Japan's All-Nippon Airways has discovered that by menacing-looking eyes painted on the engine intakes of its jet aircraft frighten away birds and prevent collisions.

The magazine International Wildlife reports that in a controlled experiment, the Japanese domestic airline painted eyes on 26 of its Boeing 747's and 767's, and left the rest of its fleet without the bogus eyes.

At the end of the one-year test period, an average of only one bird had hit each of the engines adorned with painted eyes. Each unpainted engine, however, had been struck by an average of nine birds.

All-Nippon Airways estimates that the reduction in bird strikes during the testing period reduced the damage to its aircraft from $910,000 to $720,000. Consequently, All-Nippon plans to paint eyes on all its large-body aircraft."

Bird strikes happen all the time.  Flight 1549 that landed in the Hudson River a few years ago lost power in both engines due to bird strikes. Something as simple and cheap as painting eyeballs on the planes can reduce that.  Even if, over ten years, doing so saved ONE plane from going down wouldn't it be worth the paint? But of course we wouldn't consider anything THAT simple and effective.

It's kind of like all the laws and hubub surrounding texting and driving.  Everyone likes to hate texters because it's so visable.  Now, granted, anyone who texts and drives is an idiot.  However, speeding and driving drunk and still the number 1 & 2 causes of death on the highways (in the USA anyway). They're actually tied at about 25% each, making up 50% of deaths on the roads. Distracted driving is a tossup between 3rd and 4th, and the NUMBER ONE cause of distracted driving is DAYDREAMING!  Several recent studies have shown, simply not thinking about what you're doing, day dreaming, etc is the number one distraction by a large margin. Texting/cell phone use comes in somewhere around 8th (that's 8th in the list of distractions, making it about 10th or 12th on overall cause, and being a very tiny percent). But we enact laws for texters simply because it's a very visable form of distraction.  It's popular with the people so it's popular with politicians, and to hell with any facts and figures. The other distractions that top texting are things outside of the car (reading signs, pretty girls, advertising, pedestrians, etc). Plus operating things inside the car, distractions from passengers, working the climate control or radio/sound system, etc. All these things come in ahead of texting.  Yet, it's texting we run a million PSA's for, and run ad campaigne, etc. Clearly the goal isn't to make the roads safer, but to make it appear that they are making the roads safer with what is popular to complain about rather than what the actual issues are. 

Same thing with the UAS registrations. 

Silly.

 

TIB