• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Part15

Part15

License Free, legal, low-power radio broadcasting

  • About Us
  • Forums
  • Resources
  • Members
  • Contact Us
  • Log In
Forums
Main Category
temp
Alternative Tuning ...
 
Notifications
Clear all

Alternative Tuning Method for TH ATU

 
temp
Last Post by Anonymous 13 years ago
4 Posts
2 Users
0 Reactions
638 Views
RSS
 birn
(@birn)
Posts: 2
Active Member Registered
Topic starter
 

Regarding the Talking House V5, can you tune the 102 whip without using the ATU? I have several tuners for ham radio and I believe once you lock in a frequency, the ATU is a mute point? Or can someone advise on a different, outside antenna to use? i think the ATU is overpriced to use just once....I wont be bouncing frequencies. Any help would be appreciated.


 
Posted : 03/01/2014 3:31 am
 Anonymous
(@Anonymous)
Posts: 0
 

When the external ATU connection is selected, the internal automatic tuner is bypassed so in that regard, the internal tuner is a moot point.

When using the external ATU connection, you can use a tuner other than the ATU with the 102 inch whip.  The correct input impedance and the ability to match the 102 inch whip at the desired frequency would be necessary.

The ATU is a passive tuner which uses one of two slug tuned coils for the upper or lower portion of the band.  A slide switch selects which coil is to be used.  The input to the ATU is a toroid transformer.

Of course, the Talking House system is certified for use with their ATU.  Most likely, using an alternate tuner would not satisfy that requirement.

 

 


 
Posted : 03/01/2014 6:46 am
 Anonymous
(@Anonymous)
Posts: 0
 

Mram, thanks...you have a suggestion on what antenna to use with the TH, other than the ATU? Since the transmiter is certified, can I use other antennas? And the easiest method for  impedance and matching freq?


 
Posted : 03/01/2014 7:07 am
 Anonymous
(@Anonymous)
Posts: 0
 

I assume when you say "use other antennas" you are referring to the ATU, not the attached whip.

The Talking House system is certified for Part 15.219 use with the Talking House ATU.  To use an external antenna tuner other than the Talking House ATU would not satisfiy the requirement of the certification and thus not satisfy the Part 15.219 rule.

I am aware of one instance where someone tested a different external antenna/tuner and the result was less than desireable compared to the ATU.  I do not have all the details of the experiment so your own result could be different.

You could try one of the base loaded, 3 meter antennas described on various websites.  Tuning would be trial and error, adjusting the coil to resonate the antenna.  Matching impedance could be accomplished by adjusting the coax connection tap point from the coil bottom up.  The process requires patience as tuning and impedance matching would most likely interact.

Everyone leans on using FCC certified systems to obtain that warm, fuzzzy feeling of security.  But, it is legal to use a non-certified sytem so long as it satisfies the rules.  Certification is required for the mass production and selling of transmitters, not the operation of such.  It just so happens that the Talking House system is one which is certified for Part15.219 use with a separation between the transmitter and antenna using their ATU.

To separate the Talking House transmitter from an antenna/tuner other than the Talking House ATU would not satisfy the Part 15.219 3 meter rule as the Talking House certification which allows the separation requires using the ATU.  Yes, we all feel that is silly but that's the way it works.

However, if you could prove the field strength of your system meets Part 15.209 it would be legal regardless.

Short answers are few and far in between.


 
Posted : 05/01/2014 6:07 pm
Forum Jump:
  Previous Topic
Next Topic  
Share:
Forum Information
Recent Posts
Unread Posts
Tags
  • 13 Forums
  • 7,756 Topics
  • 63.6 K Posts
  • 17 Online
  • 2,249 Members
Our newest member: electronic
Latest Post: Part 15 Too Restrictive for Automakers
Forum Icons: Forum contains no unread posts Forum contains unread posts
Topic Icons: Not Replied Replied Active Hot Sticky Unapproved Solved Private Closed

Primary Sidebar

Online Members

 No online members at the moment

Recent Posts

  • RichPowers

    Ultra long range Part 15 broadcasting (to space)

    While car makers appear to be opting for the licenced s...

    By RichPowers , 22 hours ago

  • Mark

    Here's a look at why we do processing and what each function does.

    Shows for FM but applies to AM also.

    By Mark , 5 days ago

  • Mark

    RE: Early 80s Realty Radio' AM transmitters

    I don't think the audio quality would be that good on t...

    By Mark , 2 weeks ago

  • RichPowers

    RE: Early 80s Realty Radio' AM transmitters

    I was very tempted to buy them both, they were dirt che...

    By RichPowers , 2 weeks ago

  • RichPowers

    RE: Part 15 Too Restrictive for Automakers

    @mark I had to pause when you mentioned "15 minute citi...

    By RichPowers , 2 weeks ago

Recent Topics

  • Mark

    Here's a look at why we do processing and what each function does.

    By Mark 5 days ago

  • RichPowers

    Part 15 Too Restrictive for Automakers

    By RichPowers 2 weeks ago

  • RichPowers

    From Virtue to Vice - Music Morality

    By RichPowers 3 weeks ago

  • RichPowers

    affordable DAC Impressive Versatility “audiophile quality” Promising Big performance at small price

    By RichPowers 3 weeks ago

  • RichPowers

    New Canadian Resident?

    By RichPowers 3 weeks ago

Topic Tags

  • Carl Blare3
  • KDX RADIO3
  • WINDOZE3
  • Transmitter2
  • Radio Phvern2
  • station upgrade2
  • archive.org2
  • playlist2
  • Zara Radio2
  • #SW2101
View all tags (75)

Copyright © 2026 · Part15.org · Log in

‹›×

    ‹›×