• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Part15

Part15

License Free, legal, low-power radio broadcasting

  • About Us
  • Forums
  • Resources
  • Members
  • Contact Us
  • Log In
Forums
Main Category
temp
A DIY Isotron Clone
 
Notifications
Clear all

A DIY Isotron Clone

 
temp
Last Post by Anonymous 10 years ago
8 Posts
2 Users
0 Reactions
676 Views
RSS
 wdcx
(@wdcx)
Posts: 444
Noble Member Registered
Topic starter
 

Much less expensive to build then to buy.  Save $200.

http://www.pcs-electronics.com/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=1092


 
Posted : 06/07/2016 9:42 am
 Anonymous
(@Anonymous)
Posts: 0
 

I always wanted to try a Part 15 transmitter

with an Isotron.  About 30 years ago a guy I

know put TOO MUCH transmitter power through

an Isotron and it caught fire and melted.  

That was a dumb thing to do.  I know they work

great it you stay within the rated power figure,

whatever that is.  And it was a long time ago.

I read that link.  The guy tested the Isotron on

the AM BCB, and it worked - but I wish he had

been using Part 15 power levels.  That would 

have been helpful.

And it seems as if the Isotron can be a good

receiving antenna too.  It seems to cut down

on noise in some situations.  Considering its

design, I wonder if it acts like a balanced "magnetic"

receiving loop?

Very Best Wishes,

Brooce, Still Experimenting,

West Hartford, CT  


 
Posted : 08/07/2016 6:02 pm
 Anonymous
(@Anonymous)
Posts: 0
 

I always wanted to try a Part 15 transmitter

with an Isotron.  About 30 years ago a guy I

know put TOO MUCH transmitter power through

an Isotron and it caught fire and melted.  

That was a dumb thing to do.  I know they work

great it you stay within the rated power figure,

whatever that is.  And it was a long time ago.

I read that link.  The guy tested the Isotron on

the AM BCB, and it worked - but I wish he had

been using Part 15 power levels.  That would 

have been helpful.

And it seems as if the Isotron can be a good

receiving antenna too.  It seems to cut down

on noise in some situations.  Considering its

design, I wonder if it acts like a balanced "magnetic"

receiving loop?

Very Best Wishes,

Brooce, Still Experimenting,

West Hartford, CT  


 
Posted : 08/07/2016 6:02 pm
 Anonymous
(@Anonymous)
Posts: 0
 

Sorry


 
Posted : 08/07/2016 6:04 pm
 Anonymous
(@Anonymous)
Posts: 0
 

Can someone tell me how antenna bandwidth affects audio response?  I see vague references to how the Q of the coil affects sound, but no explanation of it.  I have a Harris C-Quam exciter and was looking at the Isotron to use with it at part 15 power settings, but have seen comments about it being a narrowband antenna.  Does this mean it can't be "eq'ed out" for response up to 10 khz?  Thanks.  


 
Posted : 31/07/2016 6:48 am
 Anonymous
(@Anonymous)
Posts: 0
 

A carrier which is amplitude modulated carries the audio information in the sidebands, one above and one below the carrier frequency.  The total bandwidth of the signal is twice the highest audio frequency in the modulating signal.  For proper operation the antenna must radiate the signal including the sidebands.

A coil loaded antenna acts as a band pass filter which radiates energy within the band pass frequency range.  A hi Q antenna has a narrower bandwidth than a low Q antenna.  If the Q is high enough  to reduce the signal at the edges of the sidebands then the effect is that the higher audio frequency information is lost and the audio will lack high frequencies at the receiver.

I don't know about the Isotron so can't predict if this effect is present but now you have some theory.

Neil

 


 
Posted : 31/07/2016 7:22 pm
 Anonymous
(@Anonymous)
Posts: 0
 

i see that guy's 522khz version of the antenna only has a wire going up the length of the pipe. i would wrap that part in aluminum sheet flashing to get better bandwidth

 


 
Posted : 10/08/2016 4:41 pm
 Anonymous
(@Anonymous)
Posts: 0
 

That's a good explanation of how antenna bandwidth affects the sound quality, Radio8z. Who could imagine a coil designed for RF frequencies could have a narrow enough bandwidth that it can effect the audio response itself.

That's probably one of the compromises made in those transmitters with loading coils wrapped on a toroid core. They peak up the signal well enough, but the Q isn't quite as high, so it doesn't affect the audio, and the tuning wouldn't be as critical.


 
Posted : 10/08/2016 9:46 pm
Forum Jump:
  Previous Topic
Next Topic  
Share:
Forum Information
Recent Posts
Unread Posts
Tags
  • 13 Forums
  • 7,756 Topics
  • 63.6 K Posts
  • 13 Online
  • 2,249 Members
Our newest member: electronic
Latest Post: Part 15 Too Restrictive for Automakers
Forum Icons: Forum contains no unread posts Forum contains unread posts
Topic Icons: Not Replied Replied Active Hot Sticky Unapproved Solved Private Closed

Primary Sidebar

Online Members

 No online members at the moment

Recent Posts

  • RichPowers

    Ultra long range Part 15 broadcasting (to space)

    While car makers appear to be opting for the licenced s...

    By RichPowers , 17 hours ago

  • Mark

    Here's a look at why we do processing and what each function does.

    Shows for FM but applies to AM also.

    By Mark , 4 days ago

  • Mark

    RE: Early 80s Realty Radio' AM transmitters

    I don't think the audio quality would be that good on t...

    By Mark , 2 weeks ago

  • RichPowers

    RE: Early 80s Realty Radio' AM transmitters

    I was very tempted to buy them both, they were dirt che...

    By RichPowers , 2 weeks ago

  • RichPowers

    RE: Part 15 Too Restrictive for Automakers

    @mark I had to pause when you mentioned "15 minute citi...

    By RichPowers , 2 weeks ago

Recent Topics

  • Mark

    Here's a look at why we do processing and what each function does.

    By Mark 4 days ago

  • RichPowers

    Part 15 Too Restrictive for Automakers

    By RichPowers 2 weeks ago

  • RichPowers

    From Virtue to Vice - Music Morality

    By RichPowers 3 weeks ago

  • RichPowers

    affordable DAC Impressive Versatility “audiophile quality” Promising Big performance at small price

    By RichPowers 3 weeks ago

  • RichPowers

    New Canadian Resident?

    By RichPowers 3 weeks ago

Topic Tags

  • Carl Blare3
  • KDX RADIO3
  • WINDOZE3
  • Transmitter2
  • Radio Phvern2
  • station upgrade2
  • archive.org2
  • playlist2
  • Zara Radio2
  • #SW2101
View all tags (75)

Copyright © 2026 · Part15.org · Log in

‹›×

    ‹›×