• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Part15

Part15

License Free, legal, low-power radio broadcasting

  • About Us
  • Forums
  • Resources
  • Members
  • Contact Us
  • Log In
Forums
Main Category
temp
measuring FM deviat...
 
Notifications
Clear all

measuring FM deviation / occupied band width

 
temp
Last Post by Anonymous 12 years ago
4 Posts
2 Users
0 Reactions
551 Views
RSS
 jpjanze
(@jpjanze)
Posts: 506
Member Admin
Topic starter
 

no mod monitors available to me so I did a little experiment with what I had

on hand to check my FM occupied bandwidth.

this is what I did.

Tools:

Atenn AT5005 spec analyzer
Carver TX11b with aftermarket IF Tap
RG 58 with BNC connectors

hookup:

Spec An set to 88.9 (my operating frequency) set for 0.200 scan width and
video filter enabled connected via RG58 to the IF out of the TX11b which was
also set to 88.9

is this the proper setup and settings to read my occupied bandwidth for FM?

it looked to me that I was slightly under 200khz total occupied bandwidth if
I did everything right.


 
Posted : 24/07/2014 7:19 pm
 Anonymous
(@Anonymous)
Posts: 0
 

Hi, Robert,

What you describe is correct in theory but there is a "gotcha". The signal you view on the spectrum analyzer is tapped from the tuner IF and it will be limited in bandwidth by the tuner IF bandpass characteristics. Many receivers do not have 200 kHz bandwidth since the lower the IF bandwidth the higher the selectivity of the tuner.

Your tuner may be OK but it is likely that you are not seeing enough bandwidth to allow an accurate measurement of your transmitter bandwidth. It is possible that higher frequency components are being filtered out by the IF bandwidth.

A search on the spectrum analyzer you listed shows an operating frequency range up to 500 MHz so it appears that it can be used to directly observe the transmitter output. This would eliminate questions about the the tuner bandwidth. This connection could be via a pickup wire near the FM transmitter antenna. If this doesn't give a usable signal then a direct connection possibly through a series resistor to somewhat isolate the analyzer input from the transmitter to avoid loading effects may work.

Connecting to the transmitter output would also allow you to check for harmonics up to the fifth.

Neil


 
Posted : 25/07/2014 6:12 am
 Anonymous
(@Anonymous)
Posts: 0
 

What a great tuner.  I've read about it

in the FM DX blogs.

I have a tuner with a deviation meter,

but the tuner is 30 years old with serious

problems.  Anyway, it's a Kenwood KT-8300. 

A beautiful piece of gear.  It just fails every

once in a while, so it's not dependable.  I've

had a lot of really good people check it out,

and they haven't been able to find the problem. 

But it does have a meter marked FM deviation

on the front panel.  Just thought I'd mention

it for fun.

Good luck with your project. 

Bruce, Mon. Stn., CT


 
Posted : 26/07/2014 2:35 pm
 Anonymous
(@Anonymous)
Posts: 0
 

I was an FM deviate.

Oh, woops... maybe I misunderstood the subject.


 
Posted : 26/07/2014 2:39 pm
Forum Jump:
  Previous Topic
Next Topic  
Share:
Forum Information
Recent Posts
Unread Posts
Tags
  • 13 Forums
  • 7,756 Topics
  • 63.6 K Posts
  • 13 Online
  • 2,249 Members
Our newest member: electronic
Latest Post: Part 15 Too Restrictive for Automakers
Forum Icons: Forum contains no unread posts Forum contains unread posts
Topic Icons: Not Replied Replied Active Hot Sticky Unapproved Solved Private Closed

Primary Sidebar

Online Members

 No online members at the moment

Recent Posts

  • RichPowers

    Ultra long range Part 15 broadcasting (to space)

    While car makers appear to be opting for the licenced s...

    By RichPowers , 24 hours ago

  • Mark

    Here's a look at why we do processing and what each function does.

    Shows for FM but applies to AM also.

    By Mark , 5 days ago

  • Mark

    RE: Early 80s Realty Radio' AM transmitters

    I don't think the audio quality would be that good on t...

    By Mark , 2 weeks ago

  • RichPowers

    RE: Early 80s Realty Radio' AM transmitters

    I was very tempted to buy them both, they were dirt che...

    By RichPowers , 2 weeks ago

  • RichPowers

    RE: Part 15 Too Restrictive for Automakers

    @mark I had to pause when you mentioned "15 minute citi...

    By RichPowers , 2 weeks ago

Recent Topics

  • Mark

    Here's a look at why we do processing and what each function does.

    By Mark 5 days ago

  • RichPowers

    Part 15 Too Restrictive for Automakers

    By RichPowers 2 weeks ago

  • RichPowers

    From Virtue to Vice - Music Morality

    By RichPowers 3 weeks ago

  • RichPowers

    affordable DAC Impressive Versatility “audiophile quality” Promising Big performance at small price

    By RichPowers 3 weeks ago

  • RichPowers

    New Canadian Resident?

    By RichPowers 3 weeks ago

Topic Tags

  • Carl Blare3
  • KDX RADIO3
  • WINDOZE3
  • Transmitter2
  • Radio Phvern2
  • station upgrade2
  • archive.org2
  • playlist2
  • Zara Radio2
  • #SW2101
View all tags (75)

Copyright © 2026 · Part15.org · Log in

‹›×

    ‹›×