• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Part15

Part15

License Free, legal, low-power radio broadcasting

  • About Us
  • Forums
  • Resources
  • Members
  • Contact Us
  • Log In
Forums
Main Category
temp
More about antenna ...
 
Notifications
Clear all

More about antenna tuning

 
Page 2 / 2 Prev
temp
Last Post by Anonymous 16 years ago
17 Posts
2 Users
0 Reactions
1,825 Views
RSS
 Anonymous
(@Anonymous)
Posts: 0
 

From a purely theoretical perspective it is likely very true that a capacitor would degrade the Q of a perfect coil. In many practical applications the Q of the matching coil might not be the determining factor of the sucess of the total assembly.

This is because the bandwidth of such a ridiculously short antenna (3 meters for the AM BCB) is so impossibly narrow that the possibility of achieving a match with the coil alone is nearly impossible for the average experimenter.

While adding an air cap will likely degrade Q, the ability to fine tune the total assembly for a better match sometimes results in better range in spite of the reduced Q.

This is why the air cap is an often-recommended tuning aid - it's not perfect, in fact it might even be a detriment to one side of the equation, but it can sometimes help the situation in total - a beneficial compromise, so to speak.

One of my favorite quotes - "Don't let perfect be the enemy of good"


 
Posted : 03/08/2010 6:27 am
 Anonymous
(@Anonymous)
Posts: 0
 

Thanks for all the help.

I think I'm going to try tuning at the lower point, then raise it on the mast. I tried it with the new coil (more about that in another thread) at the lower point. With no tuning at all, it got out 1500 feet in some areas, on 1630kHz, which is where I designed the system to work. Not too bad. I'm going ahead with tuning the antenna. then raise it on the mast and see what I get.


 
Posted : 03/08/2010 11:52 am
Page 2 / 2 Prev
Forum Jump:
  Previous Topic
Next Topic  
Share:
Forum Information
Recent Posts
Unread Posts
Tags
  • 13 Forums
  • 7,756 Topics
  • 63.6 K Posts
  • 14 Online
  • 2,249 Members
Our newest member: electronic
Latest Post: Part 15 Too Restrictive for Automakers
Forum Icons: Forum contains no unread posts Forum contains unread posts
Topic Icons: Not Replied Replied Active Hot Sticky Unapproved Solved Private Closed

Primary Sidebar

Online Members

 No online members at the moment

Recent Posts

  • RichPowers

    Ultra long range Part 15 broadcasting (to space)

    While car makers appear to be opting for the licenced s...

    By RichPowers , 1 day ago

  • Mark

    Here's a look at why we do processing and what each function does.

    Shows for FM but applies to AM also.

    By Mark , 5 days ago

  • Mark

    RE: Early 80s Realty Radio' AM transmitters

    I don't think the audio quality would be that good on t...

    By Mark , 2 weeks ago

  • RichPowers

    RE: Early 80s Realty Radio' AM transmitters

    I was very tempted to buy them both, they were dirt che...

    By RichPowers , 2 weeks ago

  • RichPowers

    RE: Part 15 Too Restrictive for Automakers

    @mark I had to pause when you mentioned "15 minute citi...

    By RichPowers , 2 weeks ago

Recent Topics

  • Mark

    Here's a look at why we do processing and what each function does.

    By Mark 5 days ago

  • RichPowers

    Part 15 Too Restrictive for Automakers

    By RichPowers 2 weeks ago

  • RichPowers

    From Virtue to Vice - Music Morality

    By RichPowers 3 weeks ago

  • RichPowers

    affordable DAC Impressive Versatility “audiophile quality” Promising Big performance at small price

    By RichPowers 3 weeks ago

  • RichPowers

    New Canadian Resident?

    By RichPowers 3 weeks ago

Topic Tags

  • Carl Blare3
  • KDX RADIO3
  • WINDOZE3
  • Transmitter2
  • Radio Phvern2
  • station upgrade2
  • archive.org2
  • playlist2
  • Zara Radio2
  • #SW2101
View all tags (75)

Copyright © 2026 · Part15.org · Log in

‹›×

    ‹›×