• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Part15

Part15

License Free, legal, low-power radio broadcasting

  • About Us
  • Forums
  • Resources
  • Members
  • Contact Us
  • Log In
Forums
Main Category
temp
Modulation?
 
Notifications
Clear all

Modulation?

 
temp
Last Post by Anonymous 21 years ago
4 Posts
2 Users
0 Reactions
485 Views
RSS
 Ebacherville
(@ebacherville)
Posts: 10
Eminent Member
Topic starter
 

Modulation?

I found a TX that had the ability for 125% modulation.. what would this do , why would it be a benifit..

Jason


 
Posted : 31/10/2005 6:56 pm
 Anonymous
(@Anonymous)
Posts: 0
 

I was under the impression that overmodulation would be contrary to FCC rules, which is why stations have limiters in the audio chain to prevent overmodulation. On the technical side I believ that overmodulation would send the signal farther out and possibly accross adjacent channels.


 
Posted : 01/11/2005 7:34 am
 Anonymous
(@Anonymous)
Posts: 0
 

I was under the impression that overmodulation would be contrary to FCC rules, which is why stations have limiters in the audio chain to prevent overmodulation. On the technical side I believ that overmodulation would send the signal farther out and possibly accross adjacent channels.

Amplitude modulation by positive-going audio peaks can exceed 100% without causing excessive adjacent channel interference. It is only the negative-going peaks that cannot exceed 100% -- which will cause interference.

AM broadcast stations typically use audio processors that create or enhance the asymmetry in the peaks of the audio waveform. The negative-going peaks modulate the transmitter to 100% negative modulation, and the positive-going peaks to 125% modulation (the FCC maximum permitted).

These processors also raise the average value of the audio waveform, because the average value is what determines subjective "loudness" in an audio waveform.
//


 
Posted : 01/11/2005 9:16 am
 Anonymous
(@Anonymous)
Posts: 0
 

Thank you Rich, I stand corrected. I remembered there was a stautory modulation limit, I forgot it was 125% not 100%.


 
Posted : 01/11/2005 2:43 pm
Forum Jump:
  Previous Topic
Next Topic  
Share:
Forum Information
Recent Posts
Unread Posts
Tags
  • 13 Forums
  • 7,613 Topics
  • 62.8 K Posts
  • 17 Online
  • 2,243 Members
Our newest member: RaphaelKal
Latest Post: Jelly Roll Blues
Forum Icons: Forum contains no unread posts Forum contains unread posts
Topic Icons: Not Replied Replied Active Hot Sticky Unapproved Solved Private Closed

Primary Sidebar

Online Members

 No online members at the moment

Recent Posts

  • RichPowers

    RE: Public Domain Radio

    Sounds good.

    By RichPowers , 5 months ago

  • ArtisanRadio

    RE: Public Domain Radio

    I'd also like at some point to do a show, hosted by mys...

    By ArtisanRadio , 5 months ago

  • ArtisanRadio

    RE: Public Domain Radio

    When I played music that was not in the public domain, ...

    By ArtisanRadio , 5 months ago

  • RichPowers

    RE: Public Domain Radio

    The core concept of Part 15 AM has always been to provi...

    By RichPowers , 5 months ago

  • RichPowers

    RE: Public Domain Radio

    √1 - I guess there's not, but the potential exist, so f...

    By RichPowers , 5 months ago

Recent Topics

  • RichPowers

    Innovative "Syth-a-Sette" Turns Objects Into Music

    By RichPowers 5 months ago

  • Mark

    Neil Sedaka dies.

    By Mark 5 months ago

  • RichPowers

    Elvis AI?

    By RichPowers 5 months ago

  • RichPowers

    CB RADIO: Illinois CBer cited for 'broadcasting' on Channel 19

    By RichPowers 5 months ago

  • RichPowers

    Stamped pits vs organic dyes: CDs vs CD-R

    By RichPowers 5 months ago

Topic Tags

  • Carl Blare3
  • KDX RADIO3
  • WINDOZE3
  • Transmitter2
  • Radio Phvern2
  • station upgrade2
  • archive.org2
  • playlist2
  • Zara Radio2
  • Carrier Current1
View all tags (74)

Copyright © 2026 · Part15.org · Log in

‹›×

    ‹›×