• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Part15

Part15

License Free, legal, low-power radio broadcasting

  • About Us
  • Forums
  • Resources
  • Members
  • Contact Us
  • Log In
Forums
Main Category
Regulations / Law
Why it's not a 200m...
 
Notifications
Clear all

Why it's not a 200mw input

 
Regulations / Law
Last Post by RichPowers 5 months ago
1 Posts
1 Users
1 Reactions
256 Views
RSS
RichPowers
 RichPowers
(@richpowers)
Posts: 3403
Illustrious Member Registered
Topic starter
 

I've talked about it before, back in 1956 when the alternate rule was created (15.219) The FCC decided it was going to be a 200mw input and a 10ft antenna, but at the last moment before it was enacted they cut  the limit in half making it a 100mw input limit. What had prompted the FCC to do that? - the answer is revealed in a 1964 trial against a manufacturer over their part 15 AM transmitter years prior - the issue was that it did not perform as advertised, it didn't perform very well at all and consumers were pissed about it.

But the point here is that if that manufactured part 15 transmitter in the 1950s had actually worked as well as advertised, then no investigation would have ever took place and 15.219 today would be 200mw input and 3 meter antenna.

Kind of ironic actually.

https://www.google.com/books/edition/Western_Radio_Corporation_V_Federal_Trad/JR9APKUUTOIC?hl=en

 

17713979233464567071378325117963

 
Posted : 17/02/2026 11:21 pm
1
Forum Jump:
  Previous Topic
Next Topic  
Share:
Forum Information
Recent Posts
Unread Posts
Tags
  • 13 Forums
  • 7,756 Topics
  • 63.6 K Posts
  • 24 Online
  • 2,249 Members
Our newest member: electronic
Latest Post: Here's a look at why we do processing and what each function does.
Forum Icons: Forum contains no unread posts Forum contains unread posts
Topic Icons: Not Replied Replied Active Hot Sticky Unapproved Solved Private Closed

Primary Sidebar

Online Members

 No online members at the moment

Recent Posts

  • Mark

    Here's a look at why we do processing and what each function does.

    Shows for FM but applies to AM also.

    By Mark , 2 days ago

  • Mark

    RE: Early 80s Realty Radio' AM transmitters

    I don't think the audio quality would be that good on t...

    By Mark , 2 weeks ago

  • RichPowers

    RE: Early 80s Realty Radio' AM transmitters

    I was very tempted to buy them both, they were dirt che...

    By RichPowers , 2 weeks ago

  • RichPowers

    RE: Part 15 Too Restrictive for Automakers

    @mark I had to pause when you mentioned "15 minute citi...

    By RichPowers , 2 weeks ago

  • Mark

    RE: Part 15 Too Restrictive for Automakers

    Your last part.... "It all very interesting but all I...

    By Mark , 2 weeks ago

Recent Topics

  • Mark

    Here's a look at why we do processing and what each function does.

    By Mark 2 days ago

  • RichPowers

    Part 15 Too Restrictive for Automakers

    By RichPowers 2 weeks ago

  • RichPowers

    From Virtue to Vice - Music Morality

    By RichPowers 3 weeks ago

  • RichPowers

    affordable DAC Impressive Versatility “audiophile quality” Promising Big performance at small price

    By RichPowers 3 weeks ago

  • RichPowers

    New Canadian Resident?

    By RichPowers 3 weeks ago

Topic Tags

  • Carl Blare3
  • KDX RADIO3
  • WINDOZE3
  • Transmitter2
  • Radio Phvern2
  • station upgrade2
  • archive.org2
  • playlist2
  • Zara Radio2
  • #SW2101
View all tags (75)

Copyright © 2026 · Part15.org · Log in

‹›×

    ‹›×