• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Part15

Part15

License Free, legal, low-power radio broadcasting

  • About Us
  • Forums
  • Resources
  • Members
  • Contact Us
  • Log In
Forums
Main Category
temp
Loop Antenna
 
Notifications
Clear all

Loop Antenna

 
temp
Last Post by Anonymous 17 years ago
6 Posts
2 Users
0 Reactions
712 Views
RSS
 Carl Blare
(@carl-blare)
Posts: 2621
Famed Member Registered
Topic starter
 

Loop antennas for reception are very common because of their compact size, but I have never heard of a loop antenna for transmission. If they worked, that would be great for people with limited space.

Comments?


 
Posted : 16/02/2009 7:33 pm
 Anonymous
(@Anonymous)
Posts: 0
 

There certainly are loop antennas for transmission, but they are not useful for Part 15 AM. One reason (and not the only one) is that, most likely, the Section 15.219(b) 3 m length limit includes the length of the wire in the loop. The length of a single-turn loop is slightly more than three times the diameter. This makes a very inefficient use of the 3 m length limit; and therefore, the vertical monopole is a much more efficient antenna to use.


 
Posted : 16/02/2009 10:23 pm
 Anonymous
(@Anonymous)
Posts: 0
 

Ermi Roos is right, and I found a calculator which demonstrates how inefficient a Part 15 transmitting loop would be. You enter the numbers and the calculations automatically give you all the important numbers.

http://www.66pacific.com/calculators/small_tx_loop_calc.aspx


 
Posted : 18/02/2009 3:15 pm
 Anonymous
(@Anonymous)
Posts: 0
 

The difference as I understand it is that the calculations do not take into account an RF network, which would be necessary to tune it.


 
Posted : 22/10/2009 11:34 pm
 Anonymous
(@Anonymous)
Posts: 0
 

http://www.aa5tb.com/loop.html
More Loop Stuff


 
Posted : 23/10/2009 6:06 am
 Anonymous
(@Anonymous)
Posts: 0
 

What's interesting to me about loops is that when using some of the rudimentary modeling software, a certain consequence of calculation can be observed.

We start with a common antenna form, the base loaded vertical. One interesting exercise is to reduce the length vertical element and increase the length of the base loading coil (while keeping the diameter of the coil the same) and watch the various factors change as the antenna becomes a helical radiator.

Another exercise, more relevant to the loop discussion, is to again start with a base loaded vertical and then shorten the vertical radiator and increase the diameter of the base loading coil while keeping its length constant, until you have a loop.

most likely, the Section 15.219(b) 3 m length limit includes the length of the wire in the loop

I would suggest that, for experimentation purposes, this is the kind of thinking to stay away from. The interpretation could just as easily be 3 Meters in diameter for a loop.

Furthermore, physics and all those dreary equations indicate that any configuration of a radiator that has an ultimate limiting dimension of 3 meters (even a cube of copper coils, 3 Meters on a side) will be so inefficient at the AM BCB that such antennas will cause the FCC very little in the way of worry about some kind of frightening range increase using any of the strategies so far discussed.

For us, it will always be a game of inches but something mildly helpful is always possible.

And don't forget the discontinous loop 🙂


 
Posted : 23/10/2009 8:26 am
Forum Jump:
  Previous Topic
Next Topic  
Share:
Forum Information
Recent Posts
Unread Posts
Tags
  • 13 Forums
  • 7,756 Topics
  • 63.6 K Posts
  • 8 Online
  • 2,249 Members
Our newest member: electronic
Latest Post: Part 15 Too Restrictive for Automakers
Forum Icons: Forum contains no unread posts Forum contains unread posts
Topic Icons: Not Replied Replied Active Hot Sticky Unapproved Solved Private Closed

Primary Sidebar

Online Members

 No online members at the moment

Recent Posts

  • RichPowers

    Ultra long range Part 15 broadcasting (to space)

    While car makers appear to be opting for the licenced s...

    By RichPowers , 13 hours ago

  • Mark

    Here's a look at why we do processing and what each function does.

    Shows for FM but applies to AM also.

    By Mark , 4 days ago

  • Mark

    RE: Early 80s Realty Radio' AM transmitters

    I don't think the audio quality would be that good on t...

    By Mark , 2 weeks ago

  • RichPowers

    RE: Early 80s Realty Radio' AM transmitters

    I was very tempted to buy them both, they were dirt che...

    By RichPowers , 2 weeks ago

  • RichPowers

    RE: Part 15 Too Restrictive for Automakers

    @mark I had to pause when you mentioned "15 minute citi...

    By RichPowers , 2 weeks ago

Recent Topics

  • Mark

    Here's a look at why we do processing and what each function does.

    By Mark 4 days ago

  • RichPowers

    Part 15 Too Restrictive for Automakers

    By RichPowers 2 weeks ago

  • RichPowers

    From Virtue to Vice - Music Morality

    By RichPowers 3 weeks ago

  • RichPowers

    affordable DAC Impressive Versatility “audiophile quality” Promising Big performance at small price

    By RichPowers 3 weeks ago

  • RichPowers

    New Canadian Resident?

    By RichPowers 3 weeks ago

Topic Tags

  • Carl Blare3
  • KDX RADIO3
  • WINDOZE3
  • Transmitter2
  • Radio Phvern2
  • station upgrade2
  • archive.org2
  • playlist2
  • Zara Radio2
  • #SW2101
View all tags (75)

Copyright © 2026 · Part15.org · Log in

‹›×

    ‹›×