• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Part15

Part15

License Free, legal, low-power radio broadcasting

  • About Us
  • Forums
  • Resources
  • Members
  • Contact Us
  • Log In

SSTRAN: Regarding Heat Tolerance

April 21, 2006 by mlr

I had asked Phil at SSNTRAN about how it should handle heat, since I now live at the focal point of the cosmos’ magnifying glass. (AKA: Tucson)

On 4/18/06, [email protected] wrote:
Rick,

The crystal is rated to be within .002% of frequency over the temp range of -20C to 70C (-4F to 158F). The spec sheet doesn’t say what happens outside this operating range. Storage temperature limits are -40C to 85C (-40F to 185F) which are the absolute safe limits before damage would occur over time.

I had asked Phil at SSNTRAN about how it should handle heat, since I now live at the focal point of the cosmos’ magnifying glass. (AKA: Tucson)

On 4/18/06, [email protected] wrote:
Rick,

The crystal is rated to be within .002% of frequency over the temp range of -20C to 70C (-4F to 158F). The spec sheet doesn’t say what happens outside this operating range. Storage temperature limits are -40C to 85C (-40F to 185F) which are the absolute safe limits before damage would occur over time.

Phil

—–Original Message—–
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Tuesday, April 18, 2006 10:48 AM
To: Rick Collette
Subject: RE: temp tolerance
Hi Rick,

Good question. There really aren’t any components that will be affected by temperature extremes that are likely to be experienced in the US. The only possible concern is the frequency accuracy at very low or very high temps. I will look at the crystal spec tonight and give you an estimate of usable limits.

Phil

Filed Under: Uncategorized

Primary Sidebar

Online Members

 No online members at the moment

Recent Posts

  • RichPowers

    Ultra long range Part 15 broadcasting (to space)

    While car makers appear to be opting for the licenced s...

    By RichPowers , 2 days ago

  • Mark

    Here's a look at why we do processing and what each function does.

    Shows for FM but applies to AM also.

    By Mark , 6 days ago

  • Mark

    RE: Early 80s Realty Radio' AM transmitters

    I don't think the audio quality would be that good on t...

    By Mark , 2 weeks ago

  • RichPowers

    RE: Early 80s Realty Radio' AM transmitters

    I was very tempted to buy them both, they were dirt che...

    By RichPowers , 2 weeks ago

  • RichPowers

    RE: Part 15 Too Restrictive for Automakers

    @mark I had to pause when you mentioned "15 minute citi...

    By RichPowers , 2 weeks ago

Recent Topics

  • Mark

    Here's a look at why we do processing and what each function does.

    By Mark 6 days ago

  • RichPowers

    Part 15 Too Restrictive for Automakers

    By RichPowers 2 weeks ago

  • RichPowers

    From Virtue to Vice - Music Morality

    By RichPowers 3 weeks ago

  • RichPowers

    affordable DAC Impressive Versatility “audiophile quality” Promising Big performance at small price

    By RichPowers 3 weeks ago

  • RichPowers

    New Canadian Resident?

    By RichPowers 3 weeks ago

Topic Tags

  • Carl Blare3
  • KDX RADIO3
  • WINDOZE3
  • Transmitter2
  • Radio Phvern2
  • station upgrade2
  • archive.org2
  • playlist2
  • Zara Radio2
  • #SW2101
View all tags (75)

Copyright © 2026 · Part15.org · Log in