• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Part15

Part15

License Free, legal, low-power radio broadcasting

  • About Us
  • Forums
  • Resources
  • Members
  • Contact Us
  • Log In

Big Talker Tune Up

November 29, 2011 by Carl Blare

Since the two AM transmitters and antennas just got a very complete tune up, with the new AMT5000 and all, it was time to check out Big Talker, the shortwave transmitter at 13.560mHz. It has been running everyday since being built but I checked it out and re-adjusted the power.

I backed off the modulation a bit, since the audio quality is so crystal clear it sounds like an FM station, and I don’t want those highs to splatter too much.

The power is set at 495mW, which is high, but since the antenna is still indoors I doubt that it matters very much.

Once the antenna is outdoors I’m backing down to PhilB’s recommended 45mW.

Filed Under: Uncategorized

About Carl Blare

Ambassador of Recreational Radio, owner operator of KDX Worldround Radio, webmaster for kdxradio.com, host of The Blare Blog.

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. MICRO1700 says

    November 29, 2011 at 4:08 am

    Hi Carl!
    45 mW seems high to me for an outside
    antenna. Am I wrong, my friend?

    (Well – into a dipole – that’s what I
    was thinking.)

    Best Wishes,
    Bruce, DOGRADIO STUDIO 2

    • Carl Blare says

      November 29, 2011 at 6:16 am

      Could Be
      Hey MICRO Dog!

      Back during the design of Big Talker PhilB ran some simulations and posted a beautiful antenna chart for achieving the FCC allowed power level at 13.560 using 3-different antenna types, including a dipole.

      He said that in each case the average power to the input of the final would be 45 mW, taking into account the various inefficiencies and losses that would be normal.

      The only version of Big Talker that goes down to 45mW is the PhilB version. The Radio8z circuit has a higher power range, for us indoor users and anyone with a poor antenna.

  2. RFB says

    November 29, 2011 at 12:25 pm

    Proper Power
    Guys, there is no way a guesstimate from a software program or just pulled out of a wabbit hat is going to be adequate in assuring that field strength limit is not exceeded.

    Once again….man I need a parrot for this….real world conditions do not occur in virtual computer programs and assumptions based on one location or observation that is applicable to all does not fly either.

    Your going to need to measure that signal off that external antenna as it is in the environment it is built for. Unless Phil lives next door to you, 45 mW may not be enough, or too much simply due to the variances from one location to another.

    Maybe start out at 45mW and call a two way radio place and arrange for one of their techs with those fancy IFR’s to come measure your field strength. (hopefully they have a Motorola instead)

    Added: Does this antenna chart include all the thousands of variables from location to location or just figures picked out of thin air created by a software program? Did the chart account for all the environment variables as well? If it does, that must be one HUGE chart!…is it?

    I think we have had enough of the “out of thin air” via the financial system to be spreading that over into engineering.

    JMO

    RFB

    • MICRO1700 says

      November 29, 2011 at 4:58 pm

      Hi Carl abd RFB!
      Nice to hear from you guys.

      Thanks for the info and I hope all
      is well.

      Bruce, DOGRADIO STUDIO 2

  3. Carl Blare says

    November 29, 2011 at 5:19 pm

    The Antenna Simulation
    Here is PhilB’s antenna simulation for 13.560mHz SW

    http://www.kdxradio.com/am_files/bigtalk_antennas.txt

    This simulation is the only document of attempted compliance available, as without it there’s no available way of verifying compliance, except the very costly step of hiring an engineering professional.

    • RFB says

      November 29, 2011 at 6:35 pm

      Updates
      “This simulation is the only document of attempted compliance available”

      Maybe adding more data with field results to the document would be beneficial. As to the expense of finding an engineer who could perform the measurements on site, that can be overcome by getting to know one and negotiate.

      Bartering is still a viable option.

      RFB

      • rock95seven says

        November 29, 2011 at 8:30 pm

        Hmmm
        Interesting indeed.

