• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Part15

Part15

License Free, legal, low-power radio broadcasting

  • About Us
  • Forums
  • Resources
  • Members
  • Contact Us
  • Log In
Forums
Main Category
temp
Quarter wavelength ...
 
Notifications
Clear all

Quarter wavelength question

 
temp
Last Post by Anonymous 20 years ago
8 Posts
2 Users
0 Reactions
835 Views
RSS
 YvesRoy
(@yvesroy)
Posts: 11
Eminent Member Registered
Topic starter
 

Hello,

A typical 100 mW AM transmitter with a 3-meter bottom loaded vertical antenna is about 1/4 mile. If, in a few years, Industry Canada would allow operate an AM transmitter more than 3 meters (let's say a quarter of wavelength)....

Hello,

A typical 100 mW AM transmitter with a 3-meter bottom loaded vertical antenna is about 1/4 mile. If, in a few years, Industry Canada would allow operate an AM transmitter more than 3 meters (let's say a quarter of wavelength)....

In this case, with the same power (100 mW), how range will be with a quarter wavelength vertical antenna *WITH* 12 radials of 10 foot copper wire? And *WITH* 120 radials of a quarter wavelength?

Yves


 
Posted : 07/10/2006 4:17 pm
 Anonymous
(@Anonymous)
Posts: 0
 

If, in a few years, Industry Canada would allow operate an AM transmitter more than 3 meters (let's say a quarter of wavelength). In this case, with the same power (100 mW), how range will be with a quarter wavelength vertical antenna *WITH* 12 radials of 10 foot copper wire? And *WITH* 120 radials of a quarter wavelength?

As always, MW "range" will depend on ground conductivity and path obstructions, quality of the receiving equipment, and interference levels at the receive site. But here are some general numbers based on the FCC's propagation curves, and estimating that the system with 12 radials each 10 feet long will be about 10% as efficient as with 120 radials each 1/4-wave long...

Freq = 1,600 kHz
Ground conductivity = 8 mS/m
Radiator = 1/4-wave vertical monopole
Distance to 250 uV/m contour:
- using 120 buried radials each 1/4-wave long = 7.7 miles
- using 12 buried radials each 10 feet long = 3.8 miles

//


 
Posted : 08/10/2006 3:10 am
 Anonymous
(@Anonymous)
Posts: 0
 

Thanks Rich!

Yves


 
Posted : 08/10/2006 4:15 am
 Anonymous
(@Anonymous)
Posts: 0
 

Hello Rich,

I know that a 3-meter base loaded vertical antenna with some 10 or 12 buried radials is 250 uV/m at 30 meters. My question is how range will be if the ground system would be 120 radials of quarter wavelength with 3-meter base loaded vertical antenna?

I know that is a very expensive task for installing 120 buried radials but i am just curious to see how far does go with this configuration?

Yves


 
Posted : 08/10/2006 1:07 pm
 Anonymous
(@Anonymous)
Posts: 0
 

I'm curious how a hamilton rangemaster would behave when placed at the top of a 1/4 wave monopole. Frequency would be 1700khz, NW NJ Ground Conductivity, hamilton grounded to 1/4 wave monopole and attached to the top of monopole which is attached to a 120 1/4 wave radials. of course it would have the 3m whip on the RF output.

Thank You,

Rev. Robert P. Chrysafis
Universal Life Ministries
http://www.ulc.org

Moderator Hunterdonfree
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/hunterdonfree


 
Posted : 08/10/2006 1:13 pm
 Anonymous
(@Anonymous)
Posts: 0
 

I know that a 3-meter base loaded vertical antenna with some 10 or 12 buried radials is 250 uV/m at 30 meters.

I believe that is too low, but I didn't bother to calculate the value.

My question is how range will be if the ground system would be 120 radials of quarter wavelength with 3-meter base loaded vertical antenna?

