• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Part15

Part15

License Free, legal, low-power radio broadcasting

  • About Us
  • Forums
  • Resources
  • Members
  • Contact Us
  • Log In
Forums
Main Category
temp
Part 15 TPO Calcula...
 
Notifications
Clear all

Part 15 TPO Calculator

 
temp
Last Post by Anonymous 10 years ago
5 Posts
2 Users
0 Reactions
489 Views
RSS
 wdcx
(@wdcx)
Posts: 444
Noble Member
Topic starter
 

http://bobgroome.us/Part15TPO/Part15TPO.htm


 
Posted : 24/08/2016 5:46 am
 Anonymous
(@Anonymous)
Posts: 0
 

Can we just say 12 nW?


 
Posted : 24/08/2016 7:14 am
 Anonymous
(@Anonymous)
Posts: 0
 

Carl from Ferguson said: "Can we just say 12 nW?"

John and the Resident Hobby Agent said: "That would no longer be functionally compliant."


 
Posted : 24/08/2016 8:19 am
 Anonymous
(@Anonymous)
Posts: 0
 

Per NEC4.2 analysis:

1) A power of 11.48... nW radiated by a matched, 1/2-wave dipole into free space produces a maximum field intensity of 250 µV/m at a distance of 3 meters from the transmit antenna.  This exactly meets FCC §15.239.

2) If that same setup is installed so that its dipole is vertical, and with its radiation center 10 meters above level earth having 5 mS/m d.c. 13 conductivity (average), then for a carrier frequency of 99.9 MHz its maximum field intensity at 3 meters would rise to about 393 µV/m -- due to the presence of earth reflections.

3) If it is installed using different frequencies with different heights/different polarizations/different antenna types/different earth conductivities, then the answers will be different than in 2) above.

So as in many cases, a simple question or set of assumptions does not mean that the (accurate) answer will be simple, or apply to all conditions.

An inaccurate conclusion can be stated with great precision, but it is still an inaccurate conclusion.


 
Posted : 24/08/2016 10:02 am
 Anonymous
(@Anonymous)
Posts: 0
 

One seeks to apprehend the Rules so as to comprehend them.

The foregoing lesson on distinquishing between precision and accuracy serves the latter and contributes toward critical thinking as as a tool for both.


 
Posted : 24/08/2016 10:44 am
Forum Jump:
  Previous Topic
Next Topic  
Share:
Forum Information
Recent Posts
Unread Posts
Tags
  • 13 Forums
  • 7,613 Topics
  • 62.8 K Posts
  • 12 Online
  • 2,243 Members
Our newest member: RaphaelKal
Latest Post: Jelly Roll Blues
Forum Icons: Forum contains no unread posts Forum contains unread posts
Topic Icons: Not Replied Replied Active Hot Sticky Unapproved Solved Private Closed

Primary Sidebar

Online Members

 No online members at the moment

Recent Posts

  • RichPowers

    RE: Public Domain Radio

    Sounds good.

    By RichPowers , 5 months ago

  • ArtisanRadio

    RE: Public Domain Radio

    I'd also like at some point to do a show, hosted by mys...

    By ArtisanRadio , 5 months ago

  • ArtisanRadio

    RE: Public Domain Radio

    When I played music that was not in the public domain, ...

    By ArtisanRadio , 5 months ago

  • RichPowers

    RE: Public Domain Radio

    The core concept of Part 15 AM has always been to provi...

    By RichPowers , 5 months ago

  • RichPowers

    RE: Public Domain Radio

    √1 - I guess there's not, but the potential exist, so f...

    By RichPowers , 5 months ago

Recent Topics

  • RichPowers

    Innovative "Syth-a-Sette" Turns Objects Into Music

    By RichPowers 5 months ago

  • Mark

    Neil Sedaka dies.

    By Mark 5 months ago

  • RichPowers

    Elvis AI?

    By RichPowers 5 months ago

  • RichPowers

    CB RADIO: Illinois CBer cited for 'broadcasting' on Channel 19

    By RichPowers 5 months ago

  • RichPowers

    Stamped pits vs organic dyes: CDs vs CD-R

    By RichPowers 5 months ago

Topic Tags

  • Carl Blare3
  • KDX RADIO3
  • WINDOZE3
  • Transmitter2
  • Radio Phvern2
  • station upgrade2
  • archive.org2
  • playlist2
  • Zara Radio2
  • Carrier Current1
View all tags (74)

Copyright © 2026 · Part15.org · Log in

‹›×

    ‹›×