2016 9:39 am
 Anonymous
(@Anonymous)
Posts: 0
 

It's a 222.  Special deal with the TIS guys.


 
Posted : 01/03/2016 11:40 am
 Anonymous
(@Anonymous)
Posts: 0
 

Couldn't be too special of a deal. In my experience, if you have to inquire on the cost, you can't afford it!


 
Posted : 01/03/2016 12:56 pm
 Anonymous
(@Anonymous)
Posts: 0
 

I just did one listen to each file, so it's not really an analysis, but as a 3 khz example, I liked file 1 better. File 2 seemed to just filter out the bass response, and sounded like it had more of a limiting effect. File 3 had better bandwidth on bass and treble, that was nice, though I could hear limiter bite pretty hard.

My rationale for liking file 1 is that having an extended bass response can make a signal with lack of upper frequency bandwidth sound smoother and more pleasant to listen to, as long at the bass isn't distorted and boomy. The old Comrex phone remote equipment was based on that idea, extending the bass of a 3 khz signal.

File 3 has good bass and highs, and aside for more apparent limiter biting, I can hear the sibilent frequencies more clearly.

It's all based on what's presented, assuming the transmitter is wideband, but what receiver is in use? Standard radio, or wideband monitor?

You're right, no price = boutique item, best served on a velvet draped pedestal. 🙂 If they just took a wideband Innovonics and adjusted a few things to make a TIS proceessor, it would seem to be better to engineer something made specifically for voice processing only and with the 5 khz bandwidth in mind.

Another viewpoint, all of this for traveler's stations? Is there any need? I've never heard a one of these stations do any meaningful public service. Here they're owned by the road department, I can hear half a dozen around the area, and all they do is run a test message, and it's been that way for years, and I mean every one I can hear. One was even on a traffic loop around in the middle of a construction area all around it, repeating a test message.


 
Posted : 01/03/2016 2:16 pm
 Anonymous
(@Anonymous)
Posts: 0
 

When they relaxed the AM TIS audio restriction, allowing 5 KHz, I disabled the TIS audio  filter in the transmitter we use for our AM TIS. 

I'm using the Sound Solution plugin to taylor the audio bandwidth and it does result in a clearer sounding audio program.

The plugin does the compression and limiting in addition to audio pass band filtering.


 
Posted : 01/03/2016 6:44 pm
 Anonymous
(@Anonymous)
Posts: 0
 

Sorry I shouldhave been more clear. the TIS guys have an arragment to rebrand the 222.  That's what I meant by special deal.


 
Posted : 02/03/2016 10:03 am
 Anonymous
(@Anonymous)
Posts: 0
 

Turns out these are modified as well. A Very special 222 indeed.


 
Posted : 09/03/2016 5:08 am
Forum Jump:
  Previous Topic
Next Topic  
Share:
Forum Information
Recent Posts
Unread Posts
Tags
  • 13 Forums
  • 7,756 Topics
  • 63.6 K Posts
  • 18 Online
  • 2,249 Members
Our newest member: electronic
Latest Post: Part 15 Too Restrictive for Automakers
Forum Icons: Forum contains no unread posts Forum contains unread posts
Topic Icons: Not Replied Replied Active Hot Sticky Unapproved Solved Private Closed

Primary Sidebar

Online Members

 No online members at the moment

Recent Posts

  • RichPowers

    Ultra long range Part 15 broadcasting (to space)

    While car makers appear to be opting for the licenced s...

    By RichPowers , 18 hours ago

  • Mark

    Here's a look at why we do processing and what each function does.

    Shows for FM but applies to AM also.

    By Mark , 4 days ago

  • Mark

    RE: Early 80s Realty Radio' AM transmitters

    I don't think the audio quality would be that good on t...

    By Mark , 2 weeks ago

  • RichPowers

    RE: Early 80s Realty Radio' AM transmitters

    I was very tempted to buy them both, they were dirt che...

    By RichPowers , 2 weeks ago

  • RichPowers

    RE: Part 15 Too Restrictive for Automakers

    @mark I had to pause when you mentioned "15 minute citi...

    By RichPowers , 2 weeks ago

Recent Topics

  • Mark

    Here's a look at why we do processing and what each function does.

    By Mark 4 days ago

  • RichPowers

    Part 15 Too Restrictive for Automakers

    By RichPowers 2 weeks ago

  • RichPowers

    From Virtue to Vice - Music Morality

    By RichPowers 3 weeks ago

  • RichPowers

    affordable DAC Impressive Versatility “audiophile quality” Promising Big performance at small price

    By RichPowers 3 weeks ago

  • RichPowers

    New Canadian Resident?

    By RichPowers 3 weeks ago

Topic Tags

  • Carl Blare3
  • KDX RADIO3
  • WINDOZE3
  • Transmitter2
  • Radio Phvern2
  • station upgrade2
  • archive.org2
  • playlist2
  • Zara Radio2
  • #SW2101
View all tags (75)

Copyright © 2026 · Part15.org · Log in

‹›×

    ‹›×