• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Part15

Part15

License Free, legal, low-power radio broadcasting

  • About Us
  • Forums
  • Resources
  • Members
  • Contact Us
  • Log In
Forums
Main Category
temp
i might have solved...
 
Notifications
Clear all

i might have solved the Q problem with a near-center loaded ant.

 
temp
Last Post by Anonymous 10 years ago
12 Posts
2 Users
0 Reactions
574 Views
RSS
 RADIODIRTYSPRINGS1700
(@radiodirtysprings1700)
Posts: 14
Eminent Member Registered
Topic starter
 

basically a trip to home depot got me a 4" diameter PVC pipe and some aluminum flashing. used ratchet straps to secure the flashing around the pipe to bolt it all on. i did a coil inductor 1/3 of the way up the antenna in a space between the flashing, and i left a cpl feet for transmitter/feedline mounting below the antenna. for the loading coil i took a smaller PVC pipe with taps at every turn, attached the sheild to the bottom of it, and center to the roachclip for quick and precise tuning and run a 120pf arco trimmer from top of that to ground. now i did this test with no earth, heater, or electrical ground outside of what the small piece of coax sheild presented. i got a 1:1.3 match on center, and a 1:1.5 swr 10khz to either side, and 2:1 20khz after that, according to my $65 chinese ant. analyzer.

now, to see how well it radiates.


 
Posted : 03/10/2016 6:14 am
 Anonymous
(@Anonymous)
Posts: 0
 

Pictures Please?


 
Posted : 03/10/2016 8:55 am
 Anonymous
(@Anonymous)
Posts: 0
 

You've got my interest

Bruce.


 
Posted : 03/10/2016 9:01 am
 Anonymous
(@Anonymous)
Posts: 0
 

Yes , pictures please

Barry of BBR World Wide


 
Posted : 03/10/2016 11:51 am
 Anonymous
(@Anonymous)
Posts: 0
 

i will upon doing more testing. getting rained out in a minute here, and i gotta bolt the tuning coil pipe onto the main pipe better

 


 
Posted : 03/10/2016 2:02 pm
 Anonymous
(@Anonymous)
Posts: 0
 

... i might have solved the Q problem with a near-center loaded ant. ...

_________

Is that "Q problem" the result of a higher system Q, or a lower system Q compared to base-loading and resonating a ground-mounted, ~3-meter, Part 15 AM vertical monopole (other things equal)?


 
Posted : 03/10/2016 2:09 pm
 Anonymous
(@Anonymous)
Posts: 0
 

E-H antenna


 
Posted : 03/10/2016 2:51 pm
 Anonymous
(@Anonymous)
Posts: 0
 

... sounds like he built an E-H antenna

The theory that a transmit antenna system can generate an E field separately from an H field has been thoroughly disproven -- per the original equations of James Clerk Maxwell, and practical experience to date with configurations claimed, or believed to be E-H antennas.


 
Posted : 03/10/2016 3:07 pm
 Anonymous
(@Anonymous)
Posts: 0
 

its not quite an EH. its setup like a standard centerloaded vertical with a transmatch and cap to fine tune at the bottom. the Q problem we most often face comes with reduced fidelity from the sidebands getting chopped with a lot of shortened verts. even without an earth or pipe ground, i got a good SWR curve which is as i understand it, the worst case scenario. after reading about centerloaded being superior in signal but inferior in fidelity, a 4" diameter wide radiator seems like the only way to do it

 


 
Posted : 03/10/2016 3:25 pm
 Anonymous
(@Anonymous)
Posts: 0
 

Not to hijack this thread, but here is a link to a lot of info on experiments made with Electrically Short Antennas (ESA's), including the E-H. http://www.m0rzf.co.uk/EEF/index.html


 
Posted : 03/10/2016 5:41 pm
 Anonymous
(@Anonymous)
Posts: 0
 

 Thank you for reminding me of a trannsmatch. I often wondered why you couldn't use those antenna matchers to actually tune in your AM transmitter. I remember Radio Shack used to sell an SWR matcher that went from 1 megahertz to 30 megahertz. I often wondered what would happen if I connected one of those between my AM transmitter and the antenna. Probably could use it on the talking house with the F connector and then just simply change or use an adapter to go from the F connector to a pl-259 connector. Then to the antenna matcher then to the antenna. But you would have to have an SWR meter between the transmitter and the antenna matcher. I remember two dials on that antenna matcher and you would simply tune 1 then the next one the first one you would turn to try to get the lowest SWR and then you would turn the second one and go back and forth for the best results. So if you could find a watt meter with an SWR meter that went from 1 megahertz to 30 megahertz you would be rocking out pretty good.

 

 now sense the tram antenna for CB is helical I think it could do quite well with an antenna matcher. I remember how good those antennas work and they are around three meters. So with that being said you would have a pretty good ready-made antenna that all you have to do is use an antenna matcher with it.


 
Posted : 03/10/2016 10:04 pm
 Anonymous
(@Anonymous)
Posts: 0
 

my chinese sweatshop antenna analyzer says its 43ohms and 1:1.3 SWR at center, fairly consistent between 1500-1680 depending on where the cap is set on one of the taps. im fairly sure the certified transmitters running with a choked off ground work on the same principle, only with torroidals instead of the pvc,wire, and roachclip taps.


 
Posted : 04/10/2016 8:57 am
Forum Jump:
  Previous Topic
Next Topic  
Share:
Forum Information
Recent Posts
Unread Posts
Tags
  • 13 Forums
  • 7,756 Topics
  • 63.6 K Posts
  • 10 Online
  • 2,249 Members
Our newest member: electronic
Latest Post: Part 15 Too Restrictive for Automakers
Forum Icons: Forum contains no unread posts Forum contains unread posts
Topic Icons: Not Replied Replied Active Hot Sticky Unapproved Solved Private Closed

Primary Sidebar

Online Members

 No online members at the moment

Recent Posts

  • RichPowers

    Ultra long range Part 15 broadcasting (to space)

    While car makers appear to be opting for the licenced s...

    By RichPowers , 12 hours ago

  • Mark

    Here's a look at why we do processing and what each function does.

    Shows for FM but applies to AM also.

    By Mark , 4 days ago

  • Mark

    RE: Early 80s Realty Radio' AM transmitters

    I don't think the audio quality would be that good on t...

    By Mark , 2 weeks ago

  • RichPowers

    RE: Early 80s Realty Radio' AM transmitters

    I was very tempted to buy them both, they were dirt che...

    By RichPowers , 2 weeks ago

  • RichPowers

    RE: Part 15 Too Restrictive for Automakers

    @mark I had to pause when you mentioned "15 minute citi...

    By RichPowers , 2 weeks ago

Recent Topics

  • Mark

    Here's a look at why we do processing and what each function does.

    By Mark 4 days ago

  • RichPowers

    Part 15 Too Restrictive for Automakers

    By RichPowers 2 weeks ago

  • RichPowers

    From Virtue to Vice - Music Morality

    By RichPowers 3 weeks ago

  • RichPowers

    affordable DAC Impressive Versatility “audiophile quality” Promising Big performance at small price

    By RichPowers 3 weeks ago

  • RichPowers

    New Canadian Resident?

    By RichPowers 3 weeks ago

Topic Tags

  • Carl Blare3
  • KDX RADIO3
  • WINDOZE3
  • Transmitter2
  • Radio Phvern2
  • station upgrade2
  • archive.org2
  • playlist2
  • Zara Radio2
  • #SW2101
View all tags (75)

Copyright © 2026 · Part15.org · Log in

‹›×

    ‹›×