• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Part15

Part15

License Free, legal, low-power radio broadcasting

  • About Us
  • Forums
  • Resources
  • Members
  • Contact Us
  • Log In
Forums
Main Category
Everything Else
When the FCC became...
 
Notifications
Clear all

When the FCC became an online presence

 
Everything Else
Last Post by RichPowers 1 year ago
1 Posts
1 Users
0 Reactions
489 Views
RSS
RichPowers
 RichPowers
(@richpowers)
Posts: 3404
Illustrious Member Registered
Topic starter
 

There were no government agencies with an online presence until after 1994 (the White House was the first). it was around 1995 when I had began building vacation rental websites (it was good money back then, most people didn't even have computers, much less internet, but everyone felt their businesses just had to be online anyway!

17514875285376034332240830510556

Anyway, I was just browsing around the Archive of the FCC which appears to have gone online in 1996 or 1997 and I found it kind of interesting.. https://web.archive.org/web/19970609215206/https://www.fcc.gov/

I was curious when the FCC first put up the notorious "200ft page" that gives us so much grief specified as "(still in effect)", which is  blatantly wrong and quite misleading as it implies it's some kind of official rule:

https://www.fcc.gov/media/radio/low-power-radio-general-information
"..  these devices are limited to an effective service range of approximately 200 feet (61 meters).  See 47 CFR (Code of Federal Regulations) Section 15.239, and the July 24, 1991 Public Notice (still in effect).  On the AM broadcast band, these devices are limited to an effective service range of approximately 200 feet (61 meters)... "

That meaningless "still in effect" phrase didnt appear until 2016 after a FCC website redesign, prior to that (since 1996) the low power page was found here:

http://www.fcc.gov/mmb/asd/lowpwr.htm l"> https://web.archive.org/web/19970724231642/http://www.fcc.gov/mmb/asd/lowpwr.html

It's the same stuff but it never refers to it as "still in effect".

So what? 

Well nothing really, it just makes me wonder if all the controversy going on ten years ago with the what's constitutes a ground lead, and the KENC ordeal and RFry rants etc had inspired the FCC to emphasize on their website this invalid 200ft range stipulation.

What I do know is what had inspired the 1991 Public notice to begin with, it becomes very evident simply by exploring the newspaper and magazine articles of the era.

The mid thru late 1980s was the major heyday of the "talking house concept", but not just homes, also really big with banks, car lots, billboards - I'm talking the free-radiate method here (15.219), there was no less than 4 or 5 different manufactures of certified AM transmitters on the market at the time, but as the 1980s came to a close the taking house craze began to drastically falter as the internet began to become more accessible and a more effective means of communication for the realty industry.

But in 1990 we begin seeing many repurposing of those transmitters by a change of programming to now "serve the community" of the now sold subdivisions of homes. The nationwide publicity of such stations in resulted in a "massive influx" of inquires to the FCC from private individuals wishing to do something similar in their own areas - and that's what directly had prompted that hastily prepared published 1991 public notice to come into existence. Unlike all other fcc public notices this one put together by someone in the Media Department was a mess because nobody bothered to consult any FCC technicians before publishing it. 

And that's how that document containing invalid information came into existence, and it's still clung to today as a means of discouraging such community stations from cropping up.

 


 
Posted : 02/07/2025 12:19 pm
Forum Jump:
  Previous Topic
Next Topic  
Share:
Forum Information
Recent Posts
Unread Posts
Tags
  • 13 Forums
  • 7,756 Topics
  • 63.6 K Posts
  • 9 Online
  • 2,249 Members
Our newest member: electronic
Latest Post: Part 15 Too Restrictive for Automakers
Forum Icons: Forum contains no unread posts Forum contains unread posts
Topic Icons: Not Replied Replied Active Hot Sticky Unapproved Solved Private Closed

Primary Sidebar

Online Members

 No online members at the moment

Recent Posts

  • RichPowers

    Ultra long range Part 15 broadcasting (to space)

    While car makers appear to be opting for the licenced s...

    By RichPowers , 1 day ago

  • Mark

    Here's a look at why we do processing and what each function does.

    Shows for FM but applies to AM also.

    By Mark , 5 days ago

  • Mark

    RE: Early 80s Realty Radio' AM transmitters

    I don't think the audio quality would be that good on t...

    By Mark , 2 weeks ago

  • RichPowers

    RE: Early 80s Realty Radio' AM transmitters

    I was very tempted to buy them both, they were dirt che...

    By RichPowers , 2 weeks ago

  • RichPowers

    RE: Part 15 Too Restrictive for Automakers

    @mark I had to pause when you mentioned "15 minute citi...

    By RichPowers , 2 weeks ago

Recent Topics

  • Mark

    Here's a look at why we do processing and what each function does.

    By Mark 5 days ago

  • RichPowers

    Part 15 Too Restrictive for Automakers

    By RichPowers 2 weeks ago

  • RichPowers

    From Virtue to Vice - Music Morality

    By RichPowers 3 weeks ago

  • RichPowers

    affordable DAC Impressive Versatility “audiophile quality” Promising Big performance at small price

    By RichPowers 3 weeks ago

  • RichPowers

    New Canadian Resident?

    By RichPowers 3 weeks ago

Topic Tags

  • Carl Blare3
  • KDX RADIO3
  • WINDOZE3
  • Transmitter2
  • Radio Phvern2
  • station upgrade2
  • archive.org2
  • playlist2
  • Zara Radio2
  • #SW2101
View all tags (75)

Copyright © 2026 · Part15.org · Log in

‹›×

    ‹›×