• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Part15

Part15

License Free, legal, low-power radio broadcasting

  • About Us
  • Forums
  • Resources
  • Members
  • Contact Us
  • Log In
Forums
Main Category
temp
New Part 15 FM Tran...
 
Notifications
Clear all

New Part 15 FM Transmitter

 
temp
Last Post by Anonymous 15 years ago
6 Posts
2 Users
0 Reactions
728 Views
RSS
 tbone903
(@tbone903)
Posts: 16
Eminent Member Registered
Topic starter
 

Wonder if anyone had a chance to play with one of these?

http://progressive-concepts.com/info/item.php?id=801

It would be even nicer, if it was a stereo input.

Wonder if anyone had a chance to play with one of these?

http://progressive-concepts.com/info/item.php?id=801

It would be even nicer, if it was a stereo input.

Also, interesting to note, that this Part 15 Certified transmitter has an output of approximately 10 mW. (Maybe they meant 10uW??)


 
Posted : 03/08/2011 10:11 pm
 Anonymous
(@Anonymous)
Posts: 0
 

I guess they do have a stereo version...

What I meant to say is that it would be nicer, if it didn't cost $500 smackers!


 
Posted : 03/08/2011 10:14 pm
 Anonymous
(@Anonymous)
Posts: 0
 

For that kinda moolah, it must outperform a Decade of comparable value, which I doubt. However, there is certainly added value for the digital optical inputs and onboard DA converter.


 
Posted : 04/08/2011 1:12 pm
 Anonymous
(@Anonymous)
Posts: 0
 

The ACC100 was a decent FM transmitter. I found that it had a problem with hum, until I replaced the supplied wall wart with a much better one that had some regulation.

I'm not sure that adding a digital input to a Part 15 FM transmitter is really worth it - kind of overkill, I would think. The range limitations for noise free sound really outweigh the need to improve FM sound quality. And you're going to want the mono version to get the best range in any event. I don't know if they've done any other redesigning (they do say it's the equivalent of the ACC100), but I would have thought you would have gotten more bang for your buck if they improved the on board voltage regulation.

I'm still looking for that transmitter that is the equivalent of the Rangemaster, but on FM (i.e., a board in a weatherproof box, can be mounted outside as high as possible to get you free of obstructions). Hopefully Decade (or someone else) is listening.


 
Posted : 05/08/2011 8:20 am
 Anonymous
(@Anonymous)
Posts: 0
 

"I'm not sure that adding a digital input to a Part 15 FM transmitter is really worth it - kind of overkill, I would think."

To some degree, it depends on the quality of the D/A converter in the unit, but keeping a digital signal in the digital domain as far as possible is always desirable. S/PDIF signals are not nearly as susceptible to RF interference, and TOSlink not at all, therefore, a digital signal arriving at the transmitter will be the same as that coming from the CD, rather than one previously converted to analog and carried on line-level wire, especially in an environment where RFI is prevalent.

Anyway, I suppose that's the reasoning behind having digital inputs in the unit.


 
Posted : 05/08/2011 10:09 am
 Anonymous
(@Anonymous)
Posts: 0
 

I do understand all that - I guess in my mind that's a poor tradeoff versus other improvements you could make to the transmitter - one that will only transmit 200 feet or so. I doubt very much that you'll notice any difference over an FM radio between an analogue input and a digital one. Now, removing hum - that's noticeable. Improving range as much as legally possible - that's noticeable.


 
Posted : 05/08/2011 3:45 pm
Forum Jump:
  Previous Topic
Next Topic  
Share:
Forum Information
Recent Posts
Unread Posts
Tags
  • 13 Forums
  • 7,756 Topics
  • 63.6 K Posts
  • 33 Online
  • 2,249 Members
Our newest member: electronic
Latest Post: Here's a look at why we do processing and what each function does.
Forum Icons: Forum contains no unread posts Forum contains unread posts
Topic Icons: Not Replied Replied Active Hot Sticky Unapproved Solved Private Closed

Primary Sidebar

Online Members

 No online members at the moment

Recent Posts

  • Mark

    Here's a look at why we do processing and what each function does.

    Shows for FM but applies to AM also.

    By Mark , 3 days ago

  • Mark

    RE: Early 80s Realty Radio' AM transmitters

    I don't think the audio quality would be that good on t...

    By Mark , 2 weeks ago

  • RichPowers

    RE: Early 80s Realty Radio' AM transmitters

    I was very tempted to buy them both, they were dirt che...

    By RichPowers , 2 weeks ago

  • RichPowers

    RE: Part 15 Too Restrictive for Automakers

    @mark I had to pause when you mentioned "15 minute citi...

    By RichPowers , 2 weeks ago

  • Mark

    RE: Part 15 Too Restrictive for Automakers

    Your last part.... "It all very interesting but all I...

    By Mark , 2 weeks ago

Recent Topics

  • Mark

    Here's a look at why we do processing and what each function does.

    By Mark 3 days ago

  • RichPowers

    Part 15 Too Restrictive for Automakers

    By RichPowers 2 weeks ago

  • RichPowers

    From Virtue to Vice - Music Morality

    By RichPowers 3 weeks ago

  • RichPowers

    affordable DAC Impressive Versatility “audiophile quality” Promising Big performance at small price

    By RichPowers 3 weeks ago

  • RichPowers

    New Canadian Resident?

    By RichPowers 3 weeks ago

Topic Tags

  • Carl Blare3
  • KDX RADIO3
  • WINDOZE3
  • Transmitter2
  • Radio Phvern2
  • station upgrade2
  • archive.org2
  • playlist2
  • Zara Radio2
  • #SW2101
View all tags (75)

Copyright © 2026 · Part15.org · Log in

‹›×

    ‹›×