• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Part15

Part15

License Free, legal, low-power radio broadcasting

  • About Us
  • Forums
  • Resources
  • Members
  • Contact Us
  • Log In
Forums
Main Category
General Radio Discu...
Exempted from FCC P...
 
Notifications
Clear all

Exempted from FCC Part 15

 
General Radio Discussion
Last Post by RichPowers 2 years ago
7 Posts
3 Users
0 Reactions
768 Views
RSS
RichPowers
 RichPowers
(@richpowers)
Posts: 3358
Famed Member Registered
Topic starter
 

These are primarily all appliance items. All we need to do is be classified as an appliance somehow... https://www.compliancegate.com/fcc-part-15-product-list/#Products_Exempted_from_FCC_Part_15

Products Exempted from FCC Part 15

FCC Part 15 covers electronic products that are classified as an intentional or unintentional radiator. It applies to most consumer electronics and electrical equipment with a CPU operating at 9kHz or higher frequency. That said, some electronic products are exempt. Here are some exemptions for your reference:

  • Refrigerators
  • Stoves
  • Washing machines
  • Water heaters
  • Rug cleaners
  • Dishwashers
  • Air conditioners
  • Fan heaters

 
Posted : 16/11/2024 6:04 am
RichPowers
 RichPowers
(@richpowers)
Posts: 3358
Famed Member Registered
Topic starter
 

Pondering on it, it's kind of funny. What made those particular 8 items be granted FCC approval to cause as much interference as you want.  And why specifically rug cleaners of all things?

It's funny.

 


 
Posted : 18/11/2024 3:20 pm
 Carl Blare
(@carl-blare)
Posts: 2621
Famed Member Registered
 

@richpowers

And why specifically rug cleaners of all things?

With a new president coming to the Oval Office they are running the heck out of the rug cleaning machines and need to ward off FCC noise complaints.


 
Posted : 18/11/2024 4:03 pm
Mark
 Mark
(@mark)
Posts: 2302
Member Moderator
 

May be that those in the list don't cause adverse enough interference to be concerned about. I have never heard AM radio noise from any of those things.
The only thing on that list that *may* cause some close up interference is an air conditioner but I have held a radio right beside the outside air conditioner and no noise was heard on the radio. A heater, refrigerator, stove do not cause interference.


 
Posted : 18/11/2024 4:42 pm
RichPowers
 RichPowers
(@richpowers)
Posts: 3358
Famed Member Registered
Topic starter
 

@mark Well, see that just makes the whole thing odder! For what reason where such devices ruled to be exempt from any part 15 restrictions in the first place -  expecially, as you say, they dont even cause interference.

The FCC actually took action to exempt them. I'm sure there's a reasonable purpose behind it, but at face value it's peculiar. 

 


 
Posted : 18/11/2024 10:46 pm
Mark
 Mark
(@mark)
Posts: 2302
Member Moderator
 

@richpowers I would think that the interference the FCC would be more concerned with is RF interference. Maybe there is some other kind of interference that these things listed could cause...don't know, just thinking, maybe like magnetic fields, something along those lines.
But rug cleaners??


 
Posted : 19/11/2024 11:20 am
RichPowers
 RichPowers
(@richpowers)
Posts: 3358
Famed Member Registered
Topic starter
 

@mark Don't know, but don't think so. It doesn't add up (at least not to me). I didn't even know automobiles were exempt from Part 15 regulations until Telsa decided to leave AM radio out. Maybe the reasoning is all indirectly interconnected with rug cleaners and the like somehow...

I haven't grasped what makes certain devices such as cars and the appliances previously listed ad specifically exempt. Its odd.

Kind of reminds me of a entirely different FCC oddity.. I always wondered what ever happened to influence the FCC to find it neccessary to officially explain (in regard to part 15 tunnel radio systems) that "a oil tanker is not a tunnel", only something totally surrounded by earth except for the openings were tunnels.. I know it must have been related to "Tunnel Systems USA" who had a franchise going on at the time.. All I can figure is that someone, somewhere was broadcasting from inside a oil tank to avoid the regular part 15 emission limits (tunnel radio is to an extent exempt from part 15 too)


 
Posted : 19/11/2024 11:59 am
Forum Jump:
  Previous Topic
Next Topic  
Share:
Forum Information
Recent Posts
Unread Posts
Tags
  • 13 Forums
  • 7,740 Topics
  • 63.5 K Posts
  • 85 Online
  • 2,249 Members
Our newest member: electronic
Latest Post: 7 Beatles Misheard Lyrics
Forum Icons: Forum contains no unread posts Forum contains unread posts
Topic Icons: Not Replied Replied Active Hot Sticky Unapproved Solved Private Closed

Primary Sidebar

Online Members

 No online members at the moment

Recent Posts

  • Mark

    RE: 7 Beatles Misheard Lyrics

    Many songs have I heard something other than the actual...

    By Mark , 2 days ago

  • Mark

    RE: 7 Beatles Misheard Lyrics

    Have you heard this?

    By Mark , 2 days ago

  • RichPowers

    Unique AM Transmitter

    Here one I've not seen before. they're $69.50 on eBay, ...

    By RichPowers , 2 days ago

  • RichPowers

    7 Beatles Misheard Lyrics

    As far as I'm concerned this article is ridiculous, I d...

    By RichPowers , 2 days ago

  • Mark

    RE: Newly Discovered Robert Johnson in Stunning Clarity

    @richpowers Sounds good.

    By Mark , 3 days ago

Recent Topics

  • RichPowers

    Unique AM Transmitter

    By RichPowers 2 days ago

  • RichPowers

    7 Beatles Misheard Lyrics

    By RichPowers 2 days ago

  • RichPowers

    Public Domain Feature Films about Radio

    By RichPowers 3 days ago

  • RichPowers

    Speed Limit 17.3mph

    By RichPowers 5 days ago

  • ArtisanRadio

    Artisan Radio Pivots Again

    By ArtisanRadio 5 days ago

Topic Tags

  • Carl Blare3
  • KDX RADIO3
  • WINDOZE3
  • Transmitter2
  • Radio Phvern2
  • station upgrade2
  • archive.org2
  • playlist2
  • Zara Radio2
  • Carrier Current1
View all tags (74)

Copyright © 2026 · Part15.org · Log in

‹›×

    ‹›×