• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Part15

Part15

License Free, legal, low-power radio broadcasting

  • About Us
  • Forums
  • Resources
  • Members
  • Contact Us
  • Log In
Forums
Main Category
temp
FM Ground plane
 
Notifications
Clear all

FM Ground plane

 
temp
Last Post by Anonymous 15 years ago
6 Posts
2 Users
0 Reactions
674 Views
RSS
 mighty1650
(@mighty1650)
Posts: 58
Estimable Member Registered
Topic starter
 

Well I had an idea.

What if I added metal underneath my FM transmitter.

Well I had an idea.

What if I added metal underneath my FM transmitter.
So I took a sheet of aluminum foil and placed it under the FM transmitter. Without the foil with my radios antenna fully collapsed I would lose the signal at the end of my fence. with a signal meter reading of 2 (about 5db)
(of course if the antenna was stuck out at all the signal would immediately come back with a vengeance)

With the foil ground plane the signal shot up to about a signal meter reading of 3 (-10 db)

This was quite a significant difference. SO i figured, why not add more foil!

SO I added more foil and took another reading. The meter was now reading about 4.5 on the meter (darn near -60 db!)

I'll have to do a signal test tomorrow to see if I get out better. If the backyard proved to be that much different I can only hope its that much different for the neighborhood.

Looks like even a little bit a foil can help get the most out of our little FM miliwatts! More results tomorrow!


 
Posted : 22/04/2011 4:44 pm
 Anonymous
(@Anonymous)
Posts: 0
 

The Crow I am glad you opened this subject at this time, because I have been looking at my 4-element cage monopole and becoming concerned that I never designed a ground (other than that supplied by power and audio connection). At 101.9 FM with Wholehouse 2.0 the signal doesn't do very well, but maybe a well planned ground would pick things up.


 
Posted : 22/04/2011 6:21 pm
 Anonymous
(@Anonymous)
Posts: 0
 

Alrighty,
Heres the results!
The Verdict, POSITIVE!

The ground plane has made a noticeable change in signal quality.
Improvements are noted
Better Building Penetration
Improved signal distance
Improved ability to resist interference
Improved resistance to multipath

My signal would always abruptly cut off at the stop sign at the end of the street. With the ground plane in place the signal is now, although slightly staticy,listenable over the little bump at the stop sign. I noticed when cruising the side streets the signal had a better time going through the buildings then previously before, and that me walking through the house no longer causes multipath on the signal.
Overall I say a ground plane (even a cheap tin foil one) is a Must need for the part 15 FM broadcaster wanting to get the most out of his miliwatt.


 
Posted : 24/04/2011 10:53 am
 Anonymous
(@Anonymous)
Posts: 0
 

Same reason antennas on cars roofs improve the signal. However in that scenario, the transmitter is connected to ground through it's power connection, so the metal roof is also ground, and forms a decent ground plane.

If your foil isn't connected to good ground, try that and see what happens.


 
Posted : 24/04/2011 12:42 pm
 Anonymous
(@Anonymous)
Posts: 0
 

Thank you The Crow for your report. I am convinced now of the need for ground systems designed for the antenna/frequency band being used.

Well, almost everyone else already knew this, but I am just now catching up on ground.

There should be a dedicated course in tech school:
Ground 101


 
Posted : 24/04/2011 12:54 pm
 Anonymous
(@Anonymous)
Posts: 0
 

Good grounding is always important, especially for safety, but ground planes (above ground) are a bit different than say ground radials. Higher RF frequencies don't need it so much for good propagation. Cell phones, small handheld transceivers, etc., don't need massive ground connections, but your body can help a little.


 
Posted : 24/04/2011 8:48 pm
Forum Jump:
  Previous Topic
Next Topic  
Share:
Forum Information
Recent Posts
Unread Posts
Tags
  • 13 Forums
  • 7,756 Topics
  • 63.6 K Posts
  • 13 Online
  • 2,249 Members
Our newest member: electronic
Latest Post: Part 15 Too Restrictive for Automakers
Forum Icons: Forum contains no unread posts Forum contains unread posts
Topic Icons: Not Replied Replied Active Hot Sticky Unapproved Solved Private Closed

Primary Sidebar

Online Members

 No online members at the moment

Recent Posts

  • RichPowers

    Ultra long range Part 15 broadcasting (to space)

    While car makers appear to be opting for the licenced s...

    By RichPowers , 12 hours ago

  • Mark

    Here's a look at why we do processing and what each function does.

    Shows for FM but applies to AM also.

    By Mark , 4 days ago

  • Mark

    RE: Early 80s Realty Radio' AM transmitters

    I don't think the audio quality would be that good on t...

    By Mark , 2 weeks ago

  • RichPowers

    RE: Early 80s Realty Radio' AM transmitters

    I was very tempted to buy them both, they were dirt che...

    By RichPowers , 2 weeks ago

  • RichPowers

    RE: Part 15 Too Restrictive for Automakers

    @mark I had to pause when you mentioned "15 minute citi...

    By RichPowers , 2 weeks ago

Recent Topics

  • Mark

    Here's a look at why we do processing and what each function does.

    By Mark 4 days ago

  • RichPowers

    Part 15 Too Restrictive for Automakers

    By RichPowers 2 weeks ago

  • RichPowers

    From Virtue to Vice - Music Morality

    By RichPowers 3 weeks ago

  • RichPowers

    affordable DAC Impressive Versatility “audiophile quality” Promising Big performance at small price

    By RichPowers 3 weeks ago

  • RichPowers

    New Canadian Resident?

    By RichPowers 3 weeks ago

Topic Tags

  • Carl Blare3
  • KDX RADIO3
  • WINDOZE3
  • Transmitter2
  • Radio Phvern2
  • station upgrade2
  • archive.org2
  • playlist2
  • Zara Radio2
  • #SW2101
View all tags (75)

Copyright © 2026 · Part15.org · Log in

‹›×

    ‹›×