Using NEC and the FCC propagation curves for 1,600 kHz and 8 mS/m conductivity, the 250 µV/m contour from the system you describe would occur about 3 miles away.
//


 
Posted : 08/10/2006 1:48 pm
 Anonymous
(@Anonymous)
Posts: 0
 

Hello Rich,

I know that a 3-meter base loaded vertical antenna with some 10 or 12 buried radials is 250 uV/m at 30 meters.

I believe that is too low, but I didn't bother to calculate the value

So, at the frequency of 1600 kHz, can you give me how range is for a 10 foot base loaded vertical antenna with some 10 or 12 buried radials for 250 uV/m ? And with some 64 buried radials? My buried radials is 10 foot long of 20 GA copper wire.

Thanks in advance


 
Posted : 10/10/2006 4:55 pm
 Anonymous
(@Anonymous)
Posts: 0
 

So, at the frequency of 1600 kHz, can you give me how range is for a 10 foot base loaded vertical antenna with some 10 or 12 buried radials for 250 uV/m ? And with some 64 buried radials? My buried radials is 10 foot long of 20 GA copper wire.

There are too many unknowns here even to make a decent guess. It mostly depends on the r-f resistance in the ground system, and I have seen no published data relating this to your question.

The PDF paper in the link below shows an estimated field strength for what probably is a best case for a base-loaded Part 15 antenna system. But more likely than not, the r-f resistances in the two radial systems you ask about will be higher than the 10 ohms shown in this paper -- perhaps ~ 4X, or more.

http://filebay1.home.comcast.net/Elevated_Part_15_AM_Antennas.pdf

//


 
Posted : 11/10/2006 5:22 am
Forum Jump:
  Previous Topic
Next Topic  
Share:
Forum Information
Recent Posts
Unread Posts
Tags
  • 13 Forums
  • 7,756 Topics
  • 63.6 K Posts
  • 13 Online
  • 2,249 Members
Our newest member: electronic
Latest Post: Part 15 Too Restrictive for Automakers
Forum Icons: Forum contains no unread posts Forum contains unread posts
Topic Icons: Not Replied Replied Active Hot Sticky Unapproved Solved Private Closed

Primary Sidebar

Online Members

 No online members at the moment

Recent Posts

  • RichPowers

    Ultra long range Part 15 broadcasting (to space)

    While car makers appear to be opting for the licenced s...

    By RichPowers , 19 hours ago

  • Mark

    Here's a look at why we do processing and what each function does.

    Shows for FM but applies to AM also.

    By Mark , 4 days ago

  • Mark

    RE: Early 80s Realty Radio' AM transmitters

    I don't think the audio quality would be that good on t...

    By Mark , 2 weeks ago

  • RichPowers

    RE: Early 80s Realty Radio' AM transmitters

    I was very tempted to buy them both, they were dirt che...

    By RichPowers , 2 weeks ago

  • RichPowers

    RE: Part 15 Too Restrictive for Automakers

    @mark I had to pause when you mentioned "15 minute citi...

    By RichPowers , 2 weeks ago

Recent Topics

  • Mark

    Here's a look at why we do processing and what each function does.

    By Mark 4 days ago

  • RichPowers

    Part 15 Too Restrictive for Automakers

    By RichPowers 2 weeks ago

  • RichPowers

    From Virtue to Vice - Music Morality

    By RichPowers 3 weeks ago

  • RichPowers

    affordable DAC Impressive Versatility “audiophile quality” Promising Big performance at small price

    By RichPowers 3 weeks ago

  • RichPowers

    New Canadian Resident?

    By RichPowers 3 weeks ago

Topic Tags

  • Carl Blare3
  • KDX RADIO3
  • WINDOZE3
  • Transmitter2
  • Radio Phvern2
  • station upgrade2
  • archive.org2
  • playlist2
  • Zara Radio2
  • #SW2101
View all tags (75)

Copyright © 2026 · Part15.org · Log in

‹›×

    ‹›×