• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Part15

Part15

License Free, legal, low-power radio broadcasting

  • About Us
  • Forums
  • Resources
  • Members
  • Contact Us
  • Log In
Forums
Main Category
temp
Signal Strength
 
Notifications
Clear all

Signal Strength

 
temp
Last Post by Anonymous 12 years ago
4 Posts
2 Users
0 Reactions
703 Views
RSS
 Carl Blare
(@carl-blare)
Posts: 2621
Famed Member Registered
Topic starter
 

The part 15 rules for intentional radiation on the AM band are reasonable if this "permission" is intended to allow an individual to transmit to his own radios at home.

The combination of "100mW to the RF final" and "3-meter vertical antenna" produces just the right signal strength for use within one's home and adjacent property.

My kitchen radio is located 7-feet from my AMT5000 Wintenna installation (the metal window frame is part of the antenna), and the radio overloads from being "too close."

To reach the kitchen radio with less signal strength a second transmitter/antenna (different frequency) is located 35-feet away.

If the FCC allowed more AM signal strength all the radios in the house would over-load and it would be necessary to locate the transmitters outdoors somewhere as far away as possible, limited by the size of the yard.

It is probably true that the FCC never intended AM part 15 to reach a distant audience, although it is not expressly forbidden, for which reason much effort goes into doing just that.

Placing the transmitter in outdoor space with ground radials achieves amazing reach.


 
Posted : 04/03/2014 8:40 am
 Anonymous
(@Anonymous)
Posts: 0
 

Back in the 1950s people probably tried

to comply and many did not. 

The Knight Kit Phono Oscillator sure bridged

a much greater distance than anybody anticipated, 

I think.

What is great about you Carl, is that you see things

that the rest of us miss.  

Bruce, DOGRADIO


 
Posted : 04/03/2014 3:59 pm
 Anonymous
(@Anonymous)
Posts: 0
 

Interesting observation but here there has never been any overload observed with several radios in close proximity to the antenna. The only exception is when the AVC is turned to manual and cranked up too high on the BC-1004-C. None of the other radios have switchable AVC. I don't doubt your observation and just wanted to share mine.

And Bruce, you might not remember that I measured the DC input power to the final of the KnightKit broadcaster and it was 183 milliwatts with a 10 foot wire antenna attached but there was no matching network to the antenna so there probably was little radiation. The antenna was coupled via a series capacitor to the plate of the final which certainly enhanced the radiation of harmonics.

Despite this, good range was had when this was on the air back in the '50s. The band was much quieter and there was little QRM. AM BCB DXing was a joy then. (How's that for abbrevs. ?)

Neil


 
Posted : 05/03/2014 1:03 am
 Anonymous
(@Anonymous)
Posts: 0
 

I got so deeply involved with my Knight Kit back in the 1950s that I had wild thoughts...

For example, when I broadcast at 600kHz, the harmonic at 1200kHz was just as strong, and I was trying to think of a way to put separate audio on the harmonic, so that I'd have two transmitters in one!

I did not realize that my father's shortwave radio would have allowed me to hear the upper-upper harmonics.

Right about that time an FM station was testing subcarrier (SCA) transmission, and because I had no idea how that functioned, I liked to imagine that somehow I could "hide" a second transmission on top of my programming.

Now I am still trying to accomplish those same things.


 
Posted : 05/03/2014 6:11 am
Forum Jump:
  Previous Topic
Next Topic  
Share:
Forum Information
Recent Posts
Unread Posts
Tags
  • 13 Forums
  • 7,756 Topics
  • 63.6 K Posts
  • 16 Online
  • 2,249 Members
Our newest member: electronic
Latest Post: Part 15 Too Restrictive for Automakers
Forum Icons: Forum contains no unread posts Forum contains unread posts
Topic Icons: Not Replied Replied Active Hot Sticky Unapproved Solved Private Closed

Primary Sidebar

Online Members

 No online members at the moment

Recent Posts

  • RichPowers

    Ultra long range Part 15 broadcasting (to space)

    While car makers appear to be opting for the licenced s...

    By RichPowers , 18 hours ago

  • Mark

    Here's a look at why we do processing and what each function does.

    Shows for FM but applies to AM also.

    By Mark , 4 days ago

  • Mark

    RE: Early 80s Realty Radio' AM transmitters

    I don't think the audio quality would be that good on t...

    By Mark , 2 weeks ago

  • RichPowers

    RE: Early 80s Realty Radio' AM transmitters

    I was very tempted to buy them both, they were dirt che...

    By RichPowers , 2 weeks ago

  • RichPowers

    RE: Part 15 Too Restrictive for Automakers

    @mark I had to pause when you mentioned "15 minute citi...

    By RichPowers , 2 weeks ago

Recent Topics

  • Mark

    Here's a look at why we do processing and what each function does.

    By Mark 4 days ago

  • RichPowers

    Part 15 Too Restrictive for Automakers

    By RichPowers 2 weeks ago

  • RichPowers

    From Virtue to Vice - Music Morality

    By RichPowers 3 weeks ago

  • RichPowers

    affordable DAC Impressive Versatility “audiophile quality” Promising Big performance at small price

    By RichPowers 3 weeks ago

  • RichPowers

    New Canadian Resident?

    By RichPowers 3 weeks ago

Topic Tags

  • Carl Blare3
  • KDX RADIO3
  • WINDOZE3
  • Transmitter2
  • Radio Phvern2
  • station upgrade2
  • archive.org2
  • playlist2
  • Zara Radio2
  • #SW2101
View all tags (75)

Copyright © 2026 · Part15.org · Log in

‹›×

    ‹›×