• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Part15

Part15

License Free, legal, low-power radio broadcasting

  • About Us
  • Forums
  • Resources
  • Members
  • Contact Us
  • Log In
Forums
Main Category
General Radio Discu...
AM Radio History
 
Notifications
Clear all

AM Radio History

 
General Radio Discussion
Last Post by Rugster 2 years ago
8 Posts
4 Users
0 Reactions
1,124 Views
RSS
 Carl Blare
(@carl-blare)
Posts: 2621
Famed Member Registered
Topic starter
 

@richardpowers  This probably goes to Rich Powers, but anyone is welcome to answer...  As I know it the original AM band ended at 1500kHz. On what date was the band extended to 1600kHz? On what date was the X-Band added, up to 1700kHz?


 
Posted : 28/11/2024 8:05 am
RichPowers
 RichPowers
(@richpowers)
Posts: 3404
Illustrious Member Registered
 

Well.. I hesitate to answer off the top of my head, but I think they expanded to 550 in 1938 coinciding with the creation of part 15. I know Halstead was broadcasting 550 from the George Washington bridge in 1940 and some articles said to tune your radio "to the top of the dial" to receive it. 

But somehow that doesnt sound right. Seems it expanded to 1500 later in the 1940s and 1600 in the 1950s, then to 1700 about 20 years ago...

I shouldn't even be trying to answer without looking.. I'm just not certain know off the top my head and dont feel like digging out the facts at the moment.

In fact, just ignore this answer altogether..

 


 
Posted : 28/11/2024 8:56 am
Mark
 Mark
(@mark)
Posts: 2330
Member Moderator
 

This should answer Carl's question:
http://earlyradiohistory.us/buildbcb.htm
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AM_expanded_band


This post was modified 2 years ago by Mark
 
Posted : 28/11/2024 9:30 am
RichPowers
 RichPowers
(@richpowers)
Posts: 3404
Illustrious Member Registered
 

@mark Wow.. that's some in depth history that guy wrote.. but it's not going answer any of Carl's questions.


 
Posted : 28/11/2024 9:41 am
RichPowers
 RichPowers
(@richpowers)
Posts: 3404
Illustrious Member Registered
 

I knew something didnt sound right in my response, the correct answer appears to be found at https://www.oldradio.com/current/bc_am.htm

The Growth of the Standard Broadcast Band

  • The Standard Broadcast Band began in 1921 with just one frequency (833 kHz).
  • In December 1921, 619 kHz was added for Weather and Market reports.
  • In September 1922, 750 kHz was added as a new "Entertainment" frequency.
  • On May 15, 1923, the Standard Broadcast Band was expanded to 550-1360 kHz using 10 kHz steps.
  • In April 1925, this was further expanded to 550-1500 kHz.
  • November 11, 1928 saw the first big "realignment" as the FRC shifted many stations, and deleted others, in an attempt to reduce interference.
  • On March 29, 1941, the band was extended to 550-1600 kHz. On this date, the NARBA frequency shift changed many stations spot on the dial.
  • In the early 1950s, the band was extended to 540-1600 kHz. The first 540 was
               WGTH, Richmond, VA.  A CP was granted for 540 on 12/17/53, with a License to cover on 5/21/54.
  • In mid-1961, most Class IV stations were permitted to increase power from 250 Watts to 1/.25 kW.
  • In 1983, most Class IV stations were permitted to increase power from 1/.25 kW to 1 kW.
  • In 1995, the FCC again extended the Standard Broadcast Band to 540-1700 kHz. 
           

 

But something there still doesn't sound right.... I dont know what's bothering me


This post was modified 2 years ago by RichPowers
 
Posted : 28/11/2024 9:50 am
Mark
 Mark
(@mark)
Posts: 2330
Member Moderator
 

@richpowers Maybe the 50kW stations are not mentioned?
1050 CHUM in Toronto was in it's heyday a 50,000 watt station along with all the big boomers at night like WABC, WLS, WOWO, and many more. This was in the 60s, 70s.


This post was modified 2 years ago 2 times by Mark
 
Posted : 28/11/2024 10:08 am
RichPowers
 RichPowers
(@richpowers)
Posts: 3404
Illustrious Member Registered
 

@mark No, that's not what's bugging me.. I dont know, I'm probably just got some facts mixed in my head. But I not ever researched the history of the AM band, but naturally it comes into play when researching part 15. I do know in 1938 the FCC was talking about expanding the AM band -- but obviously the top of the band was not 550 then like I said. 

I don't know, the topic is really outside my territory.


 
Posted : 28/11/2024 10:32 am
Rugster
 Rugster
(@rugster)
Posts: 253
Reputable Member Registered
 

In the Wikipedia article on the subject, even Part 15'ers get a mention, in a indirect sort of a way. In the section for United States, directly under the sub-heading "Later Activities" - 

"A 2006 accounting by Radio World reported that, out of 4,758 licensed U.S. AM stations, 56 were now operating on the expanded band.[33] The expanded band frequencies have also become popular for use by hobbyist microbroadcasting transmissions (which don't require licenses) due to the relatively limited number of broadcasting stations compared to the more congested standard/legacy AM band."

They didn't mention that a big part of why we like the higher frequencies is due to the slightly higher efficiency of our very short antennas at the top part of the band.

 

 


This post was modified 2 years ago 5 times by Rugster
 
Posted : 28/11/2024 11:27 am
Forum Jump:
  Previous Topic
Next Topic  
Share:
Forum Information
Recent Posts
Unread Posts
Tags
  • 13 Forums
  • 7,756 Topics
  • 63.6 K Posts
  • 10 Online
  • 2,249 Members
Our newest member: electronic
Latest Post: Part 15 Too Restrictive for Automakers
Forum Icons: Forum contains no unread posts Forum contains unread posts
Topic Icons: Not Replied Replied Active Hot Sticky Unapproved Solved Private Closed

Primary Sidebar

Online Members

 No online members at the moment

Recent Posts

  • RichPowers

    Ultra long range Part 15 broadcasting (to space)

    While car makers appear to be opting for the licenced s...

    By RichPowers , 1 day ago

  • Mark

    Here's a look at why we do processing and what each function does.

    Shows for FM but applies to AM also.

    By Mark , 5 days ago

  • Mark

    RE: Early 80s Realty Radio' AM transmitters

    I don't think the audio quality would be that good on t...

    By Mark , 2 weeks ago

  • RichPowers

    RE: Early 80s Realty Radio' AM transmitters

    I was very tempted to buy them both, they were dirt che...

    By RichPowers , 2 weeks ago

  • RichPowers

    RE: Part 15 Too Restrictive for Automakers

    @mark I had to pause when you mentioned "15 minute citi...

    By RichPowers , 2 weeks ago

Recent Topics

  • Mark

    Here's a look at why we do processing and what each function does.

    By Mark 5 days ago

  • RichPowers

    Part 15 Too Restrictive for Automakers

    By RichPowers 2 weeks ago

  • RichPowers

    From Virtue to Vice - Music Morality

    By RichPowers 3 weeks ago

  • RichPowers

    affordable DAC Impressive Versatility “audiophile quality” Promising Big performance at small price

    By RichPowers 3 weeks ago

  • RichPowers

    New Canadian Resident?

    By RichPowers 3 weeks ago

Topic Tags

  • Carl Blare3
  • KDX RADIO3
  • WINDOZE3
  • Transmitter2
  • Radio Phvern2
  • station upgrade2
  • archive.org2
  • playlist2
  • Zara Radio2
  • #SW2101
View all tags (75)

Copyright © 2026 · Part15.org · Log in

‹›×

    ‹›×