• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Part15

Part15

License Free, legal, low-power radio broadcasting

  • About Us
  • Forums
  • Resources
  • Members
  • Contact Us
  • Log In
Forums
Main Category
Broadcast Equipment
Making the jump to ...
 
Notifications
Clear all

Making the jump to C-QUAM

 
Broadcast Equipment
Last Post by Rich 8 years ago
12 Posts
7 Users
0 Reactions
741 Views
RSS
 spareparts
(@spareparts)
Posts: 52
Trusted Member Registered
Topic starter
 

One of the visitors to the museum surprised the heck out of us by funding the purchase of one of Sean's C-QUAM transmitters from eBAY.

So with as little fanfare as possible, CDL will be going stereo on 980 KHz.

BTW, if you are wondering why the lower TX frequency, our other LPAM transmitter in the radio museum is on 1080 KHz.


 
Posted : 05/09/2018 9:52 am
 Thelegacy
(@thelegacy)
Posts: 300
Reputable Member Registered
 

Best decision you have ever made. You're going to love the Sean Cuthbert transmitter. What type of antenna are you planning on using? I'm not sure your range is going to be all that good down there on the lower frequencies like that. You never know though let us know how it comes out.


 
Posted : 06/09/2018 12:40 pm
 spareparts
(@spareparts)
Posts: 52
Trusted Member Registered
Topic starter
 

re the antenna, not sure at this point.   There's a Marine HF antenna floating around (Shakespeare 390-1)  we can use, however it's 23 feet long.  The feed point is about 28 inches from the base, so the electrical length is closer to 20 feet.

If we go that route, we still need to meet the 2400 / f in kHz field strength rule.

Playing with the spreadsheet from https://sites.google.com/site/lowpowerradio2/antennacalc to see what we can do to load it correctly with the coils and parts that are on hand.

 


 
Posted : 06/09/2018 7:01 pm
 Rich
(@rich)
Posts: 207
Reputable Member Registered
 

Observations:

Operating a 980 kHz unlicensed AM transmit system in the U.S. in compliance with FCC §15.209 would limit its groundwave field intensity at 30 meters from the radiator to about 24.5 µV/m — which is below the ambient r-f noise level at most receive locations.

Below is a calculation for an unlicensed 980 kHz AM system operating in compliance with FCC §15.219a,b&c.  The field it can produce at a distance of 30 meters from the radiator might be about 80X greater than under §15.209.

 


 
Posted : 06/09/2018 11:08 pm
ArtisanRadio
 ArtisanRadio
(@artisan-radio)
Posts: 1869
Member Admin
 

Even if originally unintended by the FCC, using Part 15.219 produces a much greater field strength than Part 15.209.


 
Posted : 07/09/2018 1:09 am
 Carl Blare
(@carl-blare)
Posts: 2621
Famed Member Registered
 

Idea for spareparts

A linear RF amplifier can (theoretically) be used to drive a carrier current system from the C-QUAM transmitter, allowing far better coverage under FCC Part 15.221.

At the moment I do not know a suitable RF amplifier to suggest, but in a moment I'll name someone who possibly can offer a solution.

Also needed would be a CP-15 Tuning Unit to match the RF amp to the power lines.

For further assistance on exploring this idea contact Bill Baker at ISS (Information System Specialists). I do not know his email but one of our other members knows.


 
Posted : 07/09/2018 1:28 am
 AMRadiolegend
(@amradiolegend)
Posts: 335
Reputable Member Registered
 

<div class="css-110">
<div class="contactInfoDetailContent-231">
<div class="contactInfoText-230">
<div class="contentLines-106" title="[email protected]"><span class="contentLine-107">[email protected]</span></div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
 


 
Posted : 07/09/2018 2:28 am
Mark
 Mark
(@mark)
Posts: 2330
Member Moderator
 

Reply to the above post

Huh?


 
Posted : 07/09/2018 7:23 am
 spareparts
(@spareparts)
Posts: 52
Trusted Member Registered
Topic starter
 

Cut & paste that grabbed the HTML:  [email protected]


 
Posted : 07/09/2018 7:36 am
 Rich
(@rich)
Posts: 207
Reputable Member Registered
 

RE:  ... see what we can do to load it correctly ...

Below is a summary with a head start at describing a loading coil for a 3-meter vertical monopole system with its base a few inches above Earth, that might produce the inductive reactance needed to resonate the 980 kHz antenna system defined in my earlier post.  "YMMV."