      • RichPowers says

        November 30, 2011 at 6:16 am

        As to the expense of finding
        As to the expense of finding an engineer who could perform the measurements on site, that can be overcome by getting to know one and negotiate.
        Bartering is still a viable option.

        Buy him a beer

  4. ABMedia1 says

    November 30, 2011 at 5:20 pm

    Shortwave Question
    how do you set up a shortwave TX and antenna is it like AM or FM, or is it completely different? can anybody explain it to me, because honestly i have no idea?

    thanks

  5. Carl Blare says

    November 30, 2011 at 5:29 pm

    Shortwave Part 15
    Glad you asked that question, ABMedia1

    This would be a good time to clarify the Part 15 rules for shortwave, which are different from either AM_MW or FM. It has been awhile since these details were posted.

    The rule most often discussed pertains to broadcast at 13.560mHz, which allows higher power (as measured in the field at a distance) and any kind of antenna.

    15.225 (a) Operation within the band 13.553 – 13.567 mHz
    (13.560 is in the very center of that band)

    I will let you look it up for yourself.

    There are other rules for other shortwave frequencies which are in the same general section of the rules, but they have very low power levels.

    • MICRO1700 says

      December 1, 2011 at 1:28 am

      You Are The Only One
      Carl, you are the only person in our group that
      is actually transmitting Part 15 AM on 13.560 MHz.

      As far as we know.

      There was that nice guy in Germany (?) that was
      experimenting there. And one member of our
      group had been on there at some point. But we
      don’t know if either of them are still on.

      I wish I could finish my unit. It will happen at some
      point.

      Meanwhile, I wish I lived next door to you, Carl. I would
      park my old Hammarlund (SP?) HQ-140X on 13.560.

      That would be fun!

      Bruce, DOGRADIO STUDIO 2

  6. Carl Blare says

    December 1, 2011 at 2:24 am

    Round Trip Radio
    Bruce MICRO Dog 2, if you lived next door with your Hammerlund (is that right?) you could listen to me and I could listen to you and we could call it Round Trip Radio.

    The guy in Germany is in France, Radio Bon Esprit, and I haven’t heard from Bertrand since he got his 13.870 transmitter on the air.

    The other SW on the site is WILCOM LAB but I don’t know the status of his station.

Primary Sidebar

Online Members

 No online members at the moment

Recent Posts

  • RichPowers

    Ultra long range Part 15 broadcasting (to space)

    While car makers appear to be opting for the licenced s...

    By RichPowers , 2 days ago

  • Mark

    Here's a look at why we do processing and what each function does.

    Shows for FM but applies to AM also.

    By Mark , 6 days ago

  • Mark

    RE: Early 80s Realty Radio' AM transmitters

    I don't think the audio quality would be that good on t...

    By Mark , 2 weeks ago

  • RichPowers

    RE: Early 80s Realty Radio' AM transmitters

    I was very tempted to buy them both, they were dirt che...

    By RichPowers , 2 weeks ago

  • RichPowers

    RE: Part 15 Too Restrictive for Automakers

    @mark I had to pause when you mentioned "15 minute citi...

    By RichPowers , 2 weeks ago

Recent Topics

  • Mark

    Here's a look at why we do processing and what each function does.

    By Mark 6 days ago

  • RichPowers

    Part 15 Too Restrictive for Automakers

    By RichPowers 2 weeks ago

  • RichPowers

    From Virtue to Vice - Music Morality

    By RichPowers 3 weeks ago

  • RichPowers

    affordable DAC Impressive Versatility “audiophile quality” Promising Big performance at small price

    By RichPowers 3 weeks ago

  • RichPowers

    New Canadian Resident?

    By RichPowers 3 weeks ago

Topic Tags

  • Carl Blare3
  • KDX RADIO3
  • WINDOZE3
  • Transmitter2
  • Radio Phvern2
  • station upgrade2
  • archive.org2
  • playlist2
  • Zara Radio2
  • Carrier Current1
View all tags (74)

Copyright © 2026 · Part15.org · Log in