• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Part15

Part15

License Free, legal, low-power radio broadcasting

  • About Us
  • Forums
  • Resources
  • Members
  • Contact Us
  • Log In
Forums
Main Category
General Radio Discu...
A QUESTION ABOUT AN...
 
Notifications
Clear all

A QUESTION ABOUT ANTENNAS

 
General Radio Discussion
Last Post by Rich 4 years ago
4 Posts
2 Users
0 Reactions
2,770 Views
RSS
Mark
 Mark
(@mark)
Posts: 2330
Member Moderator
Topic starter
 

From Carl Blare's blog I thought may get some discussion here....

Is there a relationship between a wire cut to wavelength and a length of wire wound on a loop antenna to reach resonance?

I think yes as the end result is common to both methods.
Any other ideas?


 
Posted : 09/03/2022 9:16 am
 Rich
(@rich)
Posts: 207
Reputable Member Registered
 

RE: Is there a relationship between a wire cut to wavelength and a length of wire wound on a loop antenna to reach resonance?

_____________

There is a relationship as far as the reactive terms of their feedpoint terminal impedance both approaching "resonance" (jX = 0) at some given lengths of straight or coiled transmit antenna conductors, on a given frequency.

However the most important facts in the performance of a transmit antenna depend on its radiation resistance compared to its system losses, which is based on its dimensions, construction, installation, and its "aperture" exposed to free space.

As an example, a legal, 3-m-tall, Part 15 AM vertical monopole can be resonated at ~1600 kHz, but its radiation EFFICIENCY can be less than 1%.

If a vertical monopole having a physical height of 1/4-wavelength was used in that same situation, its naturally resonant (jX =0) length would have a radiation resistance of ~37 Ω, and its radiation efficiency can be 90% or better.


 
Posted : 09/03/2022 4:21 pm
Mark
 Mark
(@mark)
Posts: 2330
Member Moderator
Topic starter
 

From Carl's blog on this topic he was really asking, as it was misunderstood, and he cleared it up as to what the real question is.
Carl asked "I was looking for a comparison between the lengths of wire to reach resonance. For example, if the long-wire approach was 100' long, then how long would the wire for the loop version be? I still have no idea."

The answer, or more importantly my opinion, A loop or coil depends on the number of windings and the diameter of the loop to get resonance at a given frequency in the MW band. If you look at the loop antennas used in tube radios made in the 20s 30s 40s 50s the diameter was about 4 to 6 inches usually oval shaped and about as I remember maybe 20 to 25 windings of wire which if unstretched would be no where near the length a single length of wire would have to be to have resonance at a frequency in the MW band. Going by the wave length.
I am looking now at my Grundig tunable AM loop antenna and the diameter is 9" and the number of turns of wire is 28 turns. If I unstretched the wire it would be nowhere near the length of wire needed for resonance which would be over half a km at 530klz and at 1700klz would be 176 meters. The length of wire I'd have is 56 ft if I unravelled the wire from my tunable loop which is 17 meters roughly.
But maybe Rich can weigh in on this.


 
Posted : 18/03/2022 9:02 am
 Rich
(@rich)
Posts: 207
Reputable Member Registered
 

RE:  But maybe Rich can weigh in on this.

As usual in engineering matters, accurate answers to apparently simple questions can require a deep understanding of the Physics involved.

Correctly understanding these topics requires the careful study of appropriate antenna engineering textbooks, such as ANTENNAS For All Applications 3rd Edition (McGraw-Hill), by John D. Kraus.

One point that will emerge from doing so: there is much more involved in the performance of a multi-turn loop antenna used on a given frequency/band than the number of loops it contains.

 

 


 
Posted : 18/03/2022 2:28 pm
Forum Jump:
  Previous Topic
Next Topic  
Share:
Forum Information
Recent Posts
Unread Posts
Tags
  • 13 Forums
  • 7,756 Topics
  • 63.6 K Posts
  • 25 Online
  • 2,249 Members
Our newest member: electronic
Latest Post: Here's a look at why we do processing and what each function does.
Forum Icons: Forum contains no unread posts Forum contains unread posts
Topic Icons: Not Replied Replied Active Hot Sticky Unapproved Solved Private Closed

Primary Sidebar

Online Members

 No online members at the moment

Recent Posts

  • Mark

    Here's a look at why we do processing and what each function does.

    Shows for FM but applies to AM also.

    By Mark , 2 days ago

  • Mark

    RE: Early 80s Realty Radio' AM transmitters

    I don't think the audio quality would be that good on t...

    By Mark , 2 weeks ago

  • RichPowers

    RE: Early 80s Realty Radio' AM transmitters

    I was very tempted to buy them both, they were dirt che...

    By RichPowers , 2 weeks ago

  • RichPowers

    RE: Part 15 Too Restrictive for Automakers

    @mark I had to pause when you mentioned "15 minute citi...

    By RichPowers , 2 weeks ago

  • Mark

    RE: Part 15 Too Restrictive for Automakers

    Your last part.... "It all very interesting but all I...

    By Mark , 2 weeks ago

Recent Topics

  • Mark

    Here's a look at why we do processing and what each function does.

    By Mark 2 days ago

  • RichPowers

    Part 15 Too Restrictive for Automakers

    By RichPowers 2 weeks ago

  • RichPowers

    From Virtue to Vice - Music Morality

    By RichPowers 3 weeks ago

  • RichPowers

    affordable DAC Impressive Versatility “audiophile quality” Promising Big performance at small price

    By RichPowers 3 weeks ago

  • RichPowers

    New Canadian Resident?

    By RichPowers 3 weeks ago

Topic Tags

  • Carl Blare3
  • KDX RADIO3
  • WINDOZE3
  • Transmitter2
  • Radio Phvern2
  • station upgrade2
  • archive.org2
  • playlist2
  • Zara Radio2
  • #SW2101
View all tags (75)

Copyright © 2026 · Part15.org · Log in

‹›×

    ‹›×