 


 
Posted : 07/09/2018 8:41 pm
 spareparts
(@spareparts)
Posts: 52
Trusted Member Registered
Topic starter
 

Wll be on site later today to discuss the antenna situation with management. External choices are pretty limited, and the absolute best I can hope for is a mono pole that does not require digging or pouring concrete.

The other option is cloning the Procaster housing and antenna system, and mounting it on the fence.

Question:   What is the Z of the output on the transmitter should I want to build a coaxial or open wire feedline to the actual antenna?


 
Posted : 07/09/2018 10:10 pm
 Rich
(@rich)
Posts: 207
Reputable Member Registered
 

Sometimes simple questions can't (accurately) be answered very simply.

... What is the Z of the output on the transmitter

Most Part 15 AM transmitters are designed to drive a load impedance whose real term might range from maybe 10 Ω to 100 Ω, or so.  Assuming that the transmitter load is resonant at the operating frequency, maximum r-f output power versus the d-c input power to the final amplifier usual peaks somewhere within that range.

The feedpoint impedance of a resonant antenna system for Part 15 AM use typically might be around 50 ±j 0 Ω.   The first term (50 Ω in this case) is the "real" resistance and the only parameter that can dissipate power.  The ±j term is related to the reactance of the load, and is zero ohms at resonance.

The real resistance term of the antenna system at the operating frequency consists of the following ...

  • radiation resistance
  • r-f loss of the radiating conductors (usually negligible)
  • r-f loss of the loading coil, at system resonance
  • r-f loss in the connection to r-f ground (typically, Earth)

Of those elements, only the radiation resistance produces the e-m field useful for "broadcasting."  The others in that list simply produce heat.

... should I want to build a coaxial or open wire feedline to the actual antenna?

Any/all feedline length must be included in the 3-meter maximum length permitted by the FCC under 47 CFR §15.219(b).  This is the reason that many commercially-made transmitters for Part 15 AM connect the transmitter r-f output terminal directly to the base of the ~3-meter monopole, or to the input of a loading coil installed directly at its base.

Sorry that this wasn't stated more succinctly, but I ran out of time 🙂


 
Posted : 07/09/2018 11:10 pm
Forum Jump:
  Previous Topic
Next Topic  
Share:
Forum Information
Recent Posts
Unread Posts
Tags
  • 13 Forums
  • 7,756 Topics
  • 63.6 K Posts
  • 14 Online
  • 2,249 Members
Our newest member: electronic
Latest Post: Part 15 Too Restrictive for Automakers
Forum Icons: Forum contains no unread posts Forum contains unread posts
Topic Icons: Not Replied Replied Active Hot Sticky Unapproved Solved Private Closed

Primary Sidebar

Online Members

 No online members at the moment

Recent Posts

  • RichPowers

    Ultra long range Part 15 broadcasting (to space)

    While car makers appear to be opting for the licenced s...

    By RichPowers , 12 hours ago

  • Mark

    Here's a look at why we do processing and what each function does.

    Shows for FM but applies to AM also.

    By Mark , 4 days ago

  • Mark

    RE: Early 80s Realty Radio' AM transmitters

    I don't think the audio quality would be that good on t...

    By Mark , 2 weeks ago

  • RichPowers

    RE: Early 80s Realty Radio' AM transmitters

    I was very tempted to buy them both, they were dirt che...

    By RichPowers , 2 weeks ago

  • RichPowers

    RE: Part 15 Too Restrictive for Automakers

    @mark I had to pause when you mentioned "15 minute citi...

    By RichPowers , 2 weeks ago

Recent Topics

  • Mark

    Here's a look at why we do processing and what each function does.

    By Mark 4 days ago

  • RichPowers

    Part 15 Too Restrictive for Automakers

    By RichPowers 2 weeks ago

  • RichPowers

    From Virtue to Vice - Music Morality

    By RichPowers 3 weeks ago

  • RichPowers

    affordable DAC Impressive Versatility “audiophile quality” Promising Big performance at small price

    By RichPowers 3 weeks ago

  • RichPowers

    New Canadian Resident?

    By RichPowers 3 weeks ago

Topic Tags

  • Carl Blare3
  • KDX RADIO3
  • WINDOZE3
  • Transmitter2
  • Radio Phvern2
  • station upgrade2
  • archive.org2
  • playlist2
  • Zara Radio2
  • #SW2101
View all tags (75)

Copyright © 2026 · Part15.org · Log in

‹›×

    ‹›×