• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Part15

Part15

License Free, legal, low-power radio broadcasting

  • About Us
  • Forums
  • Resources
  • Members
  • Contact Us
  • Log In
Forums
Main Category
temp
My own Part 15.247 ...
 
Notifications
Clear all

My own Part 15.247 Cell Site

 
temp
Last Post by Anonymous 19 years ago
3 Posts
2 Users
0 Reactions
396 Views
RSS
 jpjanze
(@jpjanze)
Posts: 506
Member Admin
Topic starter
 

Check this out. Just with the rubber duck and the base sitting on a shelf in the house I got over 1/4 of a mile. of course there is no foilage on the trees right now.

Check this out. Just with the rubber duck and the base sitting on a shelf in the house I got over 1/4 of a mile. of course there is no foilage on the trees right now.

http://cgi.ebay.com/EnGenius-Telephone_W0QQitemZ200179873449QQihZ010QQcategoryZ33930QQssPageNameZWDVWQQrdZ1QQcmdZViewItem

It came with a 6Dbi 900 mhz ground plane, and 20m of coax. the coax has 3db loss. so i am only outputting 2 Watts ERP when under 247 we are allowed 4 Watts. plus the base antenna that comes with it is a chincy POS. Just a mobile cell antenna over a groundplane. I like fiberglass antenna's.

My answer to that problem? I got one of these...

http://www.wlanparts.com/product/KP-20/KP20_900MHz_92dBi_OmniDirectional_Antenna.html

Now I will have the legal 4 watt ERP output 🙂

I have not set up the base antenna yet. I estimate with the base setup i'll make it to the ends of town.

the phone uses FH-TDD-CDMA

Frequency Hopping, Time Division Duplex, Code Division Multiple Access.

the base outputs 900mW the handset 600mW On 900 Mhz ISM Band

https://gullfoss2.fcc.gov/oetcf/eas/reports/GenericSearch.cfm

FCC ID: NI3-SN-920U

Grantee Code: NI3

Product code: -SN-920U


 
Posted : 21/12/2007 6:11 am
 Anonymous
(@Anonymous)
Posts: 0
 

Ahhh, yes. Good 'ole Engenius. We setup a couple of these at work a few years ago. We have a hard time ordering parts with our sub-par purchasing department, so we were lucky to get our hands on the phone systems. Actually, the first one we received was a demo unit that we got to keep. I don't know how quickly we got the second unit. We had a unit on both ends of our facility (a theme park). One antenna was on a 50 foot tower, the other on a ~75 foot tower. The included coax wasn't long enough, so we had to extend it with a length of Belden 9913. Needless to say, our units didn't perform as well as yours is performing.

I had to remove the antenna connector from the base unit and replace it with a panel-mount jack of something we had. I think the base unit had a reverse-thread TNC or something. I think the base antenna is something off-the-wall as well, but I can't remember. We're not using the units right now, though I'd like to get them up and running again sometime. I have some unused 1/2" hardline running up both towers now, so I'd like to try and use that instead of the included coax and 9913.

Chris


 
Posted : 23/12/2007 10:12 am
 Anonymous
(@Anonymous)
Posts: 0
 

Keep the coax under 60ft. Better yet get a NEMA enclosure from a WiFi parts suplier and mount the phone base right up at the base of the antenna. rune power and telephone up to the base. if you have it 50ft up then use a 6dbi or less gain antenna and not that crappy cellular antenna over a ground plane. get a real fiberglass omnidirectional. USE LMR-400 or better. make sure you get an antenna that has at least a 3 degree electrical downtilt.

You will be amazed what these little improvements will do. of course lots of metal and brick will kill a low power microwave signal very quickly.

I can't advise furthur w/o knowing more.

Thank You,

Rev. Robert P. Chrysafis
Universal Life Ministries
http://www.ulc.org

Moderator Hunterdonfree
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/hunterdonfree


 
Posted : 23/12/2007 7:38 pm
Forum Jump:
  Previous Topic
Next Topic  
Share:
Forum Information
Recent Posts
Unread Posts
Tags
  • 13 Forums
  • 7,756 Topics
  • 63.6 K Posts
  • 11 Online
  • 2,249 Members
Our newest member: electronic
Latest Post: Part 15 Too Restrictive for Automakers
Forum Icons: Forum contains no unread posts Forum contains unread posts
Topic Icons: Not Replied Replied Active Hot Sticky Unapproved Solved Private Closed

Primary Sidebar

Online Members

 No online members at the moment

Recent Posts

  • RichPowers

    Ultra long range Part 15 broadcasting (to space)

    While car makers appear to be opting for the licenced s...

    By RichPowers , 1 day ago

  • Mark

    Here's a look at why we do processing and what each function does.

    Shows for FM but applies to AM also.

    By Mark , 5 days ago

  • Mark

    RE: Early 80s Realty Radio' AM transmitters

    I don't think the audio quality would be that good on t...

    By Mark , 2 weeks ago

  • RichPowers

    RE: Early 80s Realty Radio' AM transmitters

    I was very tempted to buy them both, they were dirt che...

    By RichPowers , 2 weeks ago

  • RichPowers

    RE: Part 15 Too Restrictive for Automakers

    @mark I had to pause when you mentioned "15 minute citi...

    By RichPowers , 2 weeks ago

Recent Topics

  • Mark

    Here's a look at why we do processing and what each function does.

    By Mark 5 days ago

  • RichPowers

    Part 15 Too Restrictive for Automakers

    By RichPowers 2 weeks ago

  • RichPowers

    From Virtue to Vice - Music Morality

    By RichPowers 3 weeks ago

  • RichPowers

    affordable DAC Impressive Versatility “audiophile quality” Promising Big performance at small price

    By RichPowers 3 weeks ago

  • RichPowers

    New Canadian Resident?

    By RichPowers 3 weeks ago

Topic Tags

  • Carl Blare3
  • KDX RADIO3
  • WINDOZE3
  • Transmitter2
  • Radio Phvern2
  • station upgrade2
  • archive.org2
  • playlist2
  • Zara Radio2
  • #SW2101
View all tags (75)

Copyright © 2026 · Part15.org · Log in

‹›×

    ‹›×