• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Part15

Part15

License Free, legal, low-power radio broadcasting

  • About Us
  • Forums
  • Resources
  • Members
  • Contact Us
  • Log In
Forums
Main Category
temp
From Orban about As...
 
Notifications
Clear all

From Orban about Asymmetrical Modulation

 
temp
Last Post by Anonymous 12 years ago
3 Posts
2 Users
0 Reactions
625 Views
RSS
 wdcx
(@wdcx)
Posts: 444
Noble Member
Topic starter
 

Orban:
'While the physics of carrier pinch-off limit any AM modulation system to an absolute 
negative modulation limit of 100%, it is possible to modulate positive peaks as high 
as desired. In the United States, the FCC permits positive peaks of up to 125% modulation. Many countries have similar restrictions. 
However, many transmitters cannot achieve such modulation without substantial 
distortion, if they can achieve it at all. The transmitter's power supply can sometimes 
be strengthened to correct this. Sometimes, RF drive capability to the final power 
amplifier must be increased. 
Voice, by its nature, is substantially asymmetrical. Therefore, asymmetrical modulation was popular at one time in an attempt to increase the loudness of voice. Traditionally, this was achieved by preserving the natural asymmetry of the voice signal. 
An asymmetry detector reversed the polarity of the signal to maintain greater positive modulation. The peaks were then clipped to a level of -100%, +125%. 
OPTIMOD-AM takes a different approach: OPTIMOD-AM's input conditioning filter 
contains a time dispersion circuit (phase scrambler) that makes asymmetrical input 
material, like voice, substantially symmetrical. 
OPTIMOD-AM permits symmetrical or asymmetrical operation of both the safety 
clipper and multiband distortion-canceling clipper. Asymmetrical clipping slightly increases loudness and brightness, and can produce dense positive peaks up to 125%. 
However, such asymmetrical processing by its very nature produces both odd and 
even-order harmonic and IM distortion. While even-order harmonic distortion may 
sound pleasingly bright, IM distortion of any order sounds nasty. 
There is really nothing lost by not modulating asymmetrically: Listening tests easily 
demonstrate that modulating symmetrically, if time dispersion has been applied to 
the audio, produces a considerably louder and cleaner sound than does asymmetrical modulation that retains the natural asymmetry of its program material. 
Some of the newer transmitters of the pulse-width modulation type have circuitry 
for holding the carrier shift constant with modulation. Since artificial asymmetry can 
introduce short-term DC components (corresponding to dynamic upward carrier 
shift), such carrier shift cancellation circuitry can become confused, resulting in further distortion."

 


 
Posted : 31/07/2014 11:45 am
 Anonymous
(@Anonymous)
Posts: 0
 

Bob Orban wrote that about 35 years ago. His first AM Optimod had a phase flipper to maintain positive peaks. The problem with phase flippers is that they are annoying to on air talent if they are monitoring themselves off air in real time. The stuff about transmitter capability went away decades ago. Most modern transmitters can easily reach 150 to 160% positive modulation. 

To my knowledge, nobody has ever manufactured a processor for assymmetrical modulation. To properly accomplish asymmetry one must start at the individual microphone inputs and assure the peaks are going in the correct direction. Then every compression and limiting section in the processing chain that employs peak detection must either have positive peak detection disabled or at least be adjusted to a higher threshold. This can be done if attention is paid to every detail. I have done it at numerous stations and it does in fact sound better and more open than phase scrambled audio. 

All that said, the usual method is to just clip the negative peaks until the positives reach the desired level.


 
Posted : 31/07/2014 11:56 am
 Anonymous
(@Anonymous)
Posts: 0
 

http://www.nrscstandards.org/SG/NRSC-1-B.pdf


 
Posted : 31/07/2014 11:59 am
Forum Jump:
  Previous Topic
Next Topic  
Share:
Forum Information
Recent Posts
Unread Posts
Tags
  • 13 Forums
  • 7,613 Topics
  • 62.8 K Posts
  • 7 Online
  • 2,243 Members
Our newest member: RaphaelKal
Latest Post: Jelly Roll Blues
Forum Icons: Forum contains no unread posts Forum contains unread posts
Topic Icons: Not Replied Replied Active Hot Sticky Unapproved Solved Private Closed

Primary Sidebar

Online Members

 No online members at the moment

Recent Posts

  • RichPowers

    RE: Public Domain Radio

    Sounds good.

    By RichPowers , 5 months ago

  • ArtisanRadio

    RE: Public Domain Radio

    I'd also like at some point to do a show, hosted by mys...

    By ArtisanRadio , 5 months ago

  • ArtisanRadio

    RE: Public Domain Radio

    When I played music that was not in the public domain, ...

    By ArtisanRadio , 5 months ago

  • RichPowers

    RE: Public Domain Radio

    The core concept of Part 15 AM has always been to provi...

    By RichPowers , 5 months ago

  • RichPowers

    RE: Public Domain Radio

    √1 - I guess there's not, but the potential exist, so f...

    By RichPowers , 5 months ago

Recent Topics

  • RichPowers

    Innovative "Syth-a-Sette" Turns Objects Into Music

    By RichPowers 5 months ago

  • Mark

    Neil Sedaka dies.

    By Mark 5 months ago

  • RichPowers

    Elvis AI?

    By RichPowers 5 months ago

  • RichPowers

    CB RADIO: Illinois CBer cited for 'broadcasting' on Channel 19

    By RichPowers 5 months ago

  • RichPowers

    Stamped pits vs organic dyes: CDs vs CD-R

    By RichPowers 5 months ago

Topic Tags

  • Carl Blare3
  • KDX RADIO3
  • WINDOZE3
  • Transmitter2
  • Radio Phvern2
  • station upgrade2
  • archive.org2
  • playlist2
  • Zara Radio2
  • Carrier Current1
View all tags (74)

Copyright © 2026 · Part15.org · Log in

‹›×

    ‹›×