• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Part15

Part15

License Free, legal, low-power radio broadcasting

  • About Us
  • Forums
  • Resources
  • Members
  • Contact Us
  • Log In
Forums
Main Category
temp
PLL Problem Solved
 
Notifications
Clear all

PLL Problem Solved

 
temp
Last Post by Anonymous 10 years ago
4 Posts
2 Users
0 Reactions
772 Views
RSS
 radio8z
(@radio8z)
Posts: 248
Honorable Member
Topic starter
 

A few years back I built a phase locked loop circuit very similar to that of Tom Polk which is linked here: http://www.tompolk.com/radios/frequencysynthesizer/freqsynth.html My circuit topology was the same but some of the component values were different and this is not meant to be critical of Tom's design since his may or may not have the problem noted below.

When on the air with this PLL I noticed a background noise which sounded a bit like a wind whistle in a car and was especially apparent when listening to the carrier on a receiver set to CW mode. Typically, such noise is caused by phase jitter (phase noise) and this was confirmed by viewing the lock signal on pin one of the 74HCT4046 with a scope. There was over 1 microsecond of peak to peak jitter and on the spectrum analyser there appeared a strong subharmonic of the carrier at about 580 kHz.

I did a bit of homework and found this site: http://www.sm0vpo.com/ which is linked from Tom Polk's site. On this site follow projects> synthesizer circuits> improved CMOS synthesizer to find a schematic of a similar circuit. The author shows a schematic with a different loop filter connected to pins 9 and 13 of the 4046 which he claims narrows the skirt on the spectrum for the synthesizer. Since the phase jitter I saw would result in a wider skirt I thought it worth while to try this loop filter so it was installed in my PLL and the noise is now gone. The jitter is now less than 40 nanoseconds peak to peak and is inaudible on the transmitter signal and there is no longer a subharmonic in the spectrum.

If you are using or going to build this circuit it seems beneficial to use the loop filter shown on Harry's page.


 
Posted : 19/05/2016 2:19 pm
 Anonymous
(@Anonymous)
Posts: 0
 

Dude, that's the issue I'm having! I found that PLL unsuitable to even bother to amplify. It was on a posting started by Horseman of RADIODIRTYSPRING, where he'd built Tom Polk's PLL and also a full transmitter around it.

I was explaining my issues, and a guy came in from Europe, and says he uses a better loop filter, but hadn't gotten back to explain what he did. I'm glad you've confirmed that there's a better loop filter and that it does work. I was thinking of doing low pass filtering with L and C and all kinds of stuff. Here's Horseman's article, you'll see I had a similar problem..

http://www.part15.us/forum/part15-forums/transmitter-talk/my-homemade-pll-transmitter


 
Posted : 19/05/2016 3:56 pm
 Anonymous
(@Anonymous)
Posts: 0
 

Nate,

I recalled that thread but thought I would put this in a new thread to make it easier to find.  I had tried various values of R and C but that didn't help.  For a while I thought maybe there was something wrong with the timing of the TC and PE connection on the 40103 chip but this is a synchronous load and it looked good on the scope.  Note also that I am using the 74HCT series ICs rather than the usual CMOS chips which, according to the data sheet for the 4046, would be operating beyond the maximum frequency spec. The HCT series of chips handle this quite nicely though they require a regulated 5V supply for which I placed a 7805 regulator on board.  No heatsink was needed since this PLL draws 14 mA and the regulator runs cool with the 8VDC raw input..

The PLL board is part of this transmitter which I had published a while back: http://www.part15.us/forum/part15-forums/transmitter-talk/new-tube-transmitter-air  The noise was annoying enough but it was the sub harmonic at about 580 kHz in the transmitted signal that worried me.  It is now gone and the spectrum out of the transmitter antenna shows only some harmonics, the largest of which is -40dBc which is just fine to put on the air.

Neil

 


 
Posted : 19/05/2016 8:59 pm
 Anonymous
(@Anonymous)
Posts: 0
 

Brooce


 
Posted : 20/05/2016 3:10 am
Forum Jump:
  Previous Topic
Next Topic  
Share:
Forum Information
Recent Posts
Unread Posts
Tags
  • 13 Forums
  • 7,613 Topics
  • 62.8 K Posts
  • 16 Online
  • 2,243 Members
Our newest member: RaphaelKal
Latest Post: Jelly Roll Blues
Forum Icons: Forum contains no unread posts Forum contains unread posts
Topic Icons: Not Replied Replied Active Hot Sticky Unapproved Solved Private Closed

Primary Sidebar

Online Members

 No online members at the moment

Recent Posts

  • RichPowers

    RE: Public Domain Radio

    Sounds good.

    By RichPowers , 5 months ago

  • ArtisanRadio

    RE: Public Domain Radio

    I'd also like at some point to do a show, hosted by mys...

    By ArtisanRadio , 5 months ago

  • ArtisanRadio

    RE: Public Domain Radio

    When I played music that was not in the public domain, ...

    By ArtisanRadio , 5 months ago

  • RichPowers

    RE: Public Domain Radio

    The core concept of Part 15 AM has always been to provi...

    By RichPowers , 5 months ago

  • RichPowers

    RE: Public Domain Radio

    √1 - I guess there's not, but the potential exist, so f...

    By RichPowers , 5 months ago

Recent Topics

  • RichPowers

    Innovative "Syth-a-Sette" Turns Objects Into Music

    By RichPowers 5 months ago

  • Mark

    Neil Sedaka dies.

    By Mark 5 months ago

  • RichPowers

    Elvis AI?

    By RichPowers 5 months ago

  • RichPowers

    CB RADIO: Illinois CBer cited for 'broadcasting' on Channel 19

    By RichPowers 5 months ago

  • RichPowers

    Stamped pits vs organic dyes: CDs vs CD-R

    By RichPowers 5 months ago

Topic Tags

  • Carl Blare3
  • KDX RADIO3
  • WINDOZE3
  • Transmitter2
  • Radio Phvern2
  • station upgrade2
  • archive.org2
  • playlist2
  • Zara Radio2
  • Carrier Current1
View all tags (74)

Copyright © 2026 · Part15.org · Log in

‹›×

    ‹